1. Validation of the Japanese Version of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System– Revised 
Naosuke Yokomichi, MD, Tatsuya Morita, MD, Akihiro Nitto, MA, Naoko Takahashi, MD, Shingo Miyamoto, MD, Hiroyuki Nishie, MD, Junji Matsuoka, MD, PhD, Hiroki Sakurai, MD, Tatsuhiko Ishihara, MD, Masanori Mori, MD, Yoko Tarumi, MD, Asao Ogawa, MD, PhD 
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 
Volume 50, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
DOI: /j.jpainsymman
Copyright © 2015 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Terms and Conditions

2. Fig. 1
Correlation between the total scores of the ESAS-r and ECOG performance status. Vertical lines indicate 95% CIs, and crossbars indicate mean scores. The total scores of the ESAS-r are significantly different between the groups of patients with a different performance status (ANOVA, P < 0.0001). ESAS-r = Edmonton Symptom Assessment System–revised; ECOG = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; ANOVA = analysis of variance.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management  , DOI: ( /j.jpainsymman )
Copyright © 2015 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Terms and Conditions