1. Teaching digitally tethered students . . . differently?
Expanding your reach
Teaching digitally
tethered students
differently?
Maggi Savin-Baden,
Coventry University

2. Introduction
Debate in higher education and across the media about the impact of digital media on learning. Unclear as to whether (too much) digital influence is resulting in imbalances in learning and engagement.

3. We are digitally tethered

4. The constant interaction and engagement with digital technology . . .
Digital tethering
The constant interaction and engagement with digital technology . . .
. . . the sense of being ‘always on’ ‘always engaged’; characterised by wearing a mobile device, texting at dinner, driving illegally while ‘facebooking’.

5. How we might see it . . .
Portal to
re-view
the issues

6. Argument We are digitally tethered
Digital tethering is resulting in different kinds of networked societies and education systems
We are encountering new genres of learning and participation The presentation will argue for the need to:
do things differently
design for and across disciplinary boundaries.
reconsider how learning spaces should-might be constituted

7. Issues to consider Unhelpful pedagogy vs technology debate
Liquid learning

8. Unhelpful pedagogy vs technology debate
State of play is still one of ‘just implementing’ technology with little design for learning or theoretical basis. However The use of technology is already a culturally embedded practice: digital practices and uses are evolving For example, the democratization of media production is resulting in young people not only being central to the digital age, but key players in its formulation and (re)creation.

9. Liquid Learning
Liquid learning is characterised by emancipation, reflexivity and flexibility’ (Savin-Baden, 2008), adapting to an ever- changing ‘liquid modern’ (Bauman, 2000).
Universities need to stretch beyond open courseware and closed virtual environments.
Learning needs to be created around a constellation of uncertainties, such as negotiated assessment, mobile, open and flexible learning intentions.

10. Interesting research Virtual worlds in higher education
Problem-based simulations
Chat bots

12. Dilemmas over pedagogical use of Second Life
Some of the deep educational problems are: 1. Understanding of ways of creating effective learning situations in immersive virtual worlds such as Second Life 2. Failure to understand which types of scenarios work in which disciplines and which contexts, and why this is the case 3. The poverty of technology-enabled learning projects that are contextually-based 4. The paucity of linking educational models and theories across contexts and disciplines.

13. Effective activities for virtual world learning
Some things that seem to work particularly well are:
Tours of Second Life
7 minute streamed lectures
Well designed problem-based learning scenarios in a small group (4 students)
Building group with 6 students
Individual quests followed by group discussion
Student-led performances and shows, such as short plays, scenes or fashion shows.

14. Chatbots
Chatbots – virtual characters that can have a natural language conversation with a human 14 14

15. Past Research Realism of the chatbot (e.g. Turing 1950)
Anthropomorphic (Baylor 2011)
Seven themes affecting realistic interaction (Morrisey & Kirakowski 2013)
Computer synthesized voices (Clark & Mayer 2008)
Split-attention effect (Garau et. al. 2003, Demeure et. al. 2011)
Most research has focused on the realism of the pedagogic agent e.g. Turing Test (1950).
Anthropormorphic - human like avatar prefered rather than cartoon like
Seven themes affect perceptions of realistic chatbot-human interactions:
Maintenance of themed discussions
Responding to specific questions
Responding to social queues
Using appropriate linguistic register
Greetings and personality
Giving conversational cues and
inappropriate utterances and damage control
Computer synthesized voices not prefered or well liked by users
Split attention
(first ref) – split attention i.e. increases cognitive load due to increased demand for attention, distracting from the task at hand. E.g. voice not synced properly with lip movements, facial features not moving realistically or drawing the focus of attention away from the main message /dialogue.
(Second ref) – potential for reduced believability and trustworthiness and again potentially reducing the learning potential.

16. Chatbots
Chatbots – virtual characters that can have a natural language conversation with a human 16 16

17. Findings
The findings of this study suggest that 3 key issues are important:
The appearance of the agent
The issue of choice of bot
Disclosure.

18. Expanding our reach
The ways in which we operate in/on the internet do seem largely to mirror current society, but things are just shared (faster) on a bigger and wider stage than they used to be. Learning is also on the move; lives are liquid. Implicit in all this tethering is that its impact on learning in higher education remains under- researched. The views of teachers and students about the value of digital technology still differ markedly in many schools and universities.

19. What we need to do more of . . .
Design learning that is negotiated, constructed and embodied as a social practice
Stop seeing the curriculum as a predictable, ordered and manageable space

20. Summary and reflections
We need to see the curriculum as an important site of transformation characterised by risk and uncertainty.
HE is on the move, and virtual learning and digital tethering are practices we need to take with us into an unknown future whilst recognising that living at the interstices of learning and technology are important places to stand.

21. Who has a question?