Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Left Ventricular Assist Device Destination Therapy Versus Extended Criteria Cardiac Transplant  Mani A. Daneshmand, MD, Keshava Rajagopal, MD, PhD, Brian.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Left Ventricular Assist Device Destination Therapy Versus Extended Criteria Cardiac Transplant  Mani A. Daneshmand, MD, Keshava Rajagopal, MD, PhD, Brian."— Presentation transcript:

1 Left Ventricular Assist Device Destination Therapy Versus Extended Criteria Cardiac Transplant 
Mani A. Daneshmand, MD, Keshava Rajagopal, MD, PhD, Brian Lima, MD, Nikta Khorram, BS, Laura J. Blue, NP, Andrew J. Lodge, MD, Adrian F. Hernandez, MD, Joseph G. Rogers, MD, Carmelo A. Milano, MD  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  Volume 89, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010) DOI: /j.athoracsur Copyright © 2010 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

2 Fig 1 Reasons for transplant ineligibility in each group. While advanced age was the most common reason for transplant ineligibility for both extended criteria–alternate list cardiac transplantation (EC-AL) and destination therapy with left ventricular assist device (DT-LVAD) groups, the DT-LVAD patients were more commonly ineligible due to obesity and pulmonary hypertension (*p < 0.05). (CRI = chronic renal insufficiency; DM = diabetes mellitus; EOD = end-organ dysfunction; HTN = hypertension.) The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur ) Copyright © 2010 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

3 Fig 2 (A) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis comparing extended criteria–alternate list cardiac transplantation (EC-AL) patients (solid line) to destination therapy with left ventricular assist device (DT-LVAD) patients (dotted line) and REMATCH cohort (dashed line). Inclusion of EC-AL patients is conditional on survival to transplantation. The DT-LVAD patients significantly outperform the REMATCH cohort both in short-term (30-day and 1-year) and midterm (3-year) survival. The EC-AL patient survival is superior to that of DT-LVAD patients at 3 years. (B) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis comparing EC-AL (solid line) to DT-LVAD (dotted line) wherein EC-AL patients are accounted for at time of listing for transplantation. Survival of EC-AL and DT-LVAD patients is similar at all time points. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur ) Copyright © 2010 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

4 Fig 3 Reasons for transplant ineligibility in each propensity-matched group: extended criteria–alternate list cardiac transplantation (EC-AL) patients (black bars) and destination therapy with left ventricular assist device (DT-LVAD) patients (gray bars). Advanced age and obesity remain the most common reasons for transplant ineligibility. (CRI = chronic renal insufficiency; DM = diabetes mellitus; EOD = end-organ dysfunction; HTN = hypertension.) The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur ) Copyright © 2010 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

5 Fig 4 Kaplan-Meier survival estimates comparing matched groups of destination therapy with left ventricular assist device (DT-LVAD) patients (dotted line) and extended criteria–alternate list cardiac transplantation (EC-AL) patients (solid line). The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur ) Copyright © 2010 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

6 Fig 5 Kaplan-Meier survival estimates comparing matched groups of destination therapy with left ventricular assist device (DT-LVAD) patients (dotted line) and extended criteria–alternate list cardiac transplantation (EC-AL) patients (solid line) after removing the HeartMate XVE patients from the DT-LVAD group. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.athoracsur ) Copyright © 2010 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions


Download ppt "Left Ventricular Assist Device Destination Therapy Versus Extended Criteria Cardiac Transplant  Mani A. Daneshmand, MD, Keshava Rajagopal, MD, PhD, Brian."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google