Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

THE DESIGN OF THE MACROSTRUCTURE

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "THE DESIGN OF THE MACROSTRUCTURE"— Presentation transcript:

1 THE DESIGN OF THE MACROSTRUCTURE
Martina Dal Molin AY 2015/2016

2 Agenda Introduction Units grouping Units’ dimension

3 Introduction (1/2) Individual positions are defined according to specialization, formalization, training and indoctrination. How to group these individual positions? What should be the dimension of these units?

4 Introduction (2/2) The process of creating units has two effects on the organzation: - formal authority - hierarchy It is a progressive process – bottom up: Organizational mission and objectives tasks and activities to be accomplished tasks are translated into positions (top- down) Individual positions are organized into units (i.e. the macrostructure) (bottom-up) Allocation of the decision-making power

5 UNITS GROUPING AY 2016/2017

6 Units grouping (1/2) The creation of units favors the introduction of coordination inside the organization: COMMON SUPERVISION COMMON RESOURCES COMMON PERFORMANCE INDICATORS MUTUAL ADJUSTEMENT

7 Units grouping (2/2) WHICH COORDINATION MECHANISMS? DIRECT SUPERVISION
OUTPUT STANDARDIZATION MUTUAL ADJUSTEMENT

8 How to group: basis for units
There are six methods to create or group organizational units: Knowledge, ability and skills Work processes and functions Time Output Clients Geographical positions

9 Knowledge ability and skills
ABILITIES AND SKILLS OF PEOPLE

10 Work processes and functions
PROCESS OR ACTIVITIES CARRIED OUT BY PEOPLE

11 WHEN THE ACTIVITY ID CARRIED OUT
Time WHEN THE ACTIVITY ID CARRIED OUT

12 OUTPUT OR SERVICES PROVIDED BY EACH UNIT

13 Clients TYPE(S) OF CLIENT

14 Geographical location
GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION IN WHICH THE ORGANIZATION WORKS

15 Units grouping: two macro-categories
There are six methods to create or group organizational units: Knowledge, ability and skills Work processes and functions Time Output Clients Geographical positions FUNCTIONAL GROUPING MARKET GROUPING

16 Market grouping and functional grouping
Functions, knowledge, processes used by the organization to realize products and to deliver services Characteristics of the markets in which the organization works

17 Functional grouping Focus on: Weaknesses High fomalization
Work flow processes interdependencies Economies of scale Weaknesses Focus on processes and not on organizational objectives Need to find a coordination mechanism Burocracy: High fomalization More structured strategic apex Strong hierarchy

18 Market grouping Focus on: Weaknesses (more or less) independent units
Mutual adjustment and direct supervision are «inside» each unit Less formalization Coordination between specialized functions Fexibility Weaknesses Hihgher need for resources Not able to use economies of scale

19 Find grouping basis in the different parts

20 DEFINING UNITS’ DIMENSION
AY 2016/2017

21 Stating the problem Addressing the problem of the dimension means answering the following questions: How many positions should be grouped? How many people should be controlled by the same manager? How should be the extent of mangers’ control? Which form should the organization have? Vertical or flt and enlarged? IT IS NOT ONLY A PROBLEM OF CONTROL, BECAUSE OTHER FACTORS AFFECT THE CHOICE OF THE UNITS’ DIMENSION

22 The 5 coordination mechanisms are, more or less, interchangeable
Functional grouping The 5 coordination mechanisms are, more or less, interchangeable therefore Variations on units’ dimension by looking at the coordination mechanisms employed Two propositions

23 Proposition 1: Standardization
«The higher is the standardization, the higher is the dimension of the unit» If processes are standardized, less managerial direct supervision is required and, therefore, the unit could be bigger If capabilities are standardized, and the higher is the training of workers, less managerial direct supervision is required and, therefore, the unit could be bigger If outputs are standardized, less managerial direct supervision is required with respect to the outputs control and, therefore, the unit could be bigger

24 Proposition 2: Mutual adjustment
«The higher is the mutual adjustment, the lower is the dimension of the unit» If tasks are interdependent, workers need frequent contacts with the manager, who must have time to control workers and to speak with workers If tasks are interdependent and they need mutual adjustement, workers should establish face-to-face contact

25 Higher units’ dimension
Which factors favor a higher units’ dimension? Standardization Similarity of tasks and activities Need for autonomy for workers Need to reduce the distorsion of information

26 Lower units’ dimension
Which factors favor a lower units’ dimension? Need for direct supervision Need for mutual adjustment The manager has control over different activities Workers need help and counselling from the manager frequently

27 And again....


Download ppt "THE DESIGN OF THE MACROSTRUCTURE"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google