Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

WWiSE IEEE n Proposal August 13, 2004

Published byPetra Gulyás Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "WWiSE IEEE n Proposal August 13, 2004"— Presentation transcript:

1 WWiSE IEEE 802.11n Proposal August 13, 2004
Airgo Networks, Bermai, Broadcom, Conexant, STMicroelectronics, Texas Instruments WWiSE group

2 Contributors and contact information Airgo Networks: VK Jones, Bermai: Neil Hamady, Broadcom: Jason Trachewsky, Conexant: Michael Seals, STMicroelectronics: George Vlantis, Texas Instruments: Sean Coffey, WWiSE group

3 Contents WWiSE approach Overview of key features Proposal description
Physical layer design MAC features Discussion Summary WWiSE group

4 The WWiSE approach WWiSE = World Wide Spectrum Efficiency
The partnership was formed to develop a specification for next generation WLAN technology suitable for worldwide deployment Mandatory modes of the WWiSE proposal comply with current requirements in all major regulatory domains: Europe, Asia, Americas Proposal design emphasizes compatibility with existing installed base, building on experience with interoperability in g and previous amendments All modes are compatible with QoS and e Maximal spectral efficiency translates to highest performance and throughput in all modes WWiSE group

5 Overview of key mandatory features
The WWiSE proposal’s mandatory modes are: 2 transmit antennas 20 MHz operation 135 Mbps maximum PHY rate 2x1 transmit diversity modes Mixed mode preambles enabling on-the-air legacy compatibility Efficient greenfield preambles – no increase in length over legacy Enhanced efficiency MAC mechanisms All components based on enhancement of existing COFDM PHY 2x2 MIMO operation in a 20 MHz channel: Goal is a robust, efficient, small-form-factor, universally compliant 100 Mbps mode that fits naturally with the existing installed base WWiSE group

6 Overview of key optional features
The WWiSE proposal’s optional modes are: 3 and 4 transmit antennas 40 MHz operation Up to 540 Mbps PHY rate 3x2, 4x2, 4x3 transmit diversity modes Advanced coding: Rate-compatible LDPC code All modes are open-loop WWiSE group

7 Physical layer design Data modes Preambles Transmitter structure
PHY rates MIMO interleaving Preambles Short sequences Long sequences SIGNAL fields WWiSE group

8 Transmitter block diagram
FEC encoder, puncturer MIMO interleaver Symbol mapper D/A Interpol., filtering, limiter Upconverter, amplifier IFFT Add cyclic extension (guard) Add pilots Insert training WWiSE group

9 Mandatory data modes 2 transmitter space-division multiplexing, 20 MHz
2 transmitter space-time transmit diversity, 20 MHz 802.11a/g (OFDM) modes 64-state BCC WWiSE group

10 2 transmitter SDM, 20 MHz (mandatory)
PHY rate Data carriers Pilots Code rate Cyclic prefix, ns Code Constellation 54 Mbps 54 2 1/2 800 BCC 16-QAM 81 Mbps 3/4 108 Mbps 2/3 64-QAM 121.5 Mbps 135 Mbps 5/6 WWiSE group

11 2x1 modes, 20 MHz (mandatory)
PHY rate Data carriers Pilots Code rate Cyclic prefix, ns Code Constellation 6.75 Mbps 54 2 1/2 800 BCC BPSK Mbps 3/4 13.5 Mbps QPSK 20.25 Mbps 27 Mbps 16-QAM 40.5 Mbps 54 Mbps 2/3 64-QAM 60.75 Mbps WWiSE group

12 Optional data modes 20 MHz: 40 MHz: (all 40 MHz modes optional)
3 Tx space-division multiplexing 4 Tx space division multiplexing 3x2, 4x2, 4x3 space-time transmit diversity 40 MHz: (all 40 MHz modes optional) 1 Tx antenna 2 Tx space division multiplexing 3 Tx space division multiplexing 2x1, 3x2, 4x2, 4x3 space-time transmit diversity LDPC code option An option in all proposed MIMO configurations and channel bandwidths WWiSE group

13 Optional modes, common format
Code rate Cyclic prefix, ns Code Constellation 1/2 800 BCC, LDPC 16-QAM 3/4 2/3 64-QAM 5/6 All combinations of 2, 3, 4 transmit antennas and 20/40 MHz offer exactly these 5 modes All 20 MHz modes have 54 data subcarriers, 2 pilots. All 40 MHz modes have 108 data subcarriers, 4 pilots WWiSE group

14 Optional mode data rates
20 MHz: Configuration Rate ½, 16-QAM Rate ¾, 16-QAM Rate 2/3, 64-QAM Rate ¾, 64-QAM Rate 5/6, 64-QAM 3 Tx, 20 MHz 81 121.5 162 182.25 202.5 4 Tx, 20 MHz 108 216 243 270 40 MHz: Configuration Rate ½, 16-QAM Rate ¾, 16-QAM Rate 2/3, 64-QAM Rate ¾, 64-QAM Rate 5/6, 64-QAM 1 Tx, 40 MHz 54 81 108 121.5 135 2 Tx, 40 MHz 162 216 243 270 3 Tx, 40 MHz 324 364.5 405 4 Tx, 40 MHz 364 432 486 540 WWiSE group

15 Interpol., filtering, limiter MIMO interleaver Symbol mapper
Add pilots Insert training FEC encoder, puncturer Interpol., filtering, limiter MIMO interleaver Symbol mapper Upconverter, amplifier IFFT D/A Add cyclic extension (guard) WWiSE group

16 Preambles Mixed-mode preambles: Green-field preambles:
Capable of operation in presence of legacy 11a/g devices Ensure correct deferral behavior by devices compliant to legacy spec Green-field preambles: Operate in environment or time interval with only 11n devices on the air Applicable in combination with protection mechanisms, as in 11g, or in 11n-only BSSs Greater efficiency than mixed-mode preambles Both preamble types are derived from a common basic structure, providing reuse in algorithms WWiSE group

17 Short training sequence
2 Transmitters 3 Transmitters 4 Transmitters STRN 400 ns cs 200 ns cs STRN 400 ns cs 200 ns cs 600 ns cs 20 MHz: STRN = ag short training sequence 40 MHz mixed mode: STRN = Pair of ag short sequences separated in frequency by 20 MHz 40 MHz green field: STRN = Newly defined sequence cs = Cyclic shift WWiSE group

18 Long training sequence and SIGNAL-N, green-field, 2 transmitters
GI21 STRN 400 ns cs LTRN 1600 ns cs GI2 SIGNAL-N 20 MHz: LTRN = ag long training sequence with four extra tones, 6.4 usec 40 MHz: LTRN = Newly defined sequence, 6.4 usec GI21 = GI2 for LTRN with 1600 ns cyclic shift SIGNAL-N = 54 bits, 4 usec WWiSE group

19 Long training sequence and SIGNAL-N, green-field, 3 and 4 transmitters
STRN 400 ns cs 200 ns cs 600 ns cs GI21 LTRN 1600 ns cs GI2 GI23 100 ns cs 1700 ns cs GI22 -GI23 -LTRN -GI22 SIGNAL-N For 3 transmitters, the first three rows are used WWiSE group

20 Long training and SIGNAL fields, mixed mode, 2 transmitters
GI24 STRN 400 ns cs LTRN 3100 ns cs GI2 SIGNAL 2 transmitter green-field long training and SIGNAL-N; plus short sequence if 40 MHz WWiSE group

21 Long training and SIGNAL fields, mixed mode, 3 and 4 transmitters
STRN LTRN 400 ns cs GI24 3100 ns cs GI2 SIGNAL 3 or 4 transmitter green-field long training and SIGNAL-N; plus short training if 40 MHz 600 ns cs 200 ns cs GI26 100 ns cs GI25 For 3 transmitters, the first three rows are used WWiSE group

22 Preamble lengths (20 & 40 MHz)
8 Second long 28 4 4x4 3x3 20 2x2 1x1 Total SIGNAL First long Short Configuration Green-field All space-time block codes follow the pattern with the same number of transmit antennas WWiSE group

23 Preamble lengths (20 & 40 MHz), contd.
Mixed mode 0/8 -/8 Second short 8 Third long 4 Second SIGNAL Second long 40/48 4x4 3x3 32/40 2x2 -/40 1x1 Total SIGNAL First long Short Configuration All space-time block codes follow the pattern with the same number of transmit antennas WWiSE group

24 Interpol., filtering, limiter MIMO interleaver Symbol mapper
Add pilots Insert training FEC encoder, puncturer Interpol., filtering, limiter MIMO interleaver Symbol mapper Upconverter, amplifier IFFT D/A Add cyclic extension (guard) WWiSE group

25 Multiplexing across two encoders
Parallel encoders For 40 MHz modes with more than two spatial streams, two parallel BCC encoders are used: Multiplexing across two encoders (round robin) BCC encoder, puncturer To MIMO interleaver Data payload WWiSE group

26 Advanced coding option
Rate-compatible LDPC code with the following parameters: Transmitter block diagram as for BCC modes, except symbol interleaver, rate-compatible puncturing, and tail bits are not used Rate Information bits Block length 1/2 972 1944 2/3 1296 1944 3/4 1458 1944 5/6 1620 1944 WWiSE group

27 LDPC code, contd. There is no change required to SIFS or to any other system timing parameters when the advanced coding option is used The block size of 1944 reduces or eliminates the need for pad bits at the end of a packet Pad bits are eliminated for 2 transmitter operation in 20 MHz channels, and 2x1 and 1x1 in 40 MHz channels The four parity check matrices are derived from the rate-1/2 matrix via row combining The parity check matrices are structured and based on square-shaped building blocks of size 27x27 The parity check matrices are structured to enable efficient encoding WWiSE group

28 Interpol., filtering, limiter MIMO interleaver Symbol mapper
Add pilots Insert training FEC encoder, puncturer Interpol., filtering, limiter MIMO interleaver Symbol mapper Upconverter, amplifier IFFT D/A Add cyclic extension (guard) WWiSE group

29 MIMO interleaving . Parameterized 802.11a-style interleaver
Bit-cycling across NTX transmitters Parameterized a-style interleaver 5 subcarrier shift, same interleaver . TX 0 interleaved bits Coded bits TX 1 interleaved bits Configuration Idepth 108 tones, 1 Tx, 2x1 12 All others 6 Shift of 5 additional subcarriers for each additional antenna WWiSE group

30 Interpol., filtering, limiter MIMO interleaver Symbol mapper
Add pilots Insert training FEC encoder, puncturer Interpol., filtering, limiter MIMO interleaver Symbol mapper Upconverter, amplifier IFFT D/A Add cyclic extension (guard) WWiSE group

31 Space-time block codes and asymmetry
Simple space-time block codes (STBCs) are used to handle asymmetric antenna configurations STBC rate always is an integer - No new PHY rates result from STBC encoding of streams Block size is always two OFDM symbols STBC encoding follows the stream encoding AP STA WWiSE group

32 Space-time block codes
2x1: 3x2: 4x2: 4x3: s1* -s2* Tx 2 s2 s1 Tx 1 t2 t1 s1* -s2* Tx 2 s4 s3 Tx 3 s3* -s4* Tx 4 s2 s1 Tx 1 t2 t1 s1* -s2* Tx 2 s4 s3 Tx 3 s2 s1 Tx 1 t2 t1 s1* -s2* Tx 2 s4 s3 Tx 3 s6 s5 Tx 4 s2 s1 Tx 1 t2 t1 The STBC is applied independently to each OFDM subcarrier WWiSE group

33 Interpol., filtering, limiter MIMO interleaver Symbol mapper
Add pilots Insert training FEC encoder, puncturer Interpol., filtering, limiter MIMO interleaver Symbol mapper Upconverter, amplifier IFFT D/A Add cyclic extension (guard) WWiSE group

34 Power spectral density, 20 MHz
WWiSE group

35 Power spectral density, 40 MHz
WWiSE group

36 MAC features WWiSE group

37 New MAC features The WWiSE proposal builds on e functionality as much as possible, in particular EDCA, HCCA, and Block Ack Goal is backward compatibility and simplicity Block Ack is mandatory in the proposal Bursting and Aggregation: MSDU aggregation PSDU aggregation Increased maximum PSDU length, to 8191 octets HTP burst: sequence of MPDUs from same transmitter, separated by zero interframe spacing (if at same Tx power level and PHY configuration) or 2 usec (otherwise) WWiSE group

38 New MAC features, contd. Block Ack frames ACK policy
Reduce Block Ack overhead Legacy remediation N-STA detection/advertisement Identification of TGn and non-TGn devices and BSSs Legacy Protection mechanisms Additions to existing protection mechanisms 40/20 MHz channel switching Equitable sharing of resources with legacy WWiSE group

39 Discussion WWiSE group

40 100 Mbps throughput See response to CC 27 in 11/04-0877-00-000n
Efficiency upgrades in e and further enhancements in 11n mean that the 45-50% system efficiencies of old systems have evolved to 75-85% in contemporary systems Many such enhancements are commercially available in firmware upgrades from multiple vendors 100 Mbps throughput is achieved from 135 Mbps PHY rate in a variety of setups Both EDCA and HCCA allow this efficiency 100 Mbps throughput may even be achieved from Mbps PHY rate This requires HCCA; EDCA does not suffice WWiSE group

41 100 Mbps throughput, contd. Example scenario: 4000 byte packets
HTP burst transmission, 3 packets Block ack 10%+ for assorted other users, beacons, etc. Data payload Block ack request/ack BSS share, etc. 20 240 4 240 4 240 24 16 32 34 106 Preamble SIGNAL-N SIFS DIFS 960 usec WWiSE group

42 Robustness of modes 2x2 operation achieving 100 Mbps throughput in a 20 MHz channel is feasible Requires high-performance signal processing At highest rates, high performance MIMO detection and/or advanced coding are required 2x3 operation achieving 100 Mbps throughput in a 20 MHz channel is very feasible Achieves throughput targets with MMSE processing and BCC Balance and approach are up to the implementer and beyond the scope of the standard WWiSE group

43 Capacity and operating points, 2x2
Channel model D, NLOS, half-wavelength spacing Curves are envelopes of curves for the 5 rates For each constituent curve, capacity is reduced by outage Baseline 108 is a 2 Tx system with a/g 54 Mbps WWiSE group

44 Optionality of 40 MHz Reasons why 40 MHz channels are not proposed as mandatory: Limited worldwide applicability Europe: clause of ETSI EN V1.2.3 Japan: ARIB STD-T71 The repackaging effect: Halving the number of channels to provide each twice the data rate is of questionable value as an enhancement System and contention overhead: Double the number of users in a single BSS results in increased contention losses; two separate 20 MHz channels generally provide better network capacity, especially with coordinated management Backward compatibility and interoperability: In dense legacy network deployments, contiguous 40 MHz transmission bandwidth may not be available or performance may be impaired WWiSE group

45 References IEEE / n, “WWiSE group PHY and MAC specification,” M. Singh, B. Edwards et al. IEEE / n, “WWiSE proposal response to functional requirements and comparison criteria,” C. Hansen et al. WWiSE group

Download ppt "WWiSE IEEE n Proposal August 13, 2004"

Similar presentations

VSMC MIMO: A Spectral Efficient Scheme for Cooperative Relay in Cognitive Radio Networks 1.

VSMC MIMO: A Spectral Efficient Scheme for Cooperative Relay in Cognitive Radio Networks 1.
802.11 a By Yasir Ateeq. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION TASKS OF TRANSMITTER PACKET FORMAT PREAMBLE SCRAMBLER CONVOLUTIONAL ENCODER PUNCTURER INTERLEAVER.

a By Yasir Ateeq. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION TASKS OF TRANSMITTER PACKET FORMAT PREAMBLE SCRAMBLER CONVOLUTIONAL ENCODER PUNCTURER INTERLEAVER.
Chapter 18 High Throughput and 802.11n 802.11 n history MIMO HT Channels HT PHY HT MAC HT Operation.

Chapter 18 High Throughput and n n history MIMO HT Channels HT PHY HT MAC HT Operation.
TGn Sync An IEEE n Protocol Standard Proposal Alliance PHY Overview

TGn Sync An IEEE n Protocol Standard Proposal Alliance PHY Overview
1 University of Canberra Advanced Communications Topics Television Broadcasting into the Digital Era by: Neil Pickford Lecture 5 DTTB Transmission Error.

1 University of Canberra Advanced Communications Topics Television Broadcasting into the Digital Era by: Neil Pickford Lecture 5 DTTB Transmission Error.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/0abcr0 Submission Sept 2004 Mustafa Eroz, Hughes Network SystemsSlide 1 HNS Proposal for 802.11n Physical Layer Mustafa Eroz, Feng-Wen.

Doc.: IEEE /0abcr0 Submission Sept 2004 Mustafa Eroz, Hughes Network SystemsSlide 1 HNS Proposal for n Physical Layer Mustafa Eroz, Feng-Wen.
NTU Confidential 1 Introduction of TGnSync 802.11n proposal Speaker:Zih-Yin Ding Professor: Tzi-Dar Chiueh September 27 th, 2004.

NTU Confidential 1 Introduction of TGnSync n proposal Speaker:Zih-Yin Ding Professor: Tzi-Dar Chiueh September 27 th, 2004.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/945r0 Submission August 2004 Pen C. Li, et al, Philips Slide 1 Begonya Otal, Job Oostveen, Joerg Habetha, Monisha Ghosh, Pen Li, Ronald.

Doc.: IEEE /945r0 Submission August 2004 Pen C. Li, et al, Philips Slide 1 Begonya Otal, Job Oostveen, Joerg Habetha, Monisha Ghosh, Pen Li, Ronald.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/0909r0 Submission July 2012 Jong S. Baek, AlereonSlide 1 Analysis, simulation and resultant data from a 6-9GHz OFDM MAC/PHY Date:

Doc.: IEEE /0909r0 Submission July 2012 Jong S. Baek, AlereonSlide 1 Analysis, simulation and resultant data from a 6-9GHz OFDM MAC/PHY Date:
Submission August 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/0935r1 S. Coffey, et al., WWiSE group Slide 1 WWiSE IEEE 802.11n Proposal August 13, 2004 Airgo Networks, Bermai,

Submission August 2004 doc.: IEEE /0935r1 S. Coffey, et al., WWiSE group Slide 1 WWiSE IEEE n Proposal August 13, 2004 Airgo Networks, Bermai,
August 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/0951r1 Submission S. Coffey, et al., WWiSE group Slide 1 WWiSE Group Partial Proposal on Turbo Codes August 13, 2004 Airgo.

August 2004 doc.: IEEE /0951r1 Submission S. Coffey, et al., WWiSE group Slide 1 WWiSE Group Partial Proposal on Turbo Codes August 13, 2004 Airgo.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/0929r1 Submission August 2004 Patrik Eriksson et. al., WaveBreaker ABSlide 1 A “High Throughput” Partial Proposal Patrik Eriksson,

Doc.: IEEE /0929r1 Submission August 2004 Patrik Eriksson et. al., WaveBreaker ABSlide 1 A “High Throughput” Partial Proposal Patrik Eriksson,
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/0929r0 Submission August 2004 Patrik Eriksson et. al., WaveBreaker ABSlide 1 A “High Throughput” Partial Proposal Patrik Eriksson,

Doc.: IEEE /0929r0 Submission August 2004 Patrik Eriksson et. al., WaveBreaker ABSlide 1 A “High Throughput” Partial Proposal Patrik Eriksson,
802.11n MIMO-OFDM Standard  IEEE 802.11n group  MIMO-OFDM  Increased performance  Transmitter  MAC Enhancements  Results.

802.11n MIMO-OFDM Standard  IEEE n group  MIMO-OFDM  Increased performance  Transmitter  MAC Enhancements  Results.
Submission September 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/0935r3 S. Coffey, et al., WWiSE group Slide 1 WWiSE IEEE 802.11n Proposal September 16, 2004 Airgo Networks,

Submission September 2004 doc.: IEEE /0935r3 S. Coffey, et al., WWiSE group Slide 1 WWiSE IEEE n Proposal September 16, 2004 Airgo Networks,
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/229r1 Submission March 2004 Alexandre Ribeiro Dias - Motorola LabsSlide 1 Multiple Antenna OFDM solutions for enhanced PHY Presented.

Doc.: IEEE /229r1 Submission March 2004 Alexandre Ribeiro Dias - Motorola LabsSlide 1 Multiple Antenna OFDM solutions for enhanced PHY Presented.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/0929r2 Submission September 2004 Patrik Eriksson et. al., WaveBreaker ABSlide 1 A “High Throughput” Partial Proposal Patrik Eriksson,

Doc.: IEEE /0929r2 Submission September 2004 Patrik Eriksson et. al., WaveBreaker ABSlide 1 A “High Throughput” Partial Proposal Patrik Eriksson,
Submission August 2004 doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/0935r1 S. Coffey, et al., WWiSE group Slide 1 WWiSE IEEE 802.11n Proposal August 13, 2004 Airgo Networks, Bermai,

Submission August 2004 doc.: IEEE /0935r1 S. Coffey, et al., WWiSE group Slide 1 WWiSE IEEE n Proposal August 13, 2004 Airgo Networks, Bermai,
S , Postgraduate Course in Radio Communications

S , Postgraduate Course in Radio Communications
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-04/1404r0 Submission November 2004 John Ketchum, et al, QualcommSlide 1 High-Throughput Enhancements for 802.11: Features and Performance.

Doc.: IEEE /1404r0 Submission November 2004 John Ketchum, et al, QualcommSlide 1 High-Throughput Enhancements for : Features and Performance.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google