1. The stable boundary layer parametrization problem
Here is a nice picture of a stable bl in California.
Dr Bob Beare
© Crown copyright 2004

2. What is the stable boundary layer (SBL)?
Overview
What is the stable boundary layer (SBL)?
Why is it important to the Met Office?
SBL modelling in the UM and other GCMs.
The GABLS stable boundary layer initiative.
Comparison with Cardington observations.
Fir
© Crown copyright 2004

3. What is the stable boundary layer (SBL)
Boundary layer is lowest 200m-2km of atmosphere, mainly turbulent. Over land is convective (driven by surface heating) by day and stable (driven by vertical wind shear) by night.
Stable boundary layer also occurs when warmer air is advected over cold ocean surfaces (e.g. warm sector of Extra-tropical cyclone, some off-shore winds) and over the polar ice sheets.
© Crown copyright 2004

4. Stable boundary layers in Global Model
Land masses
Red=stable
Warm
Sector
© Crown copyright 2004

5. Why is simulating stable boundary layer (SBL) important?
Basic understanding
Surface temperature forecasting at night
Drag on extra-tropical cyclones
Fog forecasting
Polar climate
especially Antarctic winter, King et al. (2001) QJRMS
Dispersion studies
Wind power (low level jets)
As motivation...
boundary layer scheme and surface exchange scheme; important problem
for variety of customers
Fog (radiation) forms in stable conditions, small differences in T structure could be difference of saturation or not
Areas like Antarctic in winter persitistent SBLs, King changing SBL and
surface exchange dramatic effect of surface T.. Katabatic drainage flows.
Dispersion: deviations of plume at night: variance parametrizations
© Crown copyright 2004

6. Gradient Richardson number
Stratification
Shear
Compactly represents the energetics: shear generation vs buoyancy consumption.
Ri < 0.25 turbulence ‘turns on’.
Represents local nature of stable turbulence.
Fluxes of wind and heat as a diffusion model.
Explain symbols
K = boundary layer param. all about this
mixing length deformation and a function of Richardson no.
Ri no. is a measure of stability of turbulent flow stratification/shear^(2)
It is local constistent with local scaling (c.gf convect bl)
high shear and low stratification low stability
low shear and high stratification high stability
fundamental turb
© Crown copyright 2004

7. NWP stability functions
First order SBL scheme in Met Office NWP model:
Long tails; Also sharp tails
used in research
As mentioned earlier, one of the motivations for GABLS is improving parametrizations,
1st order commonly used in operational NWP models and climate models.
Cast the LES data in form for comparison.
Simple but not simplistic: non-linear, local scaling.
Numerical stability.
© Crown copyright 2004

8. The enhanced mixing issue
Stability dependence of operational schemes do not match theory and micrometeorological obs., with extended tails at high Richardson number. Possible reasons:
Limiting runaway cooling when coupled to surface exchange scheme (Derbyshire 1999, BLM, Viterbo et al 1999 QJRMS).
Representing intermittency at high Richardson number (van de Wiel et al 2002, JAS).
Subgrid heterogeneties (Delage 1997, BLM).
Compensating for biases elsewhere in the NWP system (King et al 2001, QJRMS). Convective boundary layer, resolution.
On compensating errors: HADGEM= SHARP, GM = LONG, MES= LOUIS/SHARP.
Resolution 3 or 4 points for mod stability (h=300m), 1 or 2 points for very high stability (h=50m)….. Woefully inadequate!!!
© Crown copyright 2004

9. Sensitivity to SHARP tails (reduced mixing)
Cooling over NH land with respect to analysis (DJF)
This is the average of 5 NH winter forecasts (Paul Earnshaw’s suite)
Similar negative bias over antartic in JJA
© Crown copyright 2004

10. Vertical resolution issues
Look how poor things are over land!!
Land SBLs
Sea SBLS
© Crown copyright 2004

11. New formulations of SBL scheme
New formulation of SBL scheme by Williams (2002), option in umui, so called ‘Equilibrium scheme’. However shares essential physics of old scheme: local stability dependence, first order closure, but within more complicated framework.
Formulation involving SBL depth coupled to surface scheme being pursued (Anne McCabe).
© Crown copyright 2004

12. Different SBL formulations
Anne McCabe
50 equations
5 eqns
Different
constants
Here is a comparison of different compliexity of the SBL formulation but that still share
Same physics (local scaling)
© Crown copyright 2004

13. 12 hour fog forecast, 7 Z 18 Nov 2002 mesoscale model, Fog fraction
12 hour forecast using MES, overnight last Nov (current weather)
High to w, Low to SE, light wind, surface cooling, stable conditions over land over night, radiation fog
Fog fraction: fraction of grid box with. vis <1km
Enhanced fog over Holland.. Consistent with observations from that time
(see web site)
Current scheme
Scheme with less mixing
© Crown copyright 2004

14. GEWEX atmospheric boundary layer study (GABLS)
International collaboration to inform improvements of stable boundary layer parametrization with single column and Large-eddy models. Chaired by Prof. Bert Holtslag, Wagenigen Uni., Holland.
Initial intercomparison for a simple case: prescribed geostrophic winds, surface cooling, akin to Arctic ocean case. Large-eddy study led by Met Office (Beare, McCabe, MacVean).
Special issue to appear in Boundary Layer Met
Similar status to GCSS but newer
© Crown copyright 2004

15. GABLS Single column model intercomparison
Met Office Single column model
© Crown copyright 2004

16. Large-eddy simulation (LES) of SBL
LES of stable boundary layer is hard! : eddies of order 25m.
Smagorinsky diffusion (blue) ; Stochastic backscatter (red)
Brown et al. (1994) : Closer to surface layer similarity and
stimulates stable turbulence
Prescribed surface flux and surface cooling rate
Domain 400m x 400m x 400m; grid lengths 10m to 1m
LES equations: momentum, heat ,continuity
dry, advection, coriolis, p-grad, buoyancy,
SUB-GRID model…
SBL LES hard resolution…. Intermitternt flows event more of a challenge
Smagorinsky diffusion.. Not too different from param used in UM
and then stoch backscatter, regions marginally resolved
backscatter as well as dissipation of energy.
Set ups of cooling:flux and dT.dt
domain : note small grid-lengths and domains.
© Crown copyright 2004

17. Mean potential temperature
See:
Successful: generates resolved turbulence, spread not huge
See web-site for more
Spread but within bounds
Positive curvature in PT, differences at BL top (partly BCs)
GEWEX atmospheric boundary layer study (GABLS) on stable boundary
layers.
© Crown copyright 2004

18. Momentum stability functions
And we find at coarse and fine resolution , that stability functions implied by LES are a lot sharper than the traditionally used LONG tails.
What are the reasons?
Physical: Sub-grid heterogenity – Mahrt and Delage… but the LES does provide an ensemble mean and thus accounts
For variability, all be it for flat terrain.
Pragmatic: compensating errors elsewhere in the climate/ NWP model It would be really good to understand this more in
The future.
© Crown copyright 2004

19. Comparison with Cardington observations
Aim: To use Cardington balloon observations to provide a fair test of LES models and
UM SBL scheme (collaboration with John Edwards).
Simulation of SBL from 2030Z on 23 Sept 2003 till 0230Z 24 Sept Clear sky, Geostrophic wind 7m/s.
Initialisation with observed wind and pot. Temp profiles, forced with observed 1.2m temp., geostrophic wind.
© Crown copyright 2004

20. Balloon observations provided by Alan Lapworth, OBR
Comparison of LES and tethered balloon observations for Cardington, Bedford
Balloon observations provided by Alan Lapworth, OBR
© Crown copyright 2004

21. Sensitivity to initial wind profile
© Crown copyright 2004

22. Cardington case: sensitivity to stability function
© Crown copyright 2004

23. Vertical velocity cross-section and spectra
Distinct peak
Red positive, blue down
© Crown copyright 2004

24. Summary
Stable boundary layer parametrizations in NWP/climate models tend to have more mixing than in Large-eddy simulations and observations.
For a moderately stable case, LESs from different models compare well, providing useful guidance for NWP.
Promising recent comparison with observations, highlighting importance of initial profile in simulating nocturnal boundary layer.
© Crown copyright 2004

25. Future work Reassess the impact of SBL parametrization on
synoptic flow in UM: cyclone evolution
GABLS 2 intercomparison (Anne Mccabe)
Reformulation of SBL scheme.. Mixing length, and boundary layer depth (Anne McCabe and John Edwards)
Tackling the very stable limit with LES: decoupling, intermittence, heterogeneities.
Beare and MacVean (2004), ‘Resolution sensitivity and scaling of large-eddy simulations of the stable boundary layer’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 112,
Beare et al (2005),’ An intercomparison of large-eddy simulations of the stable boundary layer’, to appear in Boundary-Layer Meteorol. (see
© Crown copyright 2004