Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKornélia Szilágyi Modified over 5 years ago
1
Methadone vs. Morphine in the Treatment of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Jonathan Davis, MD Chief of Newborn Medicine The Floating Hospital for Children at Tufts Medical Center Professor of Pediatrics Tufts University School of Medicine
2
Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS)
NAS is a complex disorder with many factors contributing to the incidence & severity There is significant variability in NAS expression, especially with the need and response to treatment Concerns about safety and efficacy of NAS treatments; no pharmacologic therapy is approved by the FDA Significant uncertainty - who to treat, when to treat, how to treat, how to wean, and the optimal agent(s) Current treatments of NAS are costly & require lengthy hospitalization - we need to establish best practices
3
Improving Outcome in NAS
Randomized, double-blind, intent to treat clinical trial Infants born to mothers receiving methadone or buprenorphine for an OUD or opioids for chronic pain (CoC issued by FDA) Treatment initiated if Finnegan scores ≥ 8 for 2 consecutive scores (4h apart), or ≥ 12 for 1 score Infants randomized to morphine (preservative free) or methadone (compounded powder) Length of hospital stay and treatment were measured Bayley III Neurodevelopmental Examinations at months
4
Methods Concerns by FDA over 10% alcohol content in commercial methadone solution Required methadone powder to be compounded (DEA approval) Needed to hire GLP Laboratory (Boston Analytical) Testing protocol developed and approved by FDA Took 1 year and approximately $20,000 to complete Solution needed to be stable for 2 weeks after compounding Extensive stability testing (pH, Assay, Appearance, Impurities and Microbial Enumeration Testing and Absence of Specified Organisms) Primary outcome – relative mean number of days; adjusted for by site and maternal opioid
6
Methadone:Morphine Relative Mean Number of Days
Length of Stay: 14% lower with methadone treatment (95% CI 0, 26%); difference of 2.9 days (p=0.046) Length of Stay Due to NAS: 14% lower with methadone treatment (95% CI 3, 23%); difference of 2.7days (p=0.01) Length of Treatment: 14% lower in methadone treated infants (95% CI 3, 27%); a difference of 2.3 days (p=0.02) Phenobarbital Use: 17.2% with methadone treatment vs. 29.7% with morphine (p=0.07)
7
Conclusions Short term outcomes were better with 3x/day methadone than 6x/day morphine A safe neonatal formulation for methadone is needed Only 13 adverse events were recorded (equal between groups) and responded well to dosage decreases Longer term follow-up shows no differences Most mothers refused to participate – didn’t like methadone or confidentiality language used in consent Data will be submitted to FDA for approval of these drugs for the treatment of NAS
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.