Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Dissemination and Sustained Use of an Outpatient Clinical Decision System with High Use Rates, High Clinician Satisfaction, and Positive Impact on Quality.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Dissemination and Sustained Use of an Outpatient Clinical Decision System with High Use Rates, High Clinician Satisfaction, and Positive Impact on Quality."— Presentation transcript:

1 Dissemination and Sustained Use of an Outpatient Clinical Decision System with High Use Rates, High Clinician Satisfaction, and Positive Impact on Quality of Care JoAnn M. Sperl-Hillen MD1,2,3; A. Lauren Crain PhD2; Jay R. Desai PhD2; Karen L. Margolis MD2,3; Heidi L. Ekstrom MA2,3; Deepika Appana BS2; Christina M. Wood BS2; Rashmi Sharma BS2; Patrick J. O’Connor MD, MA, MPH1,2,3 1HealthPartners Medical Group, Minneapolis, MN; 2HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, MN; 3HealthPartners Center for Chronic Care Innovation, Minneapolis, MN

2 2 Background EHRs have potential to improve quality of chronic disease outcomes, but those gains have rarely been realized The challenges of Clinical Decision Support (CDS) Systems Integrating CDS with care workflow (the right time and place to be useful). Increasing office efficiency rather than burden Remaining patient centered rather than disease specific. Prioritizing thousands of evidence-based recommendations Updating and maintaining recommendations consistent with evidence and national guidelines Formatting the CDS to meet the needs of both patients and professionals (patient engagement and shared decision making) Interoperability, dissemination and scalability

3 Objectives of this presentation
3 Objectives of this presentation Describe the performance of a point-of-care clinical decision support (CDS) system proven in RCTs to improve important patient outcomes Outline successful dissemination procedures to several external care system clients (inside and outside of research projects) Discuss facilitators and barriers to dissemination and scalability

4 What Wizard Clinical Decision Support Does
4 What Wizard Clinical Decision Support Does IDENTIFIES HIGH-RISK PATIENTS AUTOMATICALLY CV Wizard identifies those with high reversible CV risk and targets their poorly controlled CV risk factors. PERSONALIZED REAL-TIME CLINICAL DECISICION SUPPORT (CDS) CV Wizard provides CDS for both the patient and provider through the EHR at patient encounters. PRIORITIZES CLINICAL ACTIONS BASED ON BENEFIT TO PATIENT CV Wizard calculates 10-year ASCVD risk and potential absolute reversible risk (RR) for each clinical domain (lipids, BP, glycemic control, weight, tobacco use, and aspirin), and then prioritizes them. Goals are individualized and priorities dampened if already on maximal treatment. PROMOTES SHARED DECISION MAKING CV Wizard displays treatment options for the six CV risk factors based on other current therapy, most recent lab and BP values, distance from goal, and co- morbidities. Also displays safety alerts for drugs or clinical conditions.

5 Technology and Data Flow
5

6 CDS Development Support
6 CDS Development Support

7 Example of CV Wizard©- Provider version
7

8 New Design – Patient version of Priorities Wizard©
8 New Design – Patient version of Priorities Wizard©

9 New Design – Provider version of Priorities Wizard©
9 New Design – Provider version of Priorities Wizard©

10 CV Wizard© Significantly Reduced 10-year Cardiovascular Risk Over the 14 Month Observation Period (RCT 2015) 10 P<.001 REF: Sperl-Hillen JM, Crain AL, Margolis KL, Ekstrom HL, Appana DX, Amundson G, Sharma R, Desai JR, O’Connor PJ. Clinical Decision Support Directed to Primary Care Patients and Providers Reduces Cardiovascular Risk: A Randomized Trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc Sep;25(9):

11 CV Wizard© Impact on Clinician Communication with Patients
11 Clinician Survey Results  Intervention Control P-value Use calculated CV risk while seeing patients 73% 28% 0.006 Feel well prepared to discuss CV risk reduction priorities with patients 98% 78% 0.03 Able to provide accurate advice on aspirin for primary prevention 75% 48% 0.02 Often discuss CV risk reduction with patients 60% 30% 0.06

12 Clinician Satisfaction with CV Wizard©
12 Clinician Satisfaction with CV Wizard©

13 DM Wizard Impact on Diabetes Quality Results of 2012 RCT
13 DM Wizard Impact on Diabetes Quality Results of 2012 RCT Glucose control (A1C levels) was improved by .3%. Each 1% drop in A1C is associated with a 30% lower risk of eye, kidney, and peripheral neuropathy complications). BP goals were each achieved by 5% more patients. Better blood pressure control translates to lower risk of heart attacks and strokes and diabetes complications. LDL cholesterol levels were not changed, but significant improvement was observed in both clinics that received and did not receive Wizard.

14 The Impact of CV Wizard© in Studies
14 Wizard use rates are high. Providers use Wizard in over 75% of targeted visits Providers have reported high satisfaction with the Wizard. 98% feel prepared to discuss risk reduction with patients and agree the tool improved risk factor control. 95% thought the tool was useful for shared decision making. Improved Quality of Care A1Cs BP control 10-year ASCVD Risk Scores Wizard spread to other care systems In 2018, used by more than 130 clinics, evaluates 40,000 patient encounters a day (9 million per year) in 12 states. Essentia (randomized clinics) OCHIN – federally health care qualified clinics (safety nets) in 10 states PN primary care system wide HP primary care system wide HP specialty departments – Endocrinology, cardiology, psychiatry, diabetes educators, MTMs Altru from 2014 – contract ended January 2019

15 Implementation and Maintenance Process
15 PHASE ACTIVITY AVERAGE DURATION CLIENT INVOLVEMENT HP TEAM INVOLVEMENT IMPLEMENTATION 6 MONTHS MINIMUM LEADERSHIP ENGAGEMENT & APPROVAL 1 MONTH *QUALITY OR PROJECT LEAD *PRIMARY CARE LEADERSHIP *IT LEADERSHIP *LEGAL DEPARTMENT *WIZARD TEAM PM & DIRECTOR *LEGAL SECURITY VALIDATION LEGAL APPROVAL BAA, BSS, SERVICE AGREEMENT 2 MONTHS DATA MAPPING – MEDS, LABS, ALLERGIES, DIAGNOSTIC CODES, 3 MONTHS EPIC PROGRAMMERS WIZARD TEAM PROGRAMMERS WEB, EPIC, AND UI EPIC PROGRAMMING – CUSTOM BUILD PACKAGE, BPA, PRINTER MAPPING WEB SERVICE PROGRAMMING – INTERCONNECT, URL WHITE LIST CLINICAL REVIEW OF CDS QUALITY OR PROJECT LEAD CLINICIAN LEADS WIZARD TEAM MANAGER CDS CONTENT EXPERTS COMMUNICATION AND TRAINING OF CLINIC STAFF MAINTENANCE TRACKING USE AND PRINT RATES (AUTOMATED) ONGONG RECIPRICOL FEEDBACK AND COMMUNICATION ONGOING REVIEW AND APPROVE CDS UPDATES AND CHANGES

16 16 Example HealthPartners Institute Budget to Implement and Maintain CV Wizard in a Care System Staff / Resource Estimated Annual Salary & Benefits Web 10% $20,000 Epic Programmer 10% $15,000 Project Manager / 13% $17,000 Physician Content 8% $22,500 Indirect costs 10% $7,500 Total Cost for CV Wizard $82,000

17 17 Example of HP and PN Primary Care System Use Data for One Month (December 2018) 89,569 Wizard Web-service calls age 18-75 68,999 unique encounters with a Web-service call 59,221 unique patients with Web-service call 10,815 encounters (16%) meet criteria for high CV risk (BPA to print) 50% printing rate of CDS tools at eligible encounters

18 Facilitators of Dissemination
18 Facilitators of Dissemination Care system interest in quality care improvement Payer interest in helping a care system improve quality Clinician champions Minimal impact on workflow or provider time Tools for shared decision making Favorable effects on patient outcomes Positive patient perceptions Ability to standardize care and rapidly translate new evidence/guidelines into practice

19 Barriers to Dissemination
19 Cost of implementation and maintenance and lack of a clearly understood ROI from the care system perspective Limited ability and bandwidth for our research organization to devote to dissemination and difficulty finding a corporate entity to market and manage dissemination and maintenance of the CDS system Interoperability challenges (a lot of effort required to map data) Need for recipient care system programmers with skill and/or time to implement call external web services (e.g. using interconnect) access SOAP based web service, program BPA to open and/or print based on web-service response, allow display of URL within the EHR, Map printers properly to printing interfaces from web browser Data privacy and security concerns (network and external server security) – although this has been well vetted and approved by multiple clients. This is not the biggest issue.

20 Implications for Research
20 Implications for Research This CDS system had high use rates, high PCP satisfaction, and significantly improved care in targeted adults and children. After 10 years of NIH-funded development and expansion, several potentially remediable factors limit widespread dissemination.


Download ppt "Dissemination and Sustained Use of an Outpatient Clinical Decision System with High Use Rates, High Clinician Satisfaction, and Positive Impact on Quality."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google