Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDavid Andreasen Modified over 5 years ago
1
#1 A. Brutus was justified in killing Caesar and should not be punished for his actions.
#1 B. Brutus was not justified in killing Caesar and should be punished for his actions. #2 A. Julius Caesar was ambitious to a fault. (The two speeches may not be used for evidence.) #2 B. Julius Caesar was not ambitious to a fault. (The speeches may not be used for evidence.)
2
Three reasons to support your position. Do not begin your argument.
On a separate piece of paper, neatly and in pen, blue or black ink, provide the following information: The subject of your assignment and the assigned position your group will take. #1 A. Brutus was justified in killing Caesar and should not be punished for his actions. #1 B. Brutus was not justified in killing Caesar and should be punished for his actions. #2 A. Julius Caesar was ambitious to a fault. (The two speeches may not be used for evidence.) #2 B. Julius Caesar was not ambitious to a fault. (The speeches may not be used for evidence.) Three reasons to support your position. Do not begin your argument. Do not present detailed evidence or discussion of your reasons. This work is due today!
3
Each team will receive the reasons being developed by an opposing team.
Develop your argument based on refuting the reasons of the opposing team. Feel free to add information to defend your position beyond refuting the opposition. Draw closure to your work. Develop an outline of your argument to be submitted on Thursday, 1/18. Submit also the reasons of the opposing team. Plan to present your argument Thursday, 1/18.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.