Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Don Wright Director of Standards Lexmark International

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Don Wright Director of Standards Lexmark International"— Presentation transcript:

1 Don Wright Director of Standards Lexmark International don@lexmark.com
P2600 Hardcopy Device and System Security May 2008 Working Group Meeting Don Wright Director of Standards Lexmark International 4/15/2019

2 How To Access Xerox Guest Wireless Network
To use the Xerox Guest Wireless network from a location supporting the "Xerox Corporate Enterprise Wireless LAN (XCEWLAN)": Connect to the guest wireless network identified by "XCEWLAN Guest" Acknowledge any insecure network warning messages (this network is not encrypted) Launch a web browser Enter your Guest ID and Password in the login screen and click "Accept“. If you forgot either see Al Sukert. You are now connected to the Internet utilizing the Xerox Guest Network After login with a web browser other client applications may be utilized such as VPN or clients. 4/15/2019

3 Opening Agenda Items Self Introductions Approval of the Agenda
4/15/2019

4 Agenda Items Wednesday/Thursday, May 21-22 Welcome & Introductions
Update and Approve Agenda Review and approve April Minutes IEEE Patent Policy Review New Slides 2008 Meeting Schedule Update on TCG (Volkoff) Update on INCITS CS1 Working Group (Thrasher) Update of CC Vendor's Forum (Sukert) Review of Action Items from April Meeting Ad Hoc Reports PP Evaluation Decision ad hoc status (Nevo) Guide to P2600 PPs ad hoc status (Sukert) 4/15/2019

5 Agenda Items Wednesday/Thursday, May 21-22 Issues raised on e-mail
None Protection Profiles Review and Comments Comments New Approach PPs (Smithson) Overview PP-A Prototype Production Printing Profile (Sukert) Draft Schedule Checkpoint Review Other items Posting and Comment deadlines for June Meeting Next meeting details 4/15/2019

6 Minutes from April Meeting
Minutes were published shortly after the meeting. They are available at: Any additions, deletions or corrections to the April minutes? 4/15/2019

7 Instructions for the WG Chair
The IEEE-SA strongly recommends that at each WG meeting the chair or a designee: Show slides #1 through #4 of this presentation Advise the WG attendees that: The IEEE’s patent policy is consistent with the ANSI patent policy and is described in Clause 6 of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws; Early identification of patent claims which may be essential for the use of standards under development is strongly encouraged; There may be Essential Patent Claims of which the IEEE is not aware. Additionally, neither the IEEE, the WG, nor the WG chair can ensure the accuracy or completeness of any assurance or whether any such assurance is, in fact, of a Patent Claim that is essential for the use of the standard under development. Instruct the WG Secretary to record in the minutes of the relevant WG meeting: That the foregoing information was provided and that slides 1 through 4 (and this slide 0, if applicable) were shown; That the chair or designee provided an opportunity for participants to identify patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) of which the participant is personally aware and that may be essential for the use of that standard Any responses that were given, specifically the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) that were identified (if any) and by whom. The WG Chair shall ensure that a request is made to any identified holders of potential essential patent claim(s) to complete and submit a Letter of Assurance. It is recommended that the WG chair review the guidance in IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual and in FAQs 12 and 12a on inclusion of potential Essential Patent Claims by incorporation or by reference. Note: WG includes Working Groups, Task Groups, and other standards-developing committees with a PAR approved by the IEEE-SA Standards Board. 4/15/2019 (Optional to be shown)

8 Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform
All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy. Participants: “Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents “Personal awareness” means that the participant “is personally aware that the holder may have a potential Essential Patent Claim,” even if the participant is not personally aware of the specific patents or patent claims “Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of such potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents) The above does not apply if the patent claim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group (Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws subclause 6.2) Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged No duty to perform a patent search 4/15/2019 Slide #1

9 Patent Related Links All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development. Patent Policy is stated in these sources: IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual Material about the patent policy is available at If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at or visit This slide set is available at 4/15/2019 Slide #2

10 Call for Potentially Essential Patents
If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance: Either speak up now or Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or Cause an LOA to be submitted 4/15/2019 Slide #3

11 Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings
All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings. Technical considerations remain primary focus Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets. Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object. See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details. 4/15/2019 Slide #4

12 2008 Meeting Schedule June 23-24: Denver/Boulder (PWG Also)
August 11 (& 12?): Portland Sharp (PWG Also)? Week of September 8th at Sharp in Arlington VA October 24th: Lexington? 4/15/2019

13 Trusted Computing Group
Update 4/15/2019

14 INCITS CS1 : Cyber-Security
Update Thrasher 4/15/2019

15 CC Vendors Forum Update Sukert/Thrasher 4/15/2019

16 Action Items from Previous Meetings
Review entries in P2600-action-items excel spreadsheet Pre-meeting Spreadsheet P2600-action-items xls 4/15/2019

17 Old Business PP Evaluation Decision ad hoc (Nevo)
Status Contract completed to atsec Press releases after approval by some “SCHEME” Budget management? Rechartered – anyone want to join or leave? Consider using another scheme for PP-B, C, D if NIAP won’t accept them. Guide to PPs ad hoc (Sukert) Rechartered? 4/15/2019

18 PP Guide Ad Hoc Team Held meetings on May 6th and May 19th:
Have enough information to start Chapters 1-3 of the PP Guide now; assignments made (see below) Can’t complete PP Guide until P2600 has completed PP restructuring and any other changes to address NIAP and Atsec PP feedback. Still want to run the PP Guide outline by Atsec to get its feedback as to whether anything else could or should be added. Current Plan is that initial text of the PP Guide will be available for the August 08 meeting due to the uncertainty surrounding PP content Will likely contain partially completed sections Checkpoint to see if we are on “right track” Team Member Assignments PP Guide Section Alan & Peter Chapters 1-3 Brian w/ lots of help Chapter 4 Alan w/ help Incorporate NIAP Comments Lee / Carmen / Nancy / Sameer Chapter 5 Usage Guidelines Ron w/ Atsec Chapter 6 FAQs 4/15/2019

19 Issues raised on e-mail
None 4/15/2019

20 Protection Profiles Review
PP-A (version 35a) PP-B (version 35a) PP-C (version 35a) PP-D (version 35a) Comments Submitted 4/15/2019

21 “New Approach” Protection Profile
Overview PP-A Prototype 4/15/2019

22 PP Path Forward Decision –
Get atsec to write up why the “packages” approach is consistent with CC Evangelize the “packages” approach to other schemes and get their public endorsement Evangelize the “packages” approach to the key technologist at IPA (Haruki Tabuchi). Get the “packages” approach on the CCDB agenda Get a better draft of “A” Take the recommendation to go to “package” to the whole WG. 4/15/2019

23 Production Printing Protection Profile
Production Printing Profile Status (Sukert) Draft: Issues/Comments/Ideas? 4/15/2019

24 Project Schedule All Documents May Meeting (May 21-22)
Feedback from atsec Recommendation on “family” versus “packages” June Meeting (June 23-24) WG Comments on “packages” draft Feedback from IPA from JBMIA meeting Update on Production Printing Profile Make a decision on getting a PAR for Production Printing Profile Make a decision on the SCHEME(s) to be used Create new sponsor ballot bodies (After June 28) August Meeting (Aug 11 & Sharp PDX Revisit NIAP CIM comments Deal with SCHEME comments Deal with WG comments Draft of Guide Start Evaluation of PPs (post meeting) Start .1, .2, .3, & .4 Sponsor Ballot (post meeting) September Meeting (Sept 9 & 10 at Sharp DCA) Deal with any comments received from SCHEME/atsec Work on Guide October Meeting (Oct 24 at Lexmark LEX) Process sponsor ballot comments on .1, .2, .3, .4 Discuss if PP’s still match Std 2600 – if not, process amendment PAR December (11-12 in FL or week of 15th anywhere) Meeting Process Sponsor Ballot *recirculation” Comments Finish Guide 4/15/2019

25 Other Items Do we need to add any more meetings?
Do we need to meeting in August / September / October? Yes and probably a December meeting as well 4/15/2019

26 June Meeting Deadlines
All PPs are under change control All comments must be in the tool The editor may not make changes EXCEPT based on submitted and accepted comments. Posting of Documents: June 9,2008 Posting of Comments: June 16, 2008 4/15/2019

27 Next Meeting Details June 23-24, 2008
Radisson Hotel & Conference Center Longmont-Boulder 1900 Ken Pratt Boulevard Longmont, CO Ph No hotel block Meeting Fee: $65 per day Registration through the PWG 4/15/2019

28 Next Meeting Location Map
Longmont Boulder 4/15/2019

29 Thanks! See you in Boulder/Longmont!! 4/15/2019

30 Back-up Charts BACK-UP CHARTS 4/15/2019

31 Mailing List and Web Site
Listserv run by the IEEE An archive is available on the web site Subscribe via a note to: containing the line: subscribe stds-2600 Only subscribers may send to the mailing list. No Change 4/15/2019


Download ppt "Don Wright Director of Standards Lexmark International"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google