Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEllen Kirkegaard Modified over 5 years ago
1
Strong School Library Media Programs Make a Difference in Academic Achievement
2
Gaver Study, 1963: Academic achievement is higher when:
There is a centralized library in the school. The library collection is large and easily accessible.
3
Lance Study Finding, 1993: Academic Achievement was higher in Colorado schools when: There was a professional library media specialist The library media specialist collaborated with teachers to build exciting units of instruction The library collection was very large
4
Four Major Studies: 933 Schools, published 2000
Alaska schools, grades 4, 8, 11 Pennsylvania schools, grades 5, 8, 11 Colorado schools, grades 4, 7 Massachusetts schools, grades 4,8,10
5
Two Major Studies in 2001 Oregon 513 schools, grades 5,8, 10
Texas schools, grades 4, 8, 10
6
Two Major Studies, 2002 Iowa 506 schools, grades 4, 8, 11
New Mexico 380 schools, grades 4, 8, 10
7
The 21st Century Library Media Center
Consists of a quality information-rich environment: Books Multimedia resources Databases Electronic periodical collections Quality Internet sites
8
The New Library Media Center:
Is available not only in the LMC, but In the classroom, and On beyond into the Home. And, is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
9
Library Media Center Programs:
Build capable and avid readers Teach every learner to become effective users of ideas and information Partner with teachers to create exciting learning experiences Prepare learners to compete in the information age
10
First, Invest in People Strong Library Media Programs have:
A competent library media professional The human interface Paraprofessional staff Organization/service functions Technical staff Technology support for the school
11
Strong Library Media Specialists:
Collaborate with teachers to build quality learning experiences Teach information literacy (finding, using, and communicating information effectively) Promote reading
12
Findings from 5 States Colorado (2000) 200 schools
Oregon (2001) 513 schools Texas (2001) 600 schools Iowa (2002) 506 schools New Mexico (2002) 380 schools
13
Comparison of Top & Lowest 25 Scoring Schools in 5 States
Library media specialist hours per week per 100 students Elementary: vs % difference Middle: vs % difference High: vs % difference
14
Conclusion The level of professional library media specialist staffing is a key difference between strong and weak library media programs … and between higher and lower scoring students on achievement tests.
15
Comparison of 25 Highest & Lowest Scoring PA Schools
Professional staff hours/week 5th grade vs % difference 8th grade vs % difference 11th grade vs % difference Support staff hours/week 5th grade vs % difference 8th grade vs % difference 11th grade vs % difference
16
Conclusion for Pennsylvania
Support staff was the key difference between strong and weak library media programs in PA. That is, professionals alone cannot make a major difference because of the load of clerical and technical work.
17
Conclusion: The total LMC staff size contributes to academic achievement.
18
Second, Invest in Materials and Technology
Create a quality information-rich and technology-rich environment easily accessible by students and teachers.
19
Large School Library Collections Supply:
Large rotating classroom collections Large bedside collections for teachers and students
20
Research Findings: Rich curriculum-centered collections boost learning. Information technology delivering information to the desktop of the learner enhances learning.
21
Today’s LMC Collections are accessible through a library web page including:
Quality Internet sites Electronic periodicals Databases Attractive information books Multimedia collections Materials meeting special needs Materials of high quality
22
Conclusion: Quality collections are expensive, but they earn their way by boosting achievement.
23
Results of the total investment:
Scores can be expected to be 10-20% higher than in schools without this emphasis.
24
Results are not explained by:
Teacher/pupil ratio Teacher characteristics (education, experience, salaries) Student characteristics (poverty, race/ethnicity) Community demographics (educational attainment, poverty, ethnicity)
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.