1. Project Title
Subtitle: make sure to specify that project is an improvement project (see SQUIRES elaboration article
Presenter(s)
Date of presentation

2. Problem Description Current Knowledge Rationale for Project Methods
Agenda
Problem Description
Current Knowledge
Rationale for Project
Methods
Measures and Analysis
Results
Discussion
** Lighten the text of the ones that you are NOT discussing (either because they have already been discussed or because they will come after you)

3. Problem Description and Available Knowledge

4. Colorectal cancer and screening
National statistics
State statistics

5. Colorectal cancer and screening
Region (NE Ohio/County/Akron) statistics
IMC Statistics

6. Literature Review and Rationale for Project
** This review should note what has and has not worked in the past (both internal to the IMC and external in the literature)

7. Previously in the IMC…

8. In the literature

9. Project Charter Problem Statement Goal Statement Business Case
Project Timeline
5/25/16
6/24/16
7/22/16
8/19/16
9/16/16
Project Scope
Current Scope:
Process Starts –
Process Ends –
Team Roles
Project Sponsor —
Team Lead —
Process Engineer —
Core Team Members —
Subject Matter Experts —
Control
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Define

10. Methods

11. Context
The Internal Medicine Center is an internal medicine residency based clinic that serves ~10,000 active patients in an urban, underserved area
(keep expanding about population, trainees, etc.)

12. Intervention #1
Description of the intervention in sufficient detail that others could reproduce it
Specifics of the team involved in the work (review project charter)

13. Reliability and validity
Approach chosen for assessing the impact of the intervention (statistical models, survey results over time, etc.) including the assessment of any unintended impact of the intervention
Approach used to establish whether the observed outcomes were due to the intervention(s). (was there a control group?)

14. Measures
Measures chosen for studying processes and outcomes of the intervention; include rationale for choosing them, their operational definitions, and their validity and reliability
How do these measures contribute to the success, failure, efficiency, and cost of the project?
Methods employed for assessing completeness and accuracy of data

15. Analysis
What statistical models will be used to draw inferences from the data as well as look for variation in the data, including the effects of time?
*** talk to Mike Oravec/Emily George

16. Ethical Considerations
Ethical aspects of implementing and studying the intervention and how they were addressed, including, but not limited to, formal ethics review and potential conflicts of interest

17. One-column slide with bar chart example
Summa Health Sample Preso

18. Results

19. Results
Initial steps of the intervention and their evolution over time. If there was a second intervention done, repeat “Study of the intervention” in slides above- you can put the last intervention done in a PDSA cycle format for quick review (see slides further down PPT)
Details of the process measures and outcome
Contextual elements that interacted with the intervention
Observed associations between outcomes, interventions, and relevant contextual elements
Unintended consequences such as unexpected benefits, problems, failures, or costs associated with the interventions
Details about missing data

20. One-column slide with bar chart example
Summa Health Sample Preso

21. Second column wide with pie chart example
Bullet one, use tab key or “Decrease/Increase List Level” button, sentence case, 18pt Calibri, SH Gray
Bullet two, use tab key or “Decrease/Increase List Level” button, sentence case, 18pt Calibri, SH Gray
Bullet three, use tab key or “Decrease/Increase List Level” button, sentence case, 18pt Calibri, SH Gray
Summa Health Sample Preso

22. Second column narrow with example of table
Bullet one, use tab key or “Decrease/Increase List Level” button, sentence case, 18pt Calibri, SH Gray
Bullet two, use tab key or “Decrease/Increase List Level” button, sentence case, 18pt Calibri, SH Gray
Bullet three, use tab key or “Decrease/Increase List Level” button, sentence case, 18pt Calibri, SH Gray
Summa Health Sample Preso

23. PDSA #1
PLAN

24. PDSA #1 DO

25. PDSA #1
STUDY

26. PDSA #1
ACT

27. Discussion

28. Summary
Key findings, including relevance to the rationale and specific aims
Particular strengths of the project

29. Interpretation
Nature of the association between the intervention(s) and the outcomes
Comparison of results with findings from other publications
Impact of the project on people and systems
Reasons for any differences between observed and anticipated outcomes, including the influence of context
Costs and strategic trade-offs, including opportunity costs

30. Limitations Limits to the generalizability of the work
Factors that might have limited internal validity such as confounding, bias, or imprecision in the design, methods, measurement, or analysis
Efforts made to minimize and adjust for limitations

31. Conclusions Usefulness of the work Sustainability
Potential for spread to other contexts
Implications for practice and for further study in the field
Suggested next steps

32. Questions?

33. Thank you