1. Surface Maintenance Engineering Planning Program
4/1/2017
Surface Maintenance Engineering Planning Program
(SURFMEPP)
SNA Update
CAPT Michael Malone
Bold Introduction
I am Captain Michael Malone, Commanding Officer, Surface Maintenance Engineering Planning Program Activity, or SURFMEPP
As you are about to see, SURFMEPP is about many things, but above all, we are about directly supporting surface ship READINESS.
(Note: Central premise of theme you are delivering is READINESS, underpinned by these recurring and repeatable supporting themes:
Quantifying Technically based and defendable REQUIREMENTS
Establishing a SUSTAINABLE, REPEATABLE, DISCIPLINED, and PREDICATIVE maintenance Planning, Execution, and Budgeting PROCESS THAT DELIVERS THE RIGHT MAINTENANCE RESOURCE AT THE RIGHT TIME AND PLACE AND AT THE RIGHT COST across the entire life cycle of a surface ship
17 Jan 2013

2. Overarching Strategic Alignment
Team Ships Strategic Plan ( )
NAVSEA SBP ( )
The SURFMEPP Strategic Plan was approved in August 2012 and is synchronized and coordinated both internally and externally to the organization. This document was the result of numerous leadership driven environmental scans and SIPOC events and thematically aligned with the NAVSEA Strategic Business Plan ( ), the Naval Sea Systems Command cornerstone strategic document. Additionally, it is strategically synchronized with the Team Ships Strategic Plan ( ).
The SURFMEPP strategic goals and focus areas support the operational maintenance requirements to 1) Sustain the current fleet efficiently and effectively; 2) Build an Affordable Future Fleet; and 3) Enable Our People. They also align our resources to the accomplishment of our goals and objectives with a singular organizational focus
The utility of this document can only be realized if it results in coordinated planning at all levels of the organization. To that end, it is focused planning by leadership at all levels of the organization and the larger NAVSEA Enterprise that brings about unity of purpose and unit cohesion.
Our Mission
We provide centralized surface ship life cycle maintenance engineering, class maintenance and modernization planning, management of maintenance strategies aligned with and responsive to National, Fleet, surface Type Commander (TYCOM) and NAVSEA needs and priorities.
Our Vision
 We are the nation’s team accountable for achieving surface ship expected service life (ESL) by:
Defending the surface ship life cycle maintenance technical requirements as the Fleet's advocate to ensure the requirements are valid and planned for execution.
Leading engineered life cycle studies that support Navy leadership risk based decisions on current and future readiness requirements.
Setting the value-added standard for surface ship life cycle engineering maintenance.
Establishing ourselves as a world-class employer of choice that inspires innovation.
Provide centralized surface ship life cycle maintenance engineering.
Class maintenance and modernization planning.
Management of maintenance strategies aligned with and responsive to National, Fleet, surface Type Commander (TYCOM) and NAVSEA needs and priorities.
SURFMEPP Strategic Plan 2

3. SURFMEPP FY 14-18 Focus Defining the Requirement
All Surface Ships though the E2E process by FY 17 - All ships complete a dry-docking by FY 18
Unknown maintenance backlog fully defined by FY 18
Engineering and Integrating the Requirement
Class Maintenance Plan requirements grow to 60% of depot package by FY 16
ABS surveys on all Surface Ships completed by FY 17.
36/9 Op Cycle fully inculcated by FY 15 – higher OPTEMP supported by smarter maintenance strategies
Modernization fully integrated with each maintenance availability
Surface Ship Engineered Operating Cycle institutionalized. Deferred lifecycle maintenance documented at ship level and visible to FLEET, OPNAV, and SYSCOM stakeholders.
Class Standard Work Templates direct greater than 50% of work package
Defending the Requirement
Deferred work and maintenance backlog process fully integrated by FY 14
Backlog documented by IGEs and “Programmatic DFS”
Policing the Process
Stable requirements process supporting TYCOM, FLEET, OPNAV in place now
SURFMEPP Dets fully staffed in all FCAs - ROTA staffing complete by FY 14
Defining the Requirement - work to eliminate undocumented service life limiting conditions (e.g., tank coating system, engine intake and uptake conditions) by fully supporting the development, scheduling, execution and proper documentation (accomplishment or deferment) of CMP Assessment Tasks.
Engineering the Requirement - strengthen the CMP, especially the directive maintenance tasks, such that the requirement is clearly stated and scheduled, with supporting technically and contractually sound CSWTs that allow for execution. *** SURFMEPP owns the CMPs and the MSP (Master Spec Catalog) and is actively working to improve them ***
Defending the Requirement - SURFMEPP is support resource sponsors at OPNAV, FLTCMDs, TYCOMs through the refinement of TFPs and Ship Sheets fully supporting the POM Budget cycle.
Policing the Process - SURFMEPP Det personnel will have a presence in all Fleet Concentration Homeports (including establishing a presence in Bahrain and Rota) and will monitor the accomplishment of required assessment and directed maintenance onboard the ships.
SURFMEPP has put in place a disciplined process to ensure that required expected service life sustaining maintenance is completed at the proper time; SURFMEPP will continue to refine our maintenance products (CMP, CSWT, TFP, Ship Sheets) to fully support the surface fleet. 3

4. Class Maintenance Plan (CMP)
Working to Achieve ESL by Defining, Documenting and Budgeting for Requirements
Class Maintenance Plan (CMP)
Technical Foundation Paper
Ship Sheets
(Ship specific LRMS)
Baseline Availability Work Package (BAWP)
Plan Long Range Requirements into Availabilities
Technical Reqts
Class Reqts ($)
Specific Ship Reqts
($, Schedule)
Plan FRP Cycle
Execute
Document & Feedback
Integrate Package
Plan Availability
Assessment Results
Ship CSMP
Modernization
Availability Work Package (AWP)
Execute Availability
C+90
Avail. Close Out
SURFMEPP’s products integrate into the overall JFFM End to End maintenance process to ensure that life cycle maintenance is programmed and tracked through the FRP and across the FYDP.
Comment: Ship Sheets are done twice to support the POM and DON process.
Increase of Ao is accomplished by:
Improving On Time Delivery of Availabilities by improved planning.
Reducing the future growth in Availabilities by tracking life cycle maintenance requirements
Reduce cost by reducing the amount of corrosion related deferred maintenance
Integrate, Execute, Document and Feedback

5. Class Maintenance Plans – Defining Life Cycle Requirements
4/1/2017
Class Maintenance Plan (CMP)
OPNAV INSTRUCTION L requires all U.S. Navy ships to have a CMP.
The CMP is comprised of 2,272 unique tasks that define off-ship maintenance and inspection requirements for the Navy’s Surface Fleet.
Preventative Maintenance
Corrective Maintenance
Material Condition Assessments
SURFMEPP maintains CMP accuracy and develops life cycle maintenance strategies for inclusion in the CMPs.
(SURFMEPP has been in existence only 2 years)
Class Maintenance Plan (CMP): The CMP contains the maintenance and assessment tasks that are required to be performed for a class of ships to meet its ESL. The CMP is updated based on technical analysis and periodic review with the associated technical authority.
SURFMEPP’s Goal is to grow CMP requirements to 60% of depot package by FY16.
As the diagram shows, our maintenance spans equipment and systems from stem-to-stern, for all surface ships, with our greatest concentrations on those equipments and systems where cost, reliability and durability are key.
The CMP is the conduit for planned maintenance – both condition-based, and time-directed.
CMP tasks are carefully developed utilizing statistical analysis of historical failure data with consideration to the task’s return-on-investment.
The entire lifespan or expected service life of a vessel underpins our approach to all class maintenance tasks: “what do we need to do, to make our ships last years?”
CMP Tasks Underpin the TFPs 5

6. Technical Foundation Paper - Life Cycle Investment Cost
4/1/2017
Technical Foundation Paper (TFP)
TFP
ESL
(Years)
Pre-TFP Baseline
Change
Revised
(MDs)
(%)
DDG 51 40
312,800
123,380
40%
437,180
LHD 1 / 8
1,340,900
502,700
37%
1,843,600
LPD 17
669,000
228,200
34%
897,200
LSD 41/49
344,350
111,550
32%
455,900
CG 47
216,200
86,700
302,900
TFP / Whitepaper (WP) Approved
DDG 51 TFP
LSD 41 / 49 TFP
LHD 1 / 8 TFP
LPD 17 TFP
CG 47 TFP
MCM TFP
LCC 19 WP
DDG 1000 WP
CG 47 (32 month FRP / 8 yr dry dock) WP
LCS 1 / 2 WP
DDG 51 ROTA Spain WP
TFP / Whitepaper in Process
PC TFP
LCS 1 TFP
Technical Foundation Paper (TFP): The TFP is a class-specific life cycle maintenance requirement that provides a class-specific Long Range Maintenance Schedule (LRMS). The TFP is developed using the CMP, historical maintenance costs, concept of operations (CONOPs), current class maintenance studies and industrial constraints. TFPs are approved by the Fleet Commanders, TYCOMs, and cognizant Technical Authority and provided to OPNAV via TYCOM and Fleet N43s.
SURFMEPP FY13 Focus:
Complete PC TFP. Requirement partially accepted for POM 15
Complete LCS 1 TFP (Sep 2013)
DDG 51: number one cost driver is A/C plants, most improved is tank assessment/preservation plan and intake/uptake preservation
LHD 1/8: tanks and preservation (especially well deck)
LPD 17: Diesel maintenance strategy and non-titanium valve replacement
LSD 41/49: Tanks, diesels and corrosion
CG 47: corrosion and structural repairs
Establishes Depot Maintenance Budgets
Summarizes Required Depot Maintenance 6

7. Documenting Deferrals during Planning is Critical
4/1/2017
Ship Sheets
Ship Sheets
Ship Sheets support POM and DoN requirements
TFP as baseline
Material condition is used to develop ship-specific requirements
Assessments are critical to document material condition
2 year old process for Surface Navy -- improved upon sub and carrier model
Deferred maintenance is tracked via BAWP/AWP and Ship Sheets
Ship Sheet: The Ship Sheet documents labor and material cost associated with each ship’s CNO availability maintenance requirements and is developed by comparing the current condition of the ship against the TFP to determine specific maintenance tasks required to “fix” the ship. These costs in turn inform the Program Objective Memorandum (POM) process and support ships meeting their ESL.
SURFMEPP FY 13 Focus:
Accomplish 495 SHIPSHEETs ISO POM 15
Update all SHIPSHEETS in support of FLT / TYCOM DON FAST
Documenting Deferrals during Planning is Critical 7

8. SURFMEPP-TYCOM BAWP/AWP Fielding Plan
Baseline Availability Work Package (BAWP)
CLASS
CY 2012
CY 2013
CY 2014
DDG 59 14 7 4 2 61 62 21 CG 22 12
LSD
LHD 8 7
LPD 8 5
MCM 14 14
LCS 3 2 PC 13 7
TOTAL
90 as of 31 Dec 2012
129 as of 31 Dec 2013
142 as of 31 Dec 2014
BAWP Production as of 01/11/ Total Ships
All classes with a TFP will be in the E2E Process by CY 2014
BAWPs Delivered
AWPs Turned Over to TYCOMS
Ships in Availability Execution
Ships Completed First
Pass E2E Process 91
(40 LANT / 37 PAC / 14 FDNF) 68 11
(7 LANT / 3 PAC / 1 FDNF) 17

9. SURFMEPP Products Support More Effective Assessments
4/1/2017
DDG 51 Class Gas Turbine Intakes and Uptakes Inspection Handbook
Distribution began 1 November 2012
Implemented two-dimensional diagrams with compartment numbers and space access locations.
Added three-dimensional diagrams, “You are here”
Included DDG 51 Class Advisory for exhaust fasteners
Inserted descriptors in diagrams “Areas to check for” and “You are here”
The SURFMEPP DDG 51 Class Gas Turbine Intakes and Uptakes Inspection Handbook is in circulation on the waterfront and garnering very positive feedback from our fleet customers. The Handbook will be presented in the Commander, Naval Surface Force Atlantic (CNSL)/Commander Naval Surface Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet (CNSP) Maintenance University (MU) master brief and a digital version will be included on the reference disc issued to all MU attendees.
We have supplied approximately 200 pocket-friendly hard copies as well as 20 electronic copies to multiple organizations in the maintenance community including BAE, Bath Iron Works, CNSL/CNSP N43s, NSSA, NSWC Carderock, RMCs, DDG Project Engineers and various Naval Shipyards.
Individuals can download an electronic version of the handbook and participate in the technical inquiry discussion board located on the SURFMEPP iNAVSEA site.
Handbook distributed to ship COs, CNRMC, RMC (ADs/PMs), TYCOM N43s, PEs, MGTIs & SURFMEPP Dets 9

10. All surface ships in the E2E Process by end of FY14
Summary
SURFMEPP is documenting and defending better budgets ISO life cycle requirements.
We don’t “own” the requirement - we manage it ISO TWHs
Requirements underpinned by technical rigor
Ship Sheets track the requirements across the budget cycle
SURFMEPP integrates stakeholder functions in support of the DISCIPLINED and RIGOROUS E2E surface maintenance process.
Measurable, Repeatable, Sustainable
SURFMEPP is helping to change the surface maintenance culture on the waterfront one ship at a time!
SURFMEPP goal is to get the maintenance requirements right - “constitutional responsibility to maintain our ships throughout their service life”
E2E process is disciplined and rigorous process integrating stakeholders
SURFMEPP is working to change maintenance culture from being tactically based to strategically based
All surface ships in the E2E Process by end of FY14 10

11. Contact Us CAPT Michael Malone (Commanding Officer)
/ Phone:
Mr. Tom Gallagher (Deputy)
/ Phone:
Mr. Tim Bergan (Mission Support)
/ Phone:
Mr. John Murphy (Engineering / TFPs / CMPs / Cost Engineering)
/ Phone:
Mr. Mike Tobin (Maint & Avail Planning / Integration / BAWPs / Corrosion)
/ Phone:
Mr. Mark Leary (Detachments)
/ Phone:
My leadership team and I stand ready to assist you in any way as you navigate through the E2E process. 11

12. Backup
Questions? 12

13. SURFMEPP Footprint SURFMEPP Headquarters Portsmouth, VA
SAN DIEGO
Detachment
(13 total)
NORFOLK Detachment
(11 total)
JRMC Detachment
(5 total)
3 Yoko. 2 Sasebo
MAYPORT Detachment
(3 total)
PEARL HARBOR
(4 total)
PACNORWEST
(1 total)
DET Dept HD
San Diego
Talk to role of Detachments in supporting the waterfront.
Communicate the technical requirement
Plan and host Life Cycle Planning Conference, and Mid-Cycle Review to ensure MT understands the technical requirements for the current cycle
Review all technical requirements with MT prior to entering in CSMP shore file
Track the status of Class Maintenance Plan mandatory tasks
Work with the MT & RMC to resolve issues
Validate the technical requirement
Ensure all current technical requirements are on CSMP shore file
Verify repairs are tied to originating assessment
Identify gaps in CMP (missing or unnecessary requirement)
Perform SHIP verification visits to validate the accuracy of the scope of documented repair requests
Meet with key SHIP personnel to review LCC requirements.
Represent SURFMEPP HQ at the waterfront
Provide SURFMEPP perspective
Attend SHIP meetings
PB4M
Assessment Event Briefs
Production Meetings
Progress Meetings/Conferences
RMC Execution Briefs
Be the advocate for the waterfront community
Provide a voice back to the technical requirement owners
Ensure the process can be executed (barrier ID and removal assistance)
Participate in Knowledge Sharing Networks
BAHRAIN Detachment
(2 pending)
ROTA Detachment
(2 pending)
ESL Advocacy in EVERY Fleet Concentration Area 13

14. Long Range Maintenance Schedule by Hull is Key Difference
Evolution of SURFMEPP
Long Range Maintenance Schedule by Hull is Key Difference
2008 Pre – SSLCM
SURFMEPP – Nov 2010
NSLC-managed ICMP with 14 people for entire surface .....Navy
No Technical Foundation Papers (TFPs)
No Baseline Availability Work Packages (BAWPs)
Ship Sheets at the Class level
Approx 83 total staff Nov 2010
Class Maintenance Plans
TFPs (All ships except FFG)
BAWP
Deferral Tracking by hull
Ship Sheets
Long Range Maintenance Schedules by hull
Corrosion Control (ABS, CCIMS, TPRs)
Integrated maintenance package
Approx 240 full end strength by end of FY13
SSLCM – May 2009
Approx 36 total staff May 2009
Class Maintenance Plan
Technical Foundation Paper (DDG only)
BAWP
Deferral Tracking
Ship Sheets based on Deferrals
In the Fall of 2008, in response to a growing concern that the material condition of surface ships may not provide sufficient margins to ensure each ship would meet its expected service life, Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) recommended the establishment of a dedicated activity to provide centralized life-cycle management and support for U.S. Navy surface ships. The Surface Warfare Enterprise approved that recommendation and the Navy formally stood up the Surface Ship Life Cycle Management (SSLCM) Activity in May 2009 under the Deputy Commander for Surface Warfare (SEA 21).
Partnering with both Fleets and Type Commanders (TYCOM), the SSLCM Activity was chartered to assess and manage the maintenance requirements throughout the life cycle of ships in the surface fleet, in order to better plan and budget for long-term maintenance needs. The SSLCM Activity was modeled after, and was designed to function similarly to, the Submarine Maintenance Engineering Planning and Procurement (SUBMEPP) Activity and the Carrier Planning Activity (CPA).
SSLCM aimed to maximize the material readiness of the current fleet by maintaining, monitoring, and refining Integrated Class Maintenance Plans (ICMPs), developing life cycle support to address system upgrades, streamlining existing communication and maintenance strategies, and fully implementing the ICMPs into each surface ship's maintenance schedule and availability planning process.
In November 2010, SSLCM expanded from a Category 2 Detachment into an Echelon 3 Shore Activity, with a Commanding Officer, and became known as the Surface Maintenance Engineering Planning Program (SURFMEPP).
Current End Strength: 213
1 Mil / 118 Civper / 94 KTRS
SSLCM
SURFMEPP 36 79
153
197
240
Steady State
Approved Staffing Plan – POM 13 14

15. Alignment to NAVSEA TOC Goals
Understanding the Constants…Engineering the Requirements
Class Maintenance Plans (CMPs)
Technically validated documentation of detailed maintenance requirements for each ship class
Continuously updated
and “streamlined”
based on maintenance
History
Technical Foundation Paper (TFP)
Class-specific document provides a foundation for all class maintenance requirements
Requirements across
the life cycle
Baseline is well-built and
maintained ship
SURFMEPP’s goal is to ensure that appropriate maintenance is preformed which allows Ships’ to meet their expected service life.
Technical Foundation Papers (TFP) align the resource requirement for In-Service Maintenance over the expected service life of the ships in a class. SURFMEPP continuously works to validate and strengthen the Engineered Requirements within a Class Maintenance Plan (CMP), which are the foundation of the TFP. These documents ensure that platform sustaining maintenance is preformed and resourced.
Rigorous and near continuous CMP Strengthening efforts serves as the basis for SURFMEPP’s control of Total Ownership Costs. By reviewing and strengthening the base requirements, SURFMEPP better ensures platforms reach service life without expensive emergent repairs.
Operational Requirement
Modernization Strategy
Contracting Strategy

16. Looking to the Future … ZUMWALT Class Guided Missile Destroyer
Closing comments: SURFMEPP, through SEA 21, is engaged with Ship Construction Program Offices working to get ahead of maintenance planning and resourcing issues brought on by new classes of ship being introduced into the fleet.
Future of Surface Navy 16

17. Tracking and Measuring Results of each Ship across the FRP Cycle
Surface Maintenance, Modernization, and Sustainment End-to-End Process Map
Tracking and Measuring Results of each Ship across the FRP Cycle
…from Start…
…to Finish…
E2E Process:
Codified in JFMM
Disciplined/ Enforced by Stakeholders
Traceable Accountability
Continuous Process Improvement
Informed by Metrics
…and Back Again…
Measurements & Metrics at each Milestone
Integrated Risk Assessments to Decision Makers*
Definitized Work Packages
Reduced Risk to Quality, Sked, Cost
E2E Process Map Adherence only successful with joint enforcement from
TYCOM, NAVSEA21, SURFMEPP and CNRMC.
*Timely Risk Management

18. Detachment Functions
Communicate the technical requirement
Plan and host Life Cycle Planning Conference, and Mid-Cycle Review to ensure MT understands the technical requirements for the current cycle
Review all technical requirements with MT prior to entering in CSMP shore file
Track the status of Class Maintenance Plan mandatory tasks
Work with the MT & RMC to resolve issues
Validate the technical requirement
Ensure all current technical requirements are on CSMP shore file
Verify repairs are tied to originating assessment
Identify gaps in CMP (missing or unnecessary requirement)
Perform SHIP verification visits to validate the accuracy of the scope of documented repair requests
Meet with key SHIP personnel to review LCC requirements
Represent SURFMEPP HQ at the waterfront
Provide SURFMEPP perspective
Attend SHIP meetings
PB4M
Assessment Event Briefs
Production Meetings
Progress Meetings/Conferences
RMC Execution Briefs
Be the advocate for the waterfront community
Provide a voice back to the technical requirement owners
Ensure the process can be executed (barrier ID and removal assistance)
Participate in Knowledge Sharing Networks
STRESS these are the SURFMEPP personnel you should see at your PB4Ms, CNO avail advance planning meetings, key CNO avail execution meetings.
As the SURFMEPP representative at the waterfront, the detachments work directly with port engineers, ship superintendents, Regional Maintenance Center ICMP managers and other maintenance team members to coordinate all facets of the BAWP / AWP milestone schedule.
At the beginning of a maintenance cycle, the det works with the BAWP managers and platform engineers to ensure that the pre-push file (the listing of tasks proposed for the BAWP) is as accurate as possible, and then the det member takes the pre-push file to the maintenance team to review.
The det member hosts the LCPC and drives the agenda. The LCPC gives the port engineer, ship superintendent, combat systems port engineer, Ship’s CO and other maintenance team members another opportunity to raise issues or concerns with the tasks proposed for the BAWP in the pre-push file. The conference also covers outstanding Departures From Specification and existing Class Advisories that may need to be addressed during the maintenance cycle. Modernization items (if known) are discussed, and a review of upcoming milestones is held.
Throughout the cycle, the det member works closely with the port engineer and other maintenance team members to ensure that BAWP tasks are being screened to appropriate availabilities and accomplished as scheduled. Det members also interact frequently with the Type Desk Assistants and Type Desk Officers, to ensure that the Type Desk is informed of the status of mandatory items. The det also reviews the shore file CSMP weekly, looking for Repair 2Ks written as a result of BAWP assessment tasks, and also looking for lifecycle critical items which should be added to the BAWP. If a repair item is generated that may be a costly lifecycle repair, the det member can be SURFMEPP’s trusted agent to get a first-hand look at the situation, even take photos if needed, and report the information back to the Platform Managers and others.
The detachment continues to track the progress of all BAWP tasks and ensures that all “A” branded items are either completed or properly deferred. This information is used at the BAWP Close-Out Verification and Assessment meeting, which is also arranged and chaired by the detachment.
The detachment members attend Planning Board For Maintenance, Availability Advanced Planning meetings, Work Package Integration Conferences, Work Package Execution Reviews and Integrated Product Team Development meetings. At all of these meetings, they are on hand to report the status of BAWP execution to the other attendees, as well as to learn about other actions which may impact the BAWP or Lifecycle Maintenance.
Because they are located near the maintenance teams and know the nuances of how maintenance gets done in their location, the “det” members can help to remove roadblocks to ensure that all mandatory tasks are being accomplished or properly deferred with technical adjudication.
Detachment manages the REQUIREMENTS throughout the entire CYCLE! 18

19. Ship Maintenance Process
4/1/2017
Ship Maintenance Process 19

20. 4/1/2017
SURFMEPP Progress
Products
SSLCMA
FY11 Results
FY12 Results
FY13 Focus
Engineering studies / Technical Foundation Paper
• Completed LSD 41/49, CG47, LHD 1 TFPs
• Completed LPD 17 TFP
• Completed Long Range Maintenance Schedules (LRMS) ISO DDG, CG, LSD & LHD individual ships
• Completed MCM TFP. Requirement accepted for POM 14
• Completed DDG Rev A TFP. Incorporated EDSRA Lessons Learned. Requirement accepted for POM 15
• Completed LCS White Paper
• Complete PC TFP. Requirement partially accepted for POM 15
• Complete LCS 1 TFP (Sep 2013)
Budgeting /PRE-PRL/SHIPSHEETS
• DDG 51 and LSD 41/49 SHIPSHEETs based on TFP
• Supported TYCOM with all SHIPSHEETs for FY12 & FY13 availabilities. (Unfunded Technical Requirements (UTR) and high value targets incorporated)
• LSD 41/49, CG 47, LHD1 TFPs completed
• Developed 468 SHIPSHEETs and accomplished 32 revisions ISO POM 14
• Supported FLT / TYCOM DON FAST
• Accomplish 495 SHIPSHEETs ISO POM 15
• Update all SHIPSHEETS in support of FLT / TYCOM DON FAST
BAWP
• 28 of 28 DDGs with FY12 CNO avails in progress
• BAWP: business rules established and implemented by FFC/CPF
• Completed 52 ship BAWPs for DDGs, LSDs, CGs, and LHDs
• Delivered 27 ship BAWPs to TYCOM ISO AWP development
• Rev A to Execution of Business Rules for FY12 availabilities implemented and JFMM changes submitted
• Issued 85 BAWPs
• Turned over 40 BAWPs to TYCOM for AWP development
• Completed JFMM updates
• 3 ships completed full E2E maintenance process
• Complete ~130 BAWPs (all ships to have BAWPs by end of FY14)
• ~35 ships will complete the full E2E maintenance process
Corrosion Control / ABS
• SURFMEPP leadership for management of all Surface Ship corrosion initiatives.
• Integration of ABS results in requirements definition and budgeting process
• LANT 75% known conditions, PAC 7% known conditions
• FY11-16 plan ISO assessing 148 surface ships
• ABS alignment
• Significant improvements in known tank conditions
• LANT 86% known conditions, PAC 64% known conditions
• Completed 22 ship ABS surveys
• Known tank condition improved to 87% LANT and 74% PAC
• 16 ships to complete ABS surveys
• Targeting 85% known tank condition fleet wide
CMP Strengthening
• AVCERT cost drivers tackled: HHD, RAST, Flight Deck
• Completed DDG Intake / Uptakes assessment guide
• Targeting DDG / CG / LPD critical corrosion areas
• C/S Improvements: directors, antennas
• Targeting amphib well deck critical corrosion area
The goal of the briefing would be to draw attention to current FY12 results and FY13 focus – Forward thinking 20

21. SURFMEPP FY14-18 Focus Defining the Requirement:
All Surface Ships though the E2E process by FY17 - All ships complete a dry-docking by FY18
Unknown maintenance backlog fully defined by FY18
Engineering and Integrating the Requirement:
Class Maintenance Plan requirements grow to 60% of depot package by FY16
ABS surveys on all Surface Ships completed by FY17.
36/9 Op Cycle fully inculcated by FY15 – higher OPTEMP supported by smarter maintenance strategies
Modernization fully integrated with each maintenance availability
Surface Ship Engineered Operating Cycle institutionalized. Deferred life cycle maintenance documented at ship level and visible to FLEET, OPNAV, and SYSCOM stakeholders.
Class Standard Work Templates direct greater than 50% of work package
Defending the Requirement:
Deferred work and maintenance backlog process fully integrated by FY14
Backlog documented by IGEs and “Programmatic DFS”
Policing the Process:
Stable requirements process supporting TYCOM, FLEET, OPNAV in place now
SURFMEPP Dets fully staffed in all FCAs - ROTA staffing complete by FY14

22. SSEOC IS BASIS TO MAKE ESL INFORMED DECISIONS
4/1/2017
Surface Ship Engineered Operating Cycle (SSEOC) Systems Technical Basis for ESL Decisions
100
STRUCTURE
200
PROPULSION
300
ELECTRICAL
400
COMM & SURV
500
AUX
600
OUTFIT & FURNISHING
U/W Hull
Superstructure/Mast
Bilges
Stacks
Sonar Dome
Tanks/Voids
Decks Steel
Bulkheads/
Structure
Steam Turbines
MPDE’s
Boilers
MRGs
Struts
Intakes/Uptakes
Shafting
Piping Fuel, Main and Aux steam
Switchboards
Cabling Distribution
SPY Array
Ventilation
Rudders
Steering
Firemain, Piping
CMWDS
Aux SW
CHT
ICCP System
Corrosion General
Hull/Insulation
Non Sweat Paint
U/W Hull Paint Systems
All ship board systems have CMP tasks; SSEOC designated systems have a greater impact on the platform achieving ESL
Identified In TFP, Placed In BAWP, Tracked Through Avail
Aperture For CMP Strengthening, Maintenance Deferrals, Availability Shifts/Cancellations
SSEOC IS BASIS TO MAKE ESL INFORMED DECISIONS

23. SURFMEPP and ABS Collaboration on Assessments
Baseline Material Condition
Utilizing ABS commercial experience & analysis software
Focus is Hull Structure:
Hull, Scantlings, Deckhouse, Tanks
Finite element models developed, and used to identify areas of increased risk
Risk assessment enables targeted maintenance activity
FY13 Surveys
USS PRINCETON (CG-59)
USS NORMANDY (CG-60)
USS MITSCHER (DDG-57)
USS LABOON (DDG-58)
USS RUSSELL (DDG-59)
USS MILIUS (DDG-69)
USS ROSS (DDG-71)
USS PORTER (DDG-78)
USS CHAFEE (DDG-90)
USS WASP (LHD-1)
USS IWO JIMA (LHD-7)
USS GREEN BAY (LPD-20)
USS FORT MCHENRY (LSD-43)
USS RUSHMORE (LSD-47)
USS BUNKER HILL (CG-52)
USS COLE (DDG-67)
ABS surveys on all Surface Ships completed by FY 17!
The purpose of the American Bureau of Shipping (ABS) effort is to improve ship condition information, and ultimately repair package quality, by leveraging an independent third party survey process, using proven commercial standards.
Background: ABS is a 140 year old maritime industry classification society that verifies an oceangoing vessels compliance with technical requirements.
The Achieving Service Life Program is a cooperative agreement established in 2008 between ABS and NAVSEA. The program covers roughly ships per year, focusing on those ships with dry-docking availabilities.
SURFMEPP Goal is to complete ABS surveys on all Surface Ships by FY 17. W 23