Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Figure 1 The process of bone defect creation, implant insertion and ridge augmentation. (a) Creation of standardized ... Figure 1 The process of bone defect.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Figure 1 The process of bone defect creation, implant insertion and ridge augmentation. (a) Creation of standardized ... Figure 1 The process of bone defect."— Presentation transcript:

1 Figure 1 The process of bone defect creation, implant insertion and ridge augmentation. (a) Creation of standardized ... Figure 1 The process of bone defect creation, implant insertion and ridge augmentation. (a) Creation of standardized acute dehiscence-type defect. (b) Implant insertion and exposed implant surface was treated with bone substitute grafting materials. (c) All defects were covered with Bio-Gide collagen membrane. (d) The flap was carefully closed by the mucoperiosteal flaps for submerged healing Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Regen Biomater, Volume 6, Issue 2, 21 March 2019, Pages 107–111, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

2 Figure 2 The alveolar ridge height of four tested groups after 3 and 6 months of healing. There was no significant ... Figure 2 The alveolar ridge height of four tested groups after 3 and 6 months of healing. There was no significant difference among the test and control groups in either test period Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Regen Biomater, Volume 6, Issue 2, 21 March 2019, Pages 107–111, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

3 Figure 3 Bone volume density of four tested groups after 3 and 6 months of healing. The three types of materials used ... Figure 3 Bone volume density of four tested groups after 3 and 6 months of healing. The three types of materials used in the present study displayed similar bone volume density Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Regen Biomater, Volume 6, Issue 2, 21 March 2019, Pages 107–111, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

4 Figure 4 Bone complexity of four tested groups after 3 and 6 months of healing. The three types of materials used in ... Figure 4 Bone complexity of four tested groups after 3 and 6 months of healing. The three types of materials used in the present study displayed similar bone complexity Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Regen Biomater, Volume 6, Issue 2, 21 March 2019, Pages 107–111, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

5 Figure 5 The histological results for the defect area after 6 months of healing. Similar histological results were ... Figure 5 The histological results for the defect area after 6 months of healing. Similar histological results were observed for all of the groups in terms of bone regeneration and osseointegration. TA: the material was a mixture of HA and collagen. TB: the material is biomimetic mineralized collagen; BO : Bio-Oss bone-grafting material; BC: the blank control group contained only bone defects with a collagen membrane Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Regen Biomater, Volume 6, Issue 2, 21 March 2019, Pages 107–111, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.


Download ppt "Figure 1 The process of bone defect creation, implant insertion and ridge augmentation. (a) Creation of standardized ... Figure 1 The process of bone defect."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google