Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
IMCOM Sustainment Directorate
Mr. Karim Manji Energy Update
2
Who Are We?
3
Subordinate Garrisons
IMCOM IMCOM Sustainment AMC SC Installations - Adelphi - APG - Detroit - Natick - Picatinny* - Redstone - Rock Island - Anniston AD** - Bluegrass AD** - Letterkenny AD** - McAlester AAP** - Pine Bluff Arsenal** - Pueblo CD** - Red River AD** - Sierra AD** - Tobyhanna AD** - Tooele AD** - Watervliet** MDW SC Installations - Ft. AP Hill - Ft. Belvoir - Ft. Meade - JB Myer-Henderson Hall MEDCOM SC Installations - Ft. Detrick ARNORTH SC Installations - ASA Ft. Sam Houston SOUTHCOM SC Installations - Miami - Soto Cano ATEC SC Installations - Dugway - Yuma 17 Direct Report Installations + 11 AMC Special Installations (MWR only) * SC is subordinate to ASA(ALT) ** AMC Installation – ID-S over MWR only
4
IMCOM Sustainment Task Organized Organizational Structure XO Director
CSM Deputy COS SJA EA IST HR PW Ops/Plans RM MWR Installations: APG - Meade Adelphi - Natick AP Hill - Picatinny Belvoir - Redstone Detroit - Rock Island Detrick - Sam Houston Dugway PG - Yuma PG JB Myer HH - Soto Cano AB As of 20 Feb 2019
5
Energy/Water FY 19 Energy OPORD: IMCOM HQ G4 is working (ET: March with data due April). Main change from last year: Inventory all facility emergency back-up power generators. FY 20 Projects Submission: EWCR – emphasize resiliency component of project Projects with payback < 10 years are now being considered viable Highly recommend building retuning/recommissioning projects. High payback demonstrated at RSA. IEWPs: FY19: Belvoir/Detrick/Meade/Redstone (kicked-off). Miami upcoming. FY20: APG (will roll-up Adelphi with APG) FY21: Adelphi / AP Hill /Detroit / Dugway /JBMHH / Natick / Picatinny / RIA / Natick ID S Initiatives: REM Acquisition ESPC/UESC Buydowns, Metering IDS goal at 85% Goal vs 65% for IMCOM Building Automation Systems (BAS) Demand Reduction (DR) Mock Billing (for reimbursable customers – aid in paradigm shift to conserve) Energy Policy
6
Energy/Utilities Approach
1 – Situation Under a10% Cost Redux Mandate for Energy/Utilities Installations have briefed Achievable Reductions 3 – Sustainability Initiatives Building Automation Systems Metering (Success Story: Meade – mock billing for nonreimbursible Army Customers) Energy Policies from top-down (assist in paradigm shift) Demand Redux Participation Continuous Commissioning (success story: RSA) 2 – Resilience/Security Initiatives APG (Edgewood Site) CHP – 7.9 MW (~50% redux in consumption) Detroit Arsenal – programming CHP 4MW Taking a holistic approach with Installation Energy/Water Plan (IEWP). Building resiliency/security/conservation requirements into the IEWP Following AMC approach on Resilience (load level up to transmission) 4 – Challenges / Resources Needed Funding for initiatives (pursuing ESPCs/UESCs/EWCR/QUTM) Resources (TDA cut-backs) Need organization behavioral changes; with tangible enforcements Need variance to allow charge-backs for above common level of services for Army Customers Funding for Resource Efficiency Managers (REMs) Requirement for additional upgrades to BAS; ability to off set costly demand surges; Army metering system not linked to BAS Need organization behavioral changes; with tangible enforcement
7
IDS Energy/Utilities Success Stories
APG Edgewood Area CHP
8
Energy/Utilities Success Stories
Redstone Arsenal Bldg. Resilience and Renewable
9
Energy/Utilities Success Stories
Redstone Arsenal Bldg. Retuning (Bldg. 4400) (Validated EUI savings)
10
Questions?
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.