Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAvis Parker Modified over 5 years ago
1
2014/15 Evaluation Summary October 6, 2015 Jordan Harris
2
Teacher Evaluation 4th year of the Troy Educator Appraisal Model (TEAM). TEAM has undergone modification each year through a collaborative process using stakeholders from different disciplines throughout the District . Continued utilization of Teachscape for management of evaluations.
3
Teacher Evaluation (cont.)
State-Mandated Performance Ratings: Highly Effective Effective Minimally Effective Ineffective
4
Teacher Evaluation (cont.)
Highly Effective 672 Teachers (2014/15) 573 Teachers (2013/14) 305 Teachers (2012/13) Effective 106 Teachers (2014/15) 184 Teachers (2013/14) 447 Teachers (2012/13)
5
Teacher Evaluation (cont.)
Minimally Effective 5 Teachers (2014/15) 9 Teachers (2013/14) 4 Teachers (2012/13) Ineffective 1 Teachers (2014/15) 2 Teachers (2013/14)
6
Administrator Evaluation
4th year of more intensive evaluation process for TSD administrators (Principals, Assistant Principals, Directors). 2nd year of new process based upon Reeves’ Leadership Performance Matrix. Goals-based aspects are included.
7
Administrator Evaluation (cont.)
Highly Effective 26 Administrators ( ) 26 Administrators ( ) Effective 6 Administrators ( ) 10 Administrators ( ) Minimally Effective 1 Administrator ( ) 1 Administrator ( )
8
Administrator Evaluation (cont.)
Continued Work for 2015/16: Move towards goal-oriented evaluation process for District-Wide Administrators and for Non-Instructional Administrators. These administrators will, in turn, work within their respective departments on established departmental and/or building level goals.
9
QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.