1. Process and local learning
SAF 2015
Process and local learning
Jackie Collins

2. SAF Process 2015
No local data collection
Detailed national data will be developed by PHE from GP and HSCIC data, available early 2016
Data will include anonymised CCG level information
Areas expected to have locality improvement planning meeting by end February
Expert task and finish group will agree a format for future SAF from 2016
New framework to be launched April 2016

3. Background to peer review/local learning
Not much evidence of rigorous peer review in South region for 2014 SAF
Peer review across London would support the region to identify areas for improvement, enable local learning and sharing of good practice

4. Peer reviews
Inclusion North commissioned to carry out peer reviews in 2013 and 2014
Moderation and feedback exercise (not validation)
Inclusion North carried out pre-peer review of all SAF’s and gave feedback
Workshop held where each group looked at another return (Year 1 anonymised)
Aim to identify good practice, agree what’s acceptable RAG evidence and what is just routine

5. Workshop
Workshop held approx 10 days before submission
Not successful in making workshop an inclusive event with service users and family carers
Some regions brought co-chairs of LDPB to workshop
Honesty that didn’t have capacity to make SAF accessible (query if that is possible anyway)

6. Workshop (2)
Outcome of workshop:
Identify ‘striking’ or surprising results
Reflection/peer improvement and support
Key messages to take back to each area
Opportunity for areas to give feedback on SAF itself
Regional actions agreed

7. Cost of peer review
Facilitation costs for Inclusion North - £6000
Venue costs?
Expenses for attendance/participation by service users and family carers?