1. An objective and standardized test of foot function: Normative values and validation in patients with reflex sympathetic dystrophy 
Marius A. Kemler, MD, Henrica C.W. De Vet, PhD 
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 
Volume 81, Issue 10, Pages (October 2000)
DOI: /apmr
Copyright © 2000 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

2. Fig. 1 (A) The footboard; (B) the pedal panel; and (C) the foot panel.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /apmr )
Copyright © 2000 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

3. Fig. 2 The footboard subtests: (A) FBS; (B) LS; (C) TB; and (D) DP.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /apmr )
Copyright © 2000 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

4. Fig. 3
Mean results (±SD) of the unaffected and affected feet of 20 patients with RSD compared with sex- and dominance-corrected control values on footboard subtests FBS, LS, TB, and DP. DP results are presented for the age groups of 20 to 40 years (n = 11) and older than 40 years (n = 9). All differences between patients and controls are significant (p <.05).
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /apmr )
Copyright © 2000 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions