1. Regional Variation in Stroke Rehabilitation Outcomes
Timothy A. Reistetter, PhD, OTR, Amol M. Karmarkar, PhD, OTR, James E. Graham, PhD, DC, Karl Eschbach, PhD, Yong-Fang Kuo, PhD, Carl V. Granger, MD, Jean Freeman, PhD, Kenneth J. Ottenbacher, PhD, OTR 
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 
Volume 95, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
DOI: /j.apmr
Copyright © 2014 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions

2. Fig 1
Conceptual model for variation in stroke rehabilitation dependent on 3 components: demographic factors, clinical factors, and geographic region.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , 29-38DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2014 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions

3. Fig 2
Regional differences in LOS after adjusting for demographic and clinical factors across CMS regions. National median was 16.6 days (CMS 10). Lighter areas reflect shorter LOS. LOS varied by 2 days across the CMS regions.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , 29-38DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2014 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions

4. Fig 3
Percentage of individuals discharged to the community after stroke rehabilitation after adjusting for demographic and clinical factors. Community discharge varied by 20% across the CMS regions.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , 29-38DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2014 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions