1. Measurement of quality of recovery using the QoR-40: a quantitative systematic review 
B.F. Gornall, P.S. Myles, C.L. Smith, J.A. Burke, K Leslie, M.J. Pereira, J.E. Bost, K.B. Kluivers, U.G. Nilsson, Y Tanaka, A Forbes 
British Journal of Anaesthesia 
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013)
DOI: /bja/aet014
Copyright © 2013 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

2. Fig 1
Results of the literature search and study selection for meta-analysis.
British Journal of Anaesthesia  , DOI: ( /bja/aet014)
Copyright © 2013 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

3. Fig 2
Meta-analysis of the difference in QoR-40 scores comparing those free from postoperative complications and those with complications.
British Journal of Anaesthesia  , DOI: ( /bja/aet014)
Copyright © 2013 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

4. Fig 3
Meta-analysis of the correlation between the QoR-40 and a 100 mm quality of recovery visual analogue scale scores.
British Journal of Anaesthesia  , DOI: ( /bja/aet014)
Copyright © 2013 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

5. Fig 4
Meta-analysis of the (a) internal reliability, as measured by Cronbach's α; (b) split-half reliability; and (c) test–retest reliability of the QoR-40.
British Journal of Anaesthesia  , DOI: ( /bja/aet014)
Copyright © 2013 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

6. Fig 5
Meta-analysis of the SRM, a measure of responsiveness of the QoR-40.
British Journal of Anaesthesia  , DOI: ( /bja/aet014)
Copyright © 2013 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions