Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Volume 154, Issue 6, Pages (September 2013)

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Volume 154, Issue 6, Pages (September 2013)"— Presentation transcript:

1 Volume 154, Issue 6, Pages 1326-1341 (September 2013)
Lck Availability during Thymic Selection Determines the Recognition Specificity of the T Cell Repertoire  François Van Laethem, Anastasia N. Tikhonova, Leonid A. Pobezinsky, Xuguang Tai, Motoko Y. Kimura, Cécile Le Saout, Terry I. Guinter, Anthony Adams, Susan O. Sharrow, Günter Bernhardt, Lionel Feigenbaum, Alfred Singer  Cell  Volume 154, Issue 6, Pages (September 2013) DOI: /j.cell Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

2 Cell  , DOI: ( /j.cell ) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

3 Figure 1 Effect of Coreceptor-free and Coreceptor-Associated Lck on Thymic Selection (A) hCD2-driven transgenic constructs encoding wild-type (top) and C20A/C23A mutant (bottom) Lck proteins. (B) Abrogation of Lck binding to coreceptor proteins. Thymocyte lysates were precipitated with anti-CD4 or anti-CD8α and blotted for Lck. Numbers indicate total Lck band intensities relative to B6 (set equal to 1.0). Data represent four experiments. (C) CD5 levels on thymocytes relative to control B6 mice (mean ± SE, n = 7 mice/group). (D and E) Numbers of γδ (D) and αβ (E) LN T cells (mean ± SE, n = 9 mice/group). (F) Numbers above profiles indicate thymus cellularity (mean ± SE, n = 10 mice/group). (G) Ligand specificity of αβT cells in mixed lymphocyte reactions as assessed by proliferation-induced CFSE dye dilution on day 4. Numbers represent percentage of cells that underwent at least one division. Data represent 3 experiments. ∗∗∗∗p < ; ∗∗∗p < 0.001; ∗∗p < See also Figures S1 and S2. Cell  , DOI: ( /j.cell ) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

4 Figure 2 Lck Sequestration and TCR Signaling in the Thymus
(A) CD5 on thymocytes relative to B6 (set at 100%). Mean ± SE, n = 3 mice/group. (B) hCD2-driven transgenic constructs encoding wild-type (444) and tailless (44T) CD4 proteins named for their extra-cellular, transmembrane, and cytosolic domains. (C) Lck is sequestered away from TCR on thymocytes by the cytosolic tail of coreceptor proteins. Thymocyte lysates were precipitated by anti-CD4 or anti-TCRβ and blotted for Lck or TCRζ. Data represent three experiments. (D) In vitro TCR induced calcium mobilization. Thymocytes were loaded at 31°C with Indo-1 and coated with biotinylated anti-TCR (5 μg/ml) either alone or together with biotinylated anti-CD4 (1 μg/ml). Crosslinking by avidin (black arrow) and addition of ionomycin (red arrow) are indicated. Data represent two experiments. (E) In vivo signaling of thymocytes. CD5 on thymocytes is shown relative to control B6 mice (mean ± SE, n = 10 mice/group). (F) In vivo signaling of thymocytes assessed biochemically. Lysates were precipitated with anti-TCRζ and blotted for phospho-zeta, ZAP70, or TCRζ. Data represent two experiments. ∗∗∗∗p < ; ∗∗∗p < Cell  , DOI: ( /j.cell ) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

5 Figure 3 Thymic Selection of MHC-Independent αβTCR in the Absence of Both MHC and Coreceptors (A) TCR expression on thymocytes from transgenic host mice (QuadKORAG2KOBcl-2Tg). Black lines indicate TCR expression, gray lines indicate control staining. Numbers in panels indicate mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). Data represent five experiments. (B) Thymocyte profiles from host transgenic mice expressing transgenic TCR. Numbers in CD5 histograms indicate CD5 MFI. Numbers in CD69 and CCR7 histograms indicate frequency of positive cells. Thymus cellularity is shown as mean ± SE (n = 5 mice/group). (C) Numbers of αβ LN T cells in TCR transgenic mice (mean ± SE, n = 5 mice/group). (D) Expression of CD62L and CD44 on αβT cells from TCR transgenic mice. Data represent three experiments. (E and F) Lymphopenia-induced proliferation triggered by A11 and B12A TCR is dependent on CD155 recognition. A11 and B12A αβT cells were CFSE labeled and injected (5 × 106 cells/mouse) into CD155+/+ or CD155−/− lymphopenic hosts for 1 week. Numbers in histograms (E) represent the percentage of cells that underwent at least two divisions and summarized in (F). Mean ± SE of three mice/group. ∗∗∗∗p < ; ∗p < See also Figure S3. Cell  , DOI: ( /j.cell ) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

6 Figure 4 Identification of CD155 as the Thymic Selecting Ligand
(A) In vivo positive selection signaling by A11 and B12A TCR requires CD155. Numbers in CD5 histograms indicate MFI. Numbers in CD69 and CCR7 histograms indicate frequency of positive cells. Thymus cellularity is shown as mean ± SE (n = 5 mice/group). (B) CD69 versus CCR7 profiles of A11 and B12A thymocytes. Numbers indicate frequency of mature CD69−CCR7hi thymocytes (n = 5 mice/group). (C) Numbers of αβ LN T cells (mean ± SE of 5 mice/group). (D) CD155 expression by electronically sorted thymic elements by quantitative PCR (left panel) and surface protein expression (right panel). Mean ± SE (n = 3). (E) Thymic elements that induce CD155-specific thymic selection. Four groups of mixed donor bone marrow chimeras were constructed with 1:1 mixtures of A11 and B12F donor cells and injected into irradiated host (QuadKORAG2KO) mice that expressed or lacked CD155. Numbers of A11 αβT cells in LN were determined after 8–10 weeks. Each circle represents one mouse (n = 4). ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗∗∗p < ; NS, not significant. See also Figure S4. Cell  , DOI: ( /j.cell ) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

7 Figure 5 Positive Selection Signaling by MHC-Independent TCR in Coreceptor-Sufficient Mice Lacking MHC (A) Thymocyte profiles. Numbers in CD4 versus CD8α plots indicate cell frequencies. Numbers in CD5 histograms indicate MFI. Numbers in CD69 and CCR7 histograms indicate frequency of positive cells. Thymus cellularity is shown as mean ± SE (n = 6 mice/group). (B) Numbers of αβ LN T cells (mean ± SE, n = 6 mice/group). (C) Positive selection signaling occurs in DN thymocytes and is ligand specific. CD4 versus CD8α profiles (top) and CD5 and CCR7 expression on CD24hiDN thymocytes (bottom). Data represent four experiments. (D) Early positive selection signaling is TCR specific. CD5 and CCR7 expression on gated DN and DP thymocytes. Data represent four experiments. (E) Early positive selection signaling is inhibited by early CD4 expression. CCR7 and CD24 expression on thymocytes from B12A and B12A.444 transgenic mice. Data represent four individual mice/group. See also Figure S5. Cell  , DOI: ( /j.cell ) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

8 Figure 6 Effect on Thymic Selection of Coreceptor-Associated and Coreceptor-free Lck (A) Numbers of αβ LN T cells in coreceptor-deficient (left side) or coreceptor-sufficient (right side) mice (mean ± SE, n = 3 mice/group). (B) Numbers of αβ LN T cells in kinase-deficient mice (mean ± SE, n = 3 mice/ group). ND, not done. (C) Profiles of thymocytes with endogenous Lck (black lines) or Lckmut (colored lines) proteins. Numbers in CD4 versus CD8α plots indicate cell frequencies. Numbers in CD69 histograms indicate frequency of positive cells and is summarized in right panels (mean ± SE, n = 3 mice/group). (D) Numbers of αβ LN T cells in TCR transgenic mice with endogenous Lck (black bar) or Lckmut (gray bar) proteins. Reconstitution by Lckmut proteins relative to endogenous Lck proteins (set at 100%) is displayed in the right panel (mean ± SE, n = 3 mice/group). ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p <. 01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗p < ; NS, not significant. Cell  , DOI: ( /j.cell ) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

9 Figure 7 Role of Evolutionarily Conserved CDR2β Residues in Thymic Selection by an MHC-Independent TCR (A) Thymocyte profiles from MHC-deficient mice expressing A11 TCR whose TCRβ chain was wild-type or contained a point mutation in CDR2, either Y48A or E54A. Numbers in TCRβ and CD5 histograms indicate MFI. Numbers in CD69 and CCR7 histograms indicate frequency of positive cells. Numbers in CD69 versus CCR7 plots indicate frequency of mature cells. Thymus cellularity is shown as mean ± SE (n = 4 mice/group). (B) Assessment of in vivo signaling of thymocytes. Unstimulated thymocyte lysates were precipitated with anti-TCRζ and blotted for phospho-zeta, ZAP70, or TCRζ. Data represent two experiments. (C) LN αβT cell numbers (mean ± SE, n = 4 mice/group). ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗∗∗p < Cell  , DOI: ( /j.cell ) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

10 Figure S1 Lck Sequestration Model of MHC Restriction, Related to Figure 1 In preselection DP thymocytes, all available membrane Lck is bound to CD4 and CD8 coreceptor proteins. Consequently, only TCR that co-engage their thymic selecting ligand together with one or the other coreceptor can access coreceptor-associated Lck to initiate TCR signaling of thymic selection. Because CD4 and CD8 coreceptors bind to pMHC-II and pMHC-I complexes, respectively, only MHC-restricted TCR can signal thymic selection, resulting in generation of an exclusively MHC-restricted TCR repertoire. In contrast, MHC-independent TCR that engage non-MHC selecting ligands in the thymus are unable to signal thymic selection because they cannot access Lck. However, in the absence of coreceptors, Lck is not sequestered so that MHC-independent TCR can signal thymic selection. Cell  , DOI: ( /j.cell ) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

11 Figure S2 Signaling of Thymic Selection by Lckwt and Lckmut Proteins in Mice Containing the Bcl-2Tg, Related to Figure 1 (A) Thymocyte profiles from mice containing only Lckwt or Lckmut proteins. Thymus cellularity is indicated by the numbers on top of each plot which display the mean ± SE of nine mice in each group. Data are representative of 9 experiments. (B) Numbers of γδ and αβ T cells in lymph nodes of Bcl-2Tg mice containing only Lckwt or Lckmut proteins. Mean ± SE (n = 9 mice/group). ∗∗∗p < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗p < Cell  , DOI: ( /j.cell ) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

12 Figure S3 αβTCR and Thymocytes from QuadKO Mice, Related to Figure 3
(A) Reactivity against MHCKO stimulators of two T-hybridomas (named A11 and B12) that were derived from QuadKOBcl-2Tg mice. Data are expressed relative to stimulation with immobilized anti-TCRβ (1 μg/ml) and represent the mean ± SE of triplicate cultures. Data are representative of 3 experiments. (B) TCR expressed by A11 and B12 T cell hybridomas. One TCRαβ (named A11) was cloned from the A11 T-hybridoma; two TCRαβ (B12A and B12F which utilized different TCRα but the identical TCRβ) were cloned from the B12 T-hybridoma. TCR sequences were analyzed using IMGT software and summarized as displayed. (C) CD155 is the ligand for both A11 and B12A TCR. TCR-negative 4G4 cells that had been retrovirally transduced to express A11, B12A, and B12F TCR were assessed for their reactivity against MHCKO and MHCKOCD155KO stimulator cells. Data are representative of 2 experiments. Each data point represents the mean (±SEM) of triplicate cultures. (D) Profiles of thymocytes expressing MHC-restricted transgenic TCR in the presence and absence of MHC and coreceptors. Thymocyte profiles from wild-type mice (black lines) and QuadKOBcl-2Tg mice (red lines) expressing AND or P14 MHC-restricted TCR transgenes. Numbers in the CD5 profiles indicate CD5 MFI. Numbers in the CD69 and CCR7 profiles indicated the frequencies of CD69+ and CCR7+ thymocytes. Thymus cellularity is indicated on top of the CD4/CD8 profiles. Cell  , DOI: ( /j.cell ) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

13 Figure S4 Expression of Genes Characteristic of Innate and γδ T Cells, Related to Figure 4 Expression of Zbtb16 mRNA which encodes PLZF and Sox13 was determined by quantitative PCR in the indicated sorted cell populations. A11 and B12A LN T cells were from QuadKORAGKOBcl-2Tg host mice. Data represent mean ± SE of triplicate samples in two independent experiments. Cell  , DOI: ( /j.cell ) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

14 Figure S5 Thymocyte Differentiation and Lineage-Specific Gene Expression Stimulated by MHC-Independent and MHC-Restricted TCR Transgenes, Related to Figure 5 (A) Five stages of thymocyte development (annotated I through V) were defined according to CD69 and CCR7 expression as indicated. CD4 versus CD8α expression was plotted for thymocytes at each of these developmental stages. Ungated thymocyte plots are shown in extreme right panels. (B) Expression of helper- and effector-lineage genes in LN T cells generated by A11 and B12A MHC-independent TCR in MHCKORAGKOBcl-2Tg mice. CD4+ and CD8+ LN T cells were purified by electronic sorting and assessed for expression of the indicated genes by quantitative PCR. Data represent mean ± SE of triplicate samples in two independent experiments. (C) Early Lck sequestration impairs γδT cell generation. γδ T cell numbers in the LNs of QuadKO, 444. QuadKO, and 44T. QuadKO mice. Mean ± SE (n = 10 mice/group). ∗∗∗∗p < Cell  , DOI: ( /j.cell ) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions


Download ppt "Volume 154, Issue 6, Pages (September 2013)"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google