1. 20
Phylogeny

2. Overview: Investigating the Evolutionary History of Life
Legless lizards and snakes evolved from different lineages of lizards with legs
Legless lizards have evolved independently in several different groups through adaptation to similar environments 2

3. Figure 20.1
Figure 20.1 What kind of organism is this? 3

4. No limbs Eastern glass lizard Monitor lizard Iguanas ANCESTRAL Snakes
Figure 20.2
No limbs
Eastern glass lizard
Monitor lizard
Iguanas
ANCESTRAL
LIZARD
(with limbs)
Snakes
Figure 20.2 Convergent evolution of limbless bodies
No limbs
Geckos 4

5. Phylogeny is the evolutionary history of a species or group of related species
The discipline of systematics classifies organisms and determines their evolutionary relationships 5

6. Concept 20.1: Phylogenies show evolutionary relationships
Taxonomy is the ordered division and naming of organisms 6

7. Binomial Nomenclature
In the 18th century, Carolus Linnaeus published a system of taxonomy based on resemblances
Two key features of his system remain useful today: two-part names for species and hierarchical classification 7

8. The two-part scientific name of a species is called a binomial
The first part of the name is the genus
The second part, called the specific epithet, is unique for each species within the genus
The first letter of the genus is capitalized, and the entire species name is italicized
Both parts together name the species (not the specific epithet alone) 8

9. Hierarchical Classification
Linnaeus introduced a system for grouping species in increasingly broad categories
The taxonomic groups from narrow to broad are species, genus, family, order, class, phylum, kingdom, and domain 9

10. Kingdom: Animalia Domain: Bacteria Domain: Archaea Domain: Eukarya
Figure 20.3
Species: Panthera pardus
Genus: Panthera
Family: Felidae
Order: Carnivora
Class: Mammalia
Figure 20.3 Linnaean classification
Phylum: Chordata
Kingdom:
Animalia
Domain:
Bacteria
Domain:
Archaea
Domain:
Eukarya 10

11. A taxonomic unit at any level of hierarchy is called a taxon
The broader taxa are not comparable between lineages
For example, an order of snails has less genetic diversity than an order of mammals 11

12. Linking Classification and Phylogeny
Systematists depict evolutionary relationships in branching phylogenetic trees 12

13. Order Family Genus Species Felidae Panthera pardus (leopard) Panthera
Figure 20.4
Order
Family
Genus
Species
Felidae
Panthera
pardus
(leopard)
Panthera
Taxidea
taxus
(American
badger)
Taxidea
Carnivora
Mustelidae
Lutra lutra
(European
otter)
Lutra 1
Figure 20.4 The connection between classification and phylogeny
Canis
latrans
(coyote)
Canidae
Canis 2
Canis
lupus
(gray wolf) 13

14. Linnaean classification and phylogeny can differ from each other
Systematists have proposed that classification be based entirely on evolutionary relationships 14

15. Sister taxa are groups that share an immediate common ancestor
A phylogenetic tree represents a hypothesis about evolutionary relationships
Each branch point represents the divergence of two taxa from a common ancestor
Sister taxa are groups that share an immediate common ancestor 15

16. A polytomy is a branch from which more than two groups emerge
A rooted tree includes a branch to represent the most recent common ancestor of all taxa in the tree
A basal taxon diverges early in the history of a group and originates near the common ancestor of the group
A polytomy is a branch from which more than two groups emerge 16

17. where lineages diverge Taxon A
Figure 20.5
Branch point:
where lineages diverge
Taxon A 3
Taxon B
Sister
taxa 4
Taxon C 2
Taxon D 5
Taxon E
ANCESTRAL
LINEAGE 1
Taxon F
Figure 20.5 How to read a phylogenetic tree
Basal
taxon
Taxon G
This branch point
represents the common
ancestor of taxa A−G.
This branch point forms a
polytomy: an unresolved
pattern of divergence. 17

18. What We Can and Cannot Learn from Phylogenetic Trees
Phylogenetic trees show patterns of descent, not phenotypic similarity
Phylogenetic trees do not generally indicate when a species evolved or how much change occurred in a lineage
It should not be assumed that a taxon evolved from the taxon next to it 18

19. Applying Phylogenies
Phylogeny provides important information about similar characteristics in closely related species
Phylogenetic trees based on DNA sequences can be used to infer species identities
For example: A phylogeny was used to identify the species of whale from which “whale meat” originated 19

20. (Southern Hemisphere)
Figure 20.6
Results
Minke
(Southern Hemisphere)
Unknowns 1a,
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Minke
(North Atlantic)
Unknown 9
Humpback
Unknown 1b
Blue
Figure 20.6 Inquiry: What is the species identity of food being sold as whale meat?
Unknowns 10,
11, 12, 13
Fin 20

21. Concept 20.2: Phylogenies are inferred from morphological and molecular data
To infer phylogeny, systematists gather information about morphologies, genes, and biochemistry of living organisms
The similarities used to infer phylogenies must result from shared ancestry 21

22. Morphological and Molecular Homologies
Phenotypic and genetic similarities due to shared ancestry are called homologies
Organisms with similar morphologies or DNA sequences are likely to be more closely related than organisms with different structures or sequences 22

23. Sorting Homology from Analogy
When constructing a phylogeny, systematists need to distinguish whether a similarity is the result of homology or analogy
Homology is similarity due to shared ancestry
Analogy is similarity due to convergent evolution 23

24. Convergent evolution occurs when similar environmental pressures and natural selection produce similar (analogous) adaptations in organisms from different evolutionary lineages 24

25. Figure 20.7
Figure 20.7 Convergent evolution of analogous burrowing characteristics 25

26. Bat and bird wings are homologous as forelimbs, but analogous as functional wings
Analogous structures or molecular sequences that evolved independently are also called homoplasies
Homology can be distinguished from analogy by comparing fossil evidence and the degree of complexity
The more complex two similar structures are, the more likely it is that they are homologous 26

27. Evaluating Molecular Homologies
Molecular homologies are determined based on the degree of similarity in nucleotide sequence between taxa
Systematists use computer programs when analyzing comparable DNA segments from different organisms 27

28. 1 C C A T C A G A G T C C 2 C C A T C A G A G T C C Figure 20.8-1
Figure Aligning segments of DNA (step 1) 28

29. 1 C C A T C A G A G T C C 2 C C A T C A G A G T C C Deletion 1 C C A T
Figure 1
C C A T
C A G A
G T C C 2
C C A T
C A G A
G T C C
Deletion 1
C C A T
C A G A
G T C C 2
C C A T
C A G A
G T C C
G T A
Insertion
Figure Aligning segments of DNA (step 2) 29

30. 1 C C A T C A G A G T C C 2 C C A T C A G A G T C C Deletion 1 C C A T
Figure 1
C C A T
C A G A
G T C C 2
C C A T
C A G A
G T C C
Deletion 1
C C A T
C A G A
G T C C 2
C C A T
C A G A
G T C C
G T A
Insertion 1
C C A T
C A
A G T C C
Figure Aligning segments of DNA (step 3) 2
G T A
C C A T
C A
A G T C C G 30

31. 1 C C A T C A G A G T C C 2 C C A T C A G A G T C C Deletion 1 C C A T
Figure 1
C C A T
C A G A
G T C C 2
C C A T
C A G A
G T C C
Deletion 1
C C A T
C A G A
G T C C 2
C C A T
C A G A
G T C C
G T A
Insertion 1
C C A T
C A
A G T C C
Figure Aligning segments of DNA (step 4) 2
G T A
C C A T
C A
A G T C C G 1
C C A T
C A
A G T C C 2
G T A G
C C A T
C A
A G T C C 31

32. Shared bases in nucleotide sequences that are otherwise very dissimilar are called molecular homoplasies 32

33. A C G G A T A G T C C A C T A G G C A C T A T C A C C G A C A G G T
Figure 20.9
A C G
G A T
A G T
C C A
C T A
G G C
A C T A
T C A
C C G
A C A
G G T
C T T
T G A
C T A G
Figure 20.9 A molecular homoplasy 33

34. Concept 20.3: Shared characters are used to construct phylogenetic trees
Once homologous characters have been identified, they can be used to infer a phylogeny 34

35. Cladistics Cladistics classifies organisms by common descent
A clade is a group of species that includes an ancestral species and all its descendants
Clades can be nested in larger clades, but not all groupings of organisms qualify as clades 35

36. A valid clade is monophyletic, signifying that it consists of the ancestor species and all its descendants 36

37. (a) Monophyletic group (clade) (b) Paraphyletic group
Figure 20.10
(a) Monophyletic group
(clade)
(b) Paraphyletic group
(c) Polyphyletic group A A A 1 1 B
Group I B B
Group III C C C D D D E E
Group II E 2 2
Figure Monophyletic, paraphyletic, and polyphyletic groups F F F G G G 37

38. (a) Monophyletic group (clade)
Figure 20.10a
(a) Monophyletic group
(clade) A 1 B
Group I C D
Figure 20.10a Monophyletic, paraphyletic, and polyphyletic groups (part 1: monophyletic) E F G 38

39. A paraphyletic grouping consists of an ancestral species and some, but not all, of the descendants39

40. (b) Paraphyletic group
Figure 20.10b
(b) Paraphyletic group A B C D
Figure 20.10b Monophyletic, paraphyletic, and polyphyletic groups (part 2: paraphyletic) E
Group II 2 F G 40

41. A polyphyletic grouping consists of various taxa with different ancestors41

42. (c) Polyphyletic group
Figure 20.10c
(c) Polyphyletic group A 1 B
Group III C D
Figure 20.10c Monophyletic, paraphyletic, and polyphyletic groups (part 3: polyphyletic) E 2 F G 42

43. Shared Ancestral and Shared Derived Characters
In comparison with its ancestor, an organism has both shared and different characteristics 43

44. A shared ancestral character is a character that originated in an ancestor of the taxon
A shared derived character is an evolutionary novelty unique to a particular clade
A character can be both ancestral and derived, depending on the context 44

45. Inferring Phylogenies Using Derived Characters
When inferring evolutionary relationships, it is useful to know in which clade a shared derived character first appeared 45

46. TAXA Lancelet (outgroup) (outgroup) Lancelet Lamprey Leopard Bass Frog
Figure 20.11
TAXA
Lancelet
(outgroup)
(outgroup)
Lancelet
Lamprey
Leopard
Bass
Frog
Turtle
Lamprey
Vertebral
column
(backbone) 1 1 1 1 1
Bass
Vertebral
column
Hinged jaws 1 1 1 1
Frog
Four
walking legs
Hinged jaws
CHARACTERS 1 1 1
Turtle
Four walking legs
Amnion 1 1
Figure Constructing a phylogenetic tree
Amnion
Hair 1
Leopard
Hair
(a) Character table
(b) Phylogenetic tree 46

47. TAXA (outgroup) Lancelet Lamprey Leopard Bass Turtle Frog Vertebral
Figure 20.11a
TAXA
(outgroup)
Lancelet
Lamprey
Leopard
Bass
Turtle
Frog
Vertebral
column
(backbone) 1 1 1 1 1
Hinged jaws 1 1 1 1
Four
walking legs
CHARACTERS 1 1 1
Figure 20.11a Constructing a phylogenetic tree (part 1: character table)
Amnion 1 1
Hair 1
(a) Character table 47

48. Lancelet (outgroup) Lamprey Bass Vertebral column Frog Hinged jaws
Figure 20.11b
Lancelet
(outgroup)
Lamprey
Bass
Vertebral
column
Frog
Hinged jaws
Turtle
Four walking legs
Figure 20.11b Constructing a phylogenetic tree (part 2: phylogenetic tree)
Amnion
Leopard
Hair
(b) Phylogenetic tree 48

49. The outgroup is a group that has diverged before the ingroup
An outgroup is a species or group of species that is closely related to the ingroup, the various species being studied
The outgroup is a group that has diverged before the ingroup
Systematists compare each ingroup species with the outgroup to differentiate between shared derived and shared ancestral characteristics 49

50. Characters shared by the outgroup and ingroup are ancestral characters that predate the divergence of both groups from a common ancestor 50

51. Phylogenetic Trees with Proportional Branch Lengths
In some trees, the length of a branch can reflect the number of genetic changes that have taken place in a particular DNA sequence in that lineage 51

52. Drosophila Lancelet Zebrafish Frog Chicken Human Mouse Figure 20.12
Figure Branch lengths can represent genetic change
Mouse 52

53. In other trees, branch length can represent chronological time, and branching points can be determined from the fossil record 53

54. Drosophila Lancelet Zebrafish Frog Chicken Human Mouse 542 251
Figure 20.13
Drosophila
Lancelet
Zebrafish
Frog
Chicken
Human
Figure Branch lengths can indicate time
Mouse
PALEOZOIC
MESOZOIC
CENOZOIC
542
251
65.5 Present
Millions of years ago 54

55. Maximum Parsimony
Systematists can never be sure of finding the best tree in a large data set
They narrow possibilities by applying the principle of maximum parsimony 55

56. Computer programs are used to search for trees that are parsimonious
Maximum parsimony assumes that the tree that requires the fewest evolutionary events (appearances of shared derived characters) is the most likely
Computer programs are used to search for trees that are parsimonious 56

57. Three phylogenetic hypotheses:
Figure 20.14
Technique
1/C I I
III
1/C II
III II
1/C
III II I
1/C
1/C
Species I
Species II
Species III
3/A
2/T
3/A
Three phylogenetic hypotheses: I I
III
2/T
3/A
4/C I I
III II
III II II
III II
4/C
4/C
2/T
III II I
3/A 4/C
2/T 4/C
2/T 3/A
III II I
Site
Figure Research method: applying parsimony to a problem in molecular systematics 1 2 3 4
Results
Species I C T A T I I
III
Species II C T T C II
III II
Species III A G A C
III II I
Ancestral sequence A G T T
6 events
7 events
7 events 57

58. I I III II III II III II I Species I Species II Species III
Figure 20.14a
Technique
Species I
Species II
Species III
Three phylogenetic hypotheses:
Figure 20.14a Research method: applying parsimony to a problem in molecular systematics (part 1: hypothesis) I I
III II
III II
III II I 58

59. Technique Site 1 2 3 4 Species I C T A T Species II C T T C
Figure 20.14b
Technique
Site 1 2 3 4
Species I C T A T
Species II C T T C
Species III A G A C
Figure 20.14b Research method: applying parsimony to a problem in molecular systematics (part 2: table)
Ancestral sequence A G T T 59

60. Technique 1/C I I III 1/C II III II 1/C III II I 1/C 1/C 3/A 2/T 3/A I
Figure 20.14c
Technique
1/C I I
III
1/C II
III II
1/C
III II I
1/C
1/C
3/A
2/T
3/A I I
III
2/T
Figure 20.14c Research method: applying parsimony to a problem in molecular systematics (part 3: comparison)
3/A
4/C II
III II
4/C
4/C
2/T
III II I
3/A 4/C
2/T 4/C
2/T 3/A 60

61. Results I I III II III II III II I 6 events 7 events 7 events
Figure 20.14d
Results I I
III II
III II
III II I
Figure 20.14d Research method: applying parsimony to a problem in molecular systematics (part 4: results)
6 events
7 events
7 events 61

62. Phylogenetic Trees as Hypotheses
The best hypotheses for phylogenetic trees fit the most data: morphological, molecular, and fossil
Phylogenetic hypotheses are modified when new evidence arises 62

63. Phylogenetic bracketing allows us to predict features of ancestors and their extinct descendants based on the features of closely related living descendants
For example, phylogenetic bracketing allows us to infer characteristics of dinosaurs based on shared characters in modern birds and crocodiles 63

64. Lizards and snakes Crocodilians Ornithischian dinosaurs Common
Figure 20.15
Lizards
and snakes
Crocodilians
Ornithischian
dinosaurs
Common
ancestor of
crocodilians,
dinosaurs,
and birds
Saurischian
dinosaurs
Figure A phylogenetic tree of birds and their close relatives
Birds 64

65. The fossil record supports nest building and brooding in dinosaurs
Birds and crocodiles share several features: four-chambered hearts, song, nest building, and brooding
These characteristics likely evolved in a common ancestor and were shared by all of its descendants, including dinosaurs
The fossil record supports nest building and brooding in dinosaurs 65

66. Figure 20.16
Figure A crocodile guards its nest. 66

67. (b) Artist’s reconstruction of the dinosaur’s posture based on
Figure 20.17
Front
limb
Hind
limb
Eggs
Figure Fossil support for a phylogenetic prediction
(b) Artist’s reconstruction of the
dinosaur’s posture based on
the fossil findings
(a) Fossil remains of Oviraptor
and eggs 67

68. (a) Fossil remains of Oviraptor and eggs
Figure 20.17a
Front
limb
Hind
limb
Figure 20.17a Fossil support for a phylogenetic prediction (part 1: fossil)
Eggs
(a) Fossil remains of Oviraptor and eggs 68

69. (b) Artist’s reconstruction of the dinosaur’s posture based on
Figure 20.17b
Figure 20.17b Fossil support for a phylogenetic prediction (part 2: artist’s reconstruction)
(b) Artist’s reconstruction of the
dinosaur’s posture based on
the fossil findings 69

70. Concept 20.4: Molecular clocks help track evolutionary time
To extend molecular phylogenies beyond the fossil record, we must make an assumption about how molecular change occurs over time 70

71. Molecular Clocks
A molecular clock uses constant rates of evolution in some genes to estimate the absolute time of evolutionary change
The number of nucleotide substitutions in related genes is assumed to be proportional to the time since they last shared a common ancestor 71

72. Individual genes vary in how clocklike they are
Molecular clocks are calibrated by plotting the number of genetic changes against the dates of branch points known from the fossil record
Individual genes vary in how clocklike they are 72

73. Divergence time (millions of years)
Figure 20.18 90 60
Number of mutations 30
Figure A molecular clock for mammals 30 60 90
120
Divergence time (millions of years) 73

74. Differences in Clock Speed
Some mutations are selectively neutral and have little or no effect on fitness
Neutral mutations should be regular like a clock
The neutral mutation rate is dependant on how critical a gene’s amino acid sequence is to survival 74

75. Potential Problems with Molecular Clocks
Molecular clocks do not run as smoothly as expected if mutations were selectively neutral
Irregularities result from natural selection in which some DNA changes are favored over others
Estimates of evolutionary divergences older than the fossil record have a high degree of uncertainty
The use of multiple genes may improve estimates 75

76. Applying a Molecular Clock: Dating the Origin of HIV
Phylogenetic analysis shows that HIV is descended from viruses that infect chimpanzees and other primates
HIV spread to humans more than once
Comparison of HIV samples shows that the virus evolved in a very clocklike way
Application of a molecular clock to one strain of HIV suggests that that strain spread to humans during the 1930s 76

77. Animation: Class Schemes
Right click slide / Select play

78. Index of base changes between
Figure 20.19
0.15
HIV
Index of base changes between
HIV gene sequences
0.10
Range
Adjusted best-fit
line (accounts for
uncertain dates of
HIV sequences
0.05
Figure Dating the origin of HIV-1
1900
1920
1940
1960
1980
2000
Year 78

79. Concept 20.5: New information continues to revise our understanding of evolutionary history
Recently, systematists have gained insight into the very deepest branches of the tree of life through analysis of DNA sequence data 79

80. From Two Kingdoms to Three Domains
Early taxonomists classified all species as either plants or animals
Later, five kingdoms were recognized: Monera (prokaryotes), Protista, Plantae, Fungi, and Animalia
More recently, the three-domain system has been adopted: Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukarya
The three-domain system is supported by data from many sequenced genomes 80

81. Euglenozoans Forams Diatoms Ciliates Domain Eukarya Red algae
Figure 20.20
Euglenozoans
Forams
Diatoms
Ciliates
Red algae
Domain Eukarya
Green algae
Land plants
Amoebas
Fungi
Animals
Nanoarchaeotes
Archaea
Domain
Methanogens
COMMON
ANCESTOR
OF ALL LIFE
Thermophiles
Figure The three domains of life
Proteobacteria
(Mitochondria)*
Chlamydias
Spirochetes
Domain Bacteria
Gram-positive
bacteria
Cyanobacteria
(Chloroplasts)* 81

82. Euglenozoans Forams Diatoms Ciliates Domain Eukarya Red algae
Figure 20.20a
Euglenozoans
Forams
Diatoms
Ciliates
Red algae
Domain Eukarya
Green algae
Land plants
Figure 20.20a The three domains of life (part 1: eukarya)
Amoebas
Fungi
Animals 82

83. Nanoarchaeotes Archaea Domain Methanogens Thermophiles Figure 20.20b
Figure 20.20b The three domains of life (part 2: archaea) 83

84. Proteobacteria (Mitochondria)* Chlamydias Domain Bacteria Spirochetes
Figure 20.20c
Proteobacteria
(Mitochondria)*
Chlamydias
Spirochetes
Domain Bacteria
Gram-positive
bacteria
Figure 20.20c The three domains of life (part 3: bacteria)
Cyanobacteria
(Chloroplasts)* 84

85. Domains Bacteria and Archaea are single-celled prokaryotes
The three-domain system highlights the importance of single-celled organisms in the history of life
Domains Bacteria and Archaea are single-celled prokaryotes
Only three lineages in the domain Eukarya are dominated by multicellular organisms, kingdoms Plantae, Fungi, and Animalia 85

86. The Important Role of Horizontal Gene Transfer
The tree of life suggests that eukaryotes and archaea are more closely related to each other than to bacteria
The tree of life is based largely on rRNA genes, which have evolved slowly, allowing detection of homologies between distantly related organisms
Other genes indicate different evolutionary relationships 86

87. Horizontal gene transfer complicates efforts to build a tree of life
There have been substantial interchanges of genes between organisms in different domains
Horizontal gene transfer is the movement of genes from one genome to another
Horizontal gene transfer occurs by exchange of transposable elements and plasmids, viral infection, and fusion of organisms
Horizontal gene transfer complicates efforts to build a tree of life 87

88. Horizontal gene transfer may have been common enough that the early history of life is better depicted by a tangled web than a branching tree 88

89. Domain Eukarya Archaea Domain Domain Bacteria Fungi Plantae
Figure 20.21
Fungi
Domain Eukarya
Plantae
Chloroplasts
Methanogens
Archaea
Domain
Ancestral cell
populations
Mitochondria
Thermophiles
Figure A tangled web of life
Cyanobacteria
Proteobacteria
Domain Bacteria 89

90. Domain Eukarya Fungi Plantae Ancestral cell populations Figure 20.21a
Figure 20.21a A tangled web of life (part 1: eukarya) 90

91. Archaea Domain Domain Bacteria Methanogens Thermophiles Ancestral cell
Figure 20.21b
Methanogens
Archaea
Domain
Thermophiles
Ancestral cell
populations
Cyanobacteria
Proteobacteria
Domain Bacteria
Figure 20.21b A tangled web of life (part 2: archaea and bacteria) 91

92. (a) (b) (c) A B A B D C C C B D A A Figure 20.UN01
Figure 20.UN01 Concept check 20.1, p. 385
(a)
(b)
(c) 92

93. Reptiles (including birds) OTHER TETRAPODS Dimetrodon Cynodonts
Figure 20.UN02
Reptiles
(including birds)
OTHER
TETRAPODS
Dimetrodon
Cynodonts
Figure 20.UN02 Concept check 20.3, p. 392
Mammals 93

94. Brown bear Polar bear American black bear Asian black bear Sun bear
Figure 20.UN03
Brown bear 7
Polar bear 4
American black bear 6
Asian black bear 5 3
Sun bear 2
Figure 20.UN03 Skills exercise: interpreting data in a phylogenetic tree
Sloth bear 1
Spectacled bear
Giant panda 94

95. Branch point Taxon A Most recent Taxon B common ancestor Sister taxa
Figure 20.UN04
Branch point
Taxon A
Most recent
common
ancestor
Taxon B
Sister taxa
Taxon C
Taxon D
Taxon E
Figure 20.UN04 Summary of key concepts: evolutionary relationships
Polytomy
Taxon F
Taxon G
Basal taxon 95

96. A A A B B B C C C D D D E E E F F F G G G Monophyletic group
Figure 20.UN05
Monophyletic group
Polyphyletic group A A A B B B C C C D D D E E E
Figure 20.UN05 Summary of key concepts: shared characters F F F G G G
Paraphyletic group 96

97. Salamander Lizard Goat Human Figure 20.UN06
Figure 20.UN06 Test your understanding, question 5
Human 97

98. Figure 20.UN07
Figure 20.UN07 Test your understanding, question 8 98