Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Adult #01, female 50 yr.

Published byKory Henderson Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Adult #01, female 50 yr."— Presentation transcript:

1 Adult #01, female 50 yr

2 Supplementary material
Automated artefact rejection for event-related potentials using independent component analysis D. V. M. Bishop University of Oxford For each participant (10 Adults, 10 Children), two slides show the activations from independent component analysis, with red titles denoting ICs that are selected for removal by one or more of the automated artefact removal algorithms. The third slide for each participant shows the mean amplitude of the ERP and the inter-trial coherence (ITC) for the unprocessed data and after the two methods of artefact rejection have been applied. A fuller explanation is given in the manuscript describing the study.

3 Adult #01

4 Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz
Adult #01, female 50 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 9.4 µv 9.7 µv Trial rejection 8.2 µv 8.4 µv ICA rejection 5.1 µv 5.0 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

5 Adult #02, female 47 yr

6 Adult #02

7 Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz
Adult #02, female 47 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 10.8 µv 11.2 µv Trial rejection 7.7 µv 8.2 µv ICA rejection 5.3 µv 5.0 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

8 Adult #03, female 47 yr

9 Adult #03

10 Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz
Adult #03, female 47 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 9.1 µv 8.7 µv Trial rejection 8.4 µv 7.9 µv ICA rejection 7.3 µv 6.8 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

11 Adult #04, male 40 yr

12 Adult #04

13 Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz
Adult #04, male 40 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 14.9 µv 15.7 µv Trial rejection 12.8 µv 13.0 µv ICA rejection 7.4 µv 6.7 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

14 Adult #05, female 45 yr

15 Adult #05

16 Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz
Adult #05, female 45 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 14.9 µv 17.3 µv Trial rejection 12.0 µv 13.5 µv ICA rejection 6.6 µv 7.0 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

17 Adult #06, female 43 yr

18 Adult #06

19 Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz
Adult #06, female 43 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 8.2 µv 8.5 µv Trial rejection 7.0 µv 6.8 µv ICA rejection 6.3 µv 5.9 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

20 Adult #07, male 54 yr

21 Adult #07

22 Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz
Adult #07, male 54 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 11.5 µv 12.8 µv Trial rejection 9.5 µv 10.2 µv ICA rejection 7.7 µv 8.4 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

23 Adult #08, female 42 yr

24 Adult #08

25 Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz
Adult #08, female 42 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 16.8 µv 18.5 µv Trial rejection 14.2 µv 14.5 µv ICA rejection 5.8 µv 5.5 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

26 Adult #09, male 48 yr

27 Adult #09

28 Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz
Adult #09, male 48 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 8.6 µv 8.4 µv Trial rejection 8.3 µv 8.0 µv ICA rejection 6.5 µv 6.1 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

29 Adult #10, female 55 yr

30 Adult #10

31 Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz
Adult #10, female 55 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 15.2 µv 17.4 µv Trial rejection 13.9 µv 16.1 µv ICA rejection 7.1 µv 7.0 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

32 Child #01, female 8 yr

33 Child #01

34 Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz
Child #01, female 8 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 18.1 µv 18.8 µv Trial rejection 17.2 µv 17.7 µv ICA rejection 14.5 µv 15.3 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

35 Child #02, female 8 yr

36 Child #02

37 Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz
Child #02, female 8 yr Child #02 Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 17.5 µv 21.0 µv Trial rejection 15.8 µv 18.0 µv ICA rejection 9.3 µv 9.9 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

38 Child #03, male 11 yr

39 Child #03

40 Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz
Child #03, male 11 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 13.6 µv 15.1 µv Trial rejection 13.0 µv 13.3 µv ICA rejection 11.0 µv 11.5 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

41 Child #04, female 8 yr

42 Child #04

43 Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz
Child #04, female 8 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 21.0 µv 23.1 µv Trial rejection 17.9 µv 20.4 µv ICA rejection 14.6 µv 17.2 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

44 Child #05, male 12 yr

45 Child #05

46 Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz
Child #05, male 12 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 17.8 µv 19.4 µv Trial rejection 15.8 µv 17.3 µv ICA rejection 12.7 µv 13.9 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

47 Child #06, male 11 yr

48 Child #06

49 Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz
Child #06, male 11 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 17.1 µv 19.2 µv Trial rejection 16.0 µv 17.6 µv ICA rejection 17.5 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

50 Child #07, female 9 yr

51 Child #07

52 Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz
Child #07, female 9 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 31.1 µv 30.5 µv Trial rejection 30.2 µv 28.9 µv ICA rejection 13.1 µv 14.5 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

53 Child #08, female 14 yr

54 Child #08

55 Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz
Child #08, female 14 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 12.1 µv 14.6 µv Trial rejection 11.0 µv 11.7 µv ICA rejection 5.4 µv 5.9 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

56 Child #09, female 11 yr

57 Child #09

58 Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz
Child #09, female 11 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 20.2 µv 21.8 µv Trial rejection 18.3 µv 19.7 µv ICA rejection 15.6 µv 16.9 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

59 Child #10, male 8 yr

60 Child #10

61 Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz
Child #10, male 8 yr Trial-by-trial SD of mean amplitude P1 N1 Unprocessed 25.0 µv 30.5 µv Trial rejection 23.3 µv 26.8 µv ICA rejection 18.3 µv 19.8 µv Mean inter-trial coherence, theta range, at Fz Averaged ERP at Fz

Download ppt "Adult #01, female 50 yr."

Similar presentations

The National Certificate in Adult Numeracy Level 2 Skills for Life Support Strategies Module 8: Averages and test preparation.

The National Certificate in Adult Numeracy Level 2 Skills for Life Support Strategies Module 8: Averages and test preparation.
All slides © S. J. Luck, except as indicated in the notes sections of individual slides Slides may be used for nonprofit educational purposes if this copyright.

All slides © S. J. Luck, except as indicated in the notes sections of individual slides Slides may be used for nonprofit educational purposes if this copyright.
Perceptual Coherence in Adults with Congenital and Acquired Hearing Losses Andrea Pittman, PhD Arizona State University Supported by a grant from NIDCD.

Perceptual Coherence in Adults with Congenital and Acquired Hearing Losses Andrea Pittman, PhD Arizona State University Supported by a grant from NIDCD.
Figure 1a. Average number of eggs laid by female bean beetles (with and without access to water) on mung beans. A total of 6 independent trials were performed.

Figure 1a. Average number of eggs laid by female bean beetles (with and without access to water) on mung beans. A total of 6 independent trials were performed.
Company Presentation. Slide subtitle Heading Conclusion Title […] ‒ […] ― […] 2.

Company Presentation. Slide subtitle Heading Conclusion Title […] ‒ […] ― […] 2.
Contrasts & Inference - EEG & MEG Outi Tuomainen & Rimona Weil 17.5.2005 mfd.

Contrasts & Inference - EEG & MEG Outi Tuomainen & Rimona Weil mfd.
All slides © S. J. Luck, except as indicated in the notes sections of individual slides Slides may be used for nonprofit educational purposes if this copyright.

All slides © S. J. Luck, except as indicated in the notes sections of individual slides Slides may be used for nonprofit educational purposes if this copyright.
Artifact (artefact) reduction in EEG – and a bit of ERP basics CNC, 19 November 2014 Jakob Heinzle Translational Neuromodeling Unit.

Artifact (artefact) reduction in EEG – and a bit of ERP basics CNC, 19 November 2014 Jakob Heinzle Translational Neuromodeling Unit.
SPECIFICITY OF ERP TO CHANGE OF EMOTIONAL FACIAL EXPRESSION. Michael Wright Centre for Cognition and Neuroimaging, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH,

SPECIFICITY OF ERP TO CHANGE OF EMOTIONAL FACIAL EXPRESSION. Michael Wright Centre for Cognition and Neuroimaging, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH,
Formal Probability. The sum of probabilities for all possible outcomes of a trial must equal 1. Example: Flipping a Coin S = {Heads, Tails} P(H) = 0.5.

Formal Probability. The sum of probabilities for all possible outcomes of a trial must equal 1. Example: Flipping a Coin S = {Heads, Tails} P(H) = 0.5.
1. Understand how to determine a country’s level of development. 2. Understand how education levels affect economic development. 3. Understand how to.

1. Understand how to determine a country’s level of development. 2. Understand how education levels affect economic development. 3. Understand how to.
Children of Parents Incarcerated in Alameda County Jails KATIE KRAMER, MSW/MPH THE BRIDGING GROUP.

Children of Parents Incarcerated in Alameda County Jails KATIE KRAMER, MSW/MPH THE BRIDGING GROUP.
$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300.

$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300.
Human Development Traps and Economic Growth David Mayer Foulkes CIDE, Mexico.

Human Development Traps and Economic Growth David Mayer Foulkes CIDE, Mexico.
All slides © S. J. Luck, except as indicated in the notes sections of individual slides Slides may be used for nonprofit educational purposes if this copyright.

All slides © S. J. Luck, except as indicated in the notes sections of individual slides Slides may be used for nonprofit educational purposes if this copyright.
Departments in Business Business Name 1 Business Name 2.

Departments in Business Business Name 1 Business Name 2.
Instructions These lessons are interactive and require your participation. Please follow the instructions on each slide. Here are a few common symbols.

Instructions These lessons are interactive and require your participation. Please follow the instructions on each slide. Here are a few common symbols.
N400-like semantic incongruity effect in 19-month-olds: Processing known words in picture contexts Manuela Friedrich and Angela D. Friederici J. of cognitive.

N400-like semantic incongruity effect in 19-month-olds: Processing known words in picture contexts Manuela Friedrich and Angela D. Friederici J. of cognitive.
Sec. 3.5: Contingency Tables A contingency table is a way of organizing data to make finding conditional probabilities easier.

Sec. 3.5: Contingency Tables A contingency table is a way of organizing data to make finding conditional probabilities easier.
Remember Playing perfect black jack – the probability of winning a hand is.498 What is the probability that you will win 8 of the next 10 games of blackjack?

Remember Playing perfect black jack – the probability of winning a hand is.498 What is the probability that you will win 8 of the next 10 games of blackjack?

Similar presentations

Ads by Google