Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Percutaneous intervention for carotid in-stent restenosis does not improve outcomes compared with nonoperative management  Jayer Chung, MD, MSc, Wilmer.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Percutaneous intervention for carotid in-stent restenosis does not improve outcomes compared with nonoperative management  Jayer Chung, MD, MSc, Wilmer."— Presentation transcript:

1 Percutaneous intervention for carotid in-stent restenosis does not improve outcomes compared with nonoperative management  Jayer Chung, MD, MSc, Wilmer Valentine, MD, Sherene E. Sharath, MPH, Amita Pathak, BS, Neal R. Barshes, MD, MPH, George Pisimisis, MD, Panagiotis Kougias, MD, Joseph L. Mills, MD  Journal of Vascular Surgery  Volume 64, Issue 5, Pages e1 (November 2016) DOI: /j.jvs Copyright © Terms and Conditions

2 Fig Kaplan-Meier survival analysis comparing the subjects presenting with carotid in-stent restenosis (C-ISR) treated with percutaneous vs nonoperative management. MI, Myocardial infarction; SE, standard error. Journal of Vascular Surgery  , e1DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © Terms and Conditions


Download ppt "Percutaneous intervention for carotid in-stent restenosis does not improve outcomes compared with nonoperative management  Jayer Chung, MD, MSc, Wilmer."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google