1. Antisense Targeting of cFLIP Sensitizes Activated T Cells to Undergo Apoptosis and Desensitizes Responses to Contact Dermatitis 
Dan V. Mourich, Jessica L. Jendrzejewski, Nikki B. Marshall, David J. Hinrichs, Patrick L. Iversen, Rhonda M. Brand 
Journal of Investigative Dermatology 
Volume 129, Issue 8, Pages (August 2009)
DOI: /jid
Copyright © 2009 The Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc Terms and Conditions

2. Figure 1
Inhibition of cFLIP protein expression shown in T cells after treatment with PPMO targeting AUG start site. Purified BALB/c splenic T cells were cultured 24hours with plate-bound anti-CD3 (5μgml−1) and treated with or without PPMO (5μM) targeting the AUG start site of murine cFLIP or scrambled control sequence. Western blot analysis was performed to determine protein expression levels and equivalent sample loading by prior examination of GAPDH and actin levels.
Journal of Investigative Dermatology  , DOI: ( /jid )
Copyright © 2009 The Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc Terms and Conditions

3. Figure 2
Dose-dependent effect of cFLIP PPMO treatment on antigen-specific activation-induced cell death (AICD). The extent of apoptosis was examined by flow cytometry gating on lymphocytes (R1) that were CD8+, 7-AAD-negative (R2), and staining Annexin-V-positive (R3). Histogram traces: cFLIP PPMO of 12, 6, and 3 and 1μM are indicated as thick black, thin black, and dotted and dashed lines, respectively. Control PPMO (12μM) is indicated as thick gray line. Splenocytes treated with 12μM cFLIP PPMO and stimulated with DCs pulsed with irrelevant peptide are indicated as thin gray line. Inset graph shows a log dose-dependent effect of the number of cells undergoing apoptosis increases with the concentration of cFLIP PPMO. Dose is represented on the abscissa as a log micromolar (μM) concentration and the number of apoptotic cells observed is represented on the ordinate. The goodness of fit is measured as R2= and EC50. These data are representative of two separate experiments.
Journal of Investigative Dermatology  , DOI: ( /jid )
Copyright © 2009 The Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc Terms and Conditions

4. Figure 3
Treatment of transplant recipients with cFLIP PPMO promotes the survival of transplanted male cells that retain functional activity. Female BALB/c mice (N=4) were treated with cFLIP PPMO, scramble PPMO, or left untreated 3 days before and 7 days after transplantation of male DO.11 splenocytes. Animals were killed 14 days post transplantation and their spleens examined for the presence of KJ26+ cells by FACS analysis. (a) The average total number of surviving KJ26+ cells for each treatment group was calculated by flow cytometry analysis and cell counts for individual animals. (b) Functional activity of KJ26+ cells in cFLIP PPMO-treated mice was examined by intracellular cytokine staining after culturing the recipient splenocytes with OVA. An example of one mouse from the cFLIP PPMO treatment group responding to OVA by production of IL-4 and IFN-γ is shown. Cytokine production in cultures not pulsed with OVA produced was <0.01 % of the KJ26+ cells. These data are representative of two separate experiments.
Journal of Investigative Dermatology  , DOI: ( /jid )
Copyright © 2009 The Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc Terms and Conditions

5. Figure 4
Contact allergy response in BALB/c mice determined by measuring difference in ear thickness between treated and untreated ear. (a) Comparison of cFLIP PPMO and vehicle (95% PG/5% LA) or water to reduce increased ear thickness induced by FITC. (b) Dose response for cFLIP PPMO after sensitization with FITC. Control PPMO is a scrambled sequence. (c) Changes in ear thickness after sensitization with oxazolone and treatment with cFLIP or scrambled PPMO. Note differences in scales between graphs. *P<0.05, ##P<0.001 vs sensitizing agent alone (number of animals per group N=6–9).
Journal of Investigative Dermatology  , DOI: ( /jid )
Copyright © 2009 The Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc Terms and Conditions

6. Figure 5
Histological analysis. (a) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained ear sections after contact allergy treatment showing differences in leukocyte infiltration after FITC induction and treatment with cFLIP PPMO (Bar=20μm). (b) Number of leukocytes in 100μm2 area of ear averaged over 10 different sections/sample. (c) Localization of cFLIP in paraffin-embedded ear sections (Bars for panels 1, 3 and 2, 4=40 and 20μm, respectively) (N=6–9). *P<0.05. #P<0.001.
Journal of Investigative Dermatology  , DOI: ( /jid )
Copyright © 2009 The Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc Terms and Conditions

7. Figure 6
Memory response after a second antigen challenge (day 21 elicitation, day 26 measurement) without additional PPMO application. (a) Function of dose and PPMO sequence after FITC challenge. (b) Comparison between changes in ear thickness after initial FITC challenge and memory response as a function of dose. (c) After oxazolone sensitization as a function of sequence. *P<0.05, ##P<0.001 vs sensitizing agent alone (N=6–9).
Journal of Investigative Dermatology  , DOI: ( /jid )
Copyright © 2009 The Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc Terms and Conditions