Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Speaker : Lee Heon-Jong
Integrated Coverage and Connectivity Configuration in Wireless Sensor Networks Xiaorui Wang, Guoliang Xing, Yuanfang Zhang, Chenyang Lu, Robert Pless, Christopher Gill Speaker : Lee Heon-Jong Advanced Ubiquitous Computing
2
Contents Introduction Coverage and connectivity Experimentation
Relationship between connectivity and coverage Coverage and connectivity configuration Rc >= 2Rs Rc < 2Rs Experimentation Coverage configuration Coverage and communication performance System Life time Conclusion Advanced Ubiquitous Computing
3
Introduction Sensor network constraint : Energy Power saving mode
Active and sleep scheduling General goal Minimize the number of active nodes Guarantee QoS Sensing coverage, network connectivity Advanced Ubiquitous Computing
4
Introduction Sensing coverage Connectivity Monitoring quality
Different degree required by application Coverage requirement change Related with the number of faults to be tolerated Connectivity Minimum number of node to be removed to partition the graph into more than one connected component larger number greater connectivity Redundant potential connectivity for fault tolerance Greater connectivity for communication bottleneck Advanced Ubiquitous Computing
5
Introduction Past’s approach New idea of this paper
Separate approaches for each Provided a fixed degree of coverage New idea of this paper Analytic guarantee for Sensing coverage with effective connectivity Dynamically configured degree of coverage Advanced Ubiquitous Computing
6
Problems Terminology Formulation of problem Rs, C(v), Rc
Convex region A of a coverage degree of K every location inside A is covered by at least K nodes Formulation of problem Given a coverage region A, and sensor coverage degree Ks Maximizing the number of nodes that are scheduled to sleep Under constraints A is at least Ks-covered All active nodes are connected p v Rs q |pv| Advanced Ubiquitous Computing
7
Relationship between coverage and connectivity
Depends on the ratio of the communication range to the sensing range Not guarantee each other Coverage : whether any location is uncovered Connectivity : all location of active nodes are connected But can be handled by a configuration protocol if Rc (Communication range) >= 2Rs (sensing range) Advanced Ubiquitous Computing
8
Relationship between coverage and connectivity
Sufficient condition for 1-coverage to imply connectivity (Theorem 1) A region is sensor covered(at least 1-covered), the sensors covering region are connected if Rc >= 2Rs Sufficient condition for 1 covered network to guarantee one-connectivity Advanced Ubiquitous Computing
9
Relationship between coverage and connectivity
Relationship between the degree of coverage and connectivity Boundary connectivity is Ks (Lemma 1) for a Ks-covered convex region A, it is possible to disconnect a boundary node from the rest of the nodes in the communication graph by removing Ks sensors if Rc >= 2Rs Advanced Ubiquitous Computing
10
Relationship between coverage and connectivity
Relationship between the degree of coverage and connectivity (cont’d) Tight lower bound on connectivity of communication graph is Ks (Theorem 2) A set of nodes that Ks-cover a convex region A forms a Ks connected communication graph if Rc >= 2Rs A disconnected network Advanced Ubiquitous Computing
11
Relationship between coverage and connectivity
Relationship between the degree of coverage and connectivity (cont’d) Tight lower bound of Interior connectivity is 2Ks (Theorem 3) For a set of sensors that Ks-cover a convex region A, the interior connectivity is 2Ks if Rc >= 2Rs Two cases of disconnected situation of interior communication First case : the void does not merge with boundary prove one must remove at least 2Ks+1 sensors
12
Relationship between coverage and connectivity
Conclusion Boundary connectivity (for nodes located within Rs distance to the boundary of the coverage region) Ks the interior connectivity 2Ks Second case : the void merge with boundary Advanced Ubiquitous Computing
13
Coverage and connectivity configuration when Rc >= 2Rs
CCP Configuration protocol based on theorem 1, 2, 3 Can configure network to the specific coverage degree requested by the application Decentralized protocol that only depends on local states of sensing neighbors Scalability enforcement Applications can change its coverage degree at runtime without high communication overhead Guarantee degrees of coverage at the same time connectivity Advanced Ubiquitous Computing
14
Coverage and connectivity configuration when Rc >= 2Rs
Ks-coverage Eligibility Algorithm For Determination to become active Example of Ks-eligibility Ineligible for Ks = 1 Eligible for Ks > 1 Advanced Ubiquitous Computing
15
Coverage and connectivity configuration when Rc >= 2Rs
Ks-coverage Eligibility Algorithm (Theorem 4) A convex region A is Ks-covered by a set of sensors S if Intersection points between sensors or between sensors and A’s boundary exist in a region A All intersection points between any sensors are at least Ks-covered All intersection points between any sensor and A’s boundary are at least Ks-covered Advanced Ubiquitous Computing
16
Coverage and connectivity configuration when Rc >= 2Rs
Coverage patch S (same coverage area) (conclusion of theorem 4) Region A is Ks covered Coverage degree of a region coverage degree of all the intersection points in the same region Advanced Ubiquitous Computing
17
Ks-coverage eligibility algorithm
/*intersection point*/ SN(v) : all the active node within 2Rs range from v Advanced Ubiquitous Computing
18
Ks-coverage eligibility algorithm
Complexity : O(N3) Locations of all sensing neighbors required table of known sensing neighbors based on beacon from its communication neighbors Beacon message (HELLO) Rc >= 2Rs Its own location is included Rc < 2Rs Hidden node happens Aware of its multi-hop neighbors(two approaches) Broadcast HELLO with TTL All known neighbor information in HELLO CCP case Trade off between beacon overhead and the number of active nodes maintained by CCP Advanced Ubiquitous Computing
19
State transition of CCP
Listen Sleep Active (Periodically change) 1. Ineligible 2. Listen timer expiration 1. Eligible & join timer expiration 2. broadcast JOIN beacon Ineligible & Withdraw timer Expiration Eligible - Beacon is received - State evaluating Sleep timer expiration Beacon is received & update table - State evaluating Advanced Ubiquitous Computing
20
Coverage and connectivity configuration when Rc < 2Rs
Does not guarantee connectivity by CCP Integration of CCP with SPAN SPAN Decentralized coordination protocol for energy consumption while maintaining a communication backbone composed by active nodes CCP eligibility rule guarantee the coverage, and for connectivity, SPAN eligibility rule is adapted Advanced Ubiquitous Computing
21
Experimentation Coverage configuration - Ottawa protocol vs. CCP
Efficiency of CCP The configurability of CCP Coverage and communication performance System life time Advanced Ubiquitous Computing
22
Efficiency of CCP Average coverage degree (Ks =1)
Advanced Ubiquitous Computing
23
Efficiency of CCP Distribution of coverage degree
Comparison of active node number CCP eligibility rule can preserve coverage with fewer active nodes Advanced Ubiquitous Computing
24
The Configurability of CCP
Coverage degree vs. required coverage degree Average/min decrease as required degree increase Be in Proportional ratio Advanced Ubiquitous Computing
25
Coverage and communication performance
Simulation Environment NS-2 with CMU wireless extensions MAC layer with power saving support 400*400m2 coverage region with 160 nodes randomly distributed 10 sources and 10 sinks in opposite sides of the region with CBR flow to destination node (128byte packets with 3Kbps) 2Mbps bandwidth and a sensing range of 50m TwoRayGround radio propagation model Requested coverage degree Ks = 1 Comparison protocols SPAN CCP SPAN+CCP CCP-2Hop SPAN+CCP-2Hop Advanced Ubiquitous Computing
26
Coverage and communication performance
Network topology and coverage in a Typical run (Rc/Rs = 1.5) SPAN CCP SPAN-CCP-2Hop Small size dots : inactive nodes Medium size dots : sink and source at opposite sides Large size dots : active nodes Advanced Ubiquitous Computing
27
Coverage and communication performance
Coverage degree vs. Rc/Rs Packet delivery ratio vs. Rc/Rs Advanced Ubiquitous Computing
28
Coverage and communication performance
Number of active nodes vs. Rc/Rs Advanced Ubiquitous Computing
29
System life time Lifetime goes up if many factors can be controlled
SPAN + CCP Coverage lifetime, communication lifetime Until ratio’s dropping below the threshold (90%) Advanced Ubiquitous Computing
30
System life time System coverage life time
System communication life time Advanced Ubiquitous Computing
31
Conclusion Coverage efficiency Coverage configuration
One coverage with smaller number of active nodes than OTTAWA Irrespective of node density Coverage configuration Effectively enforcement of different coverage degrees Active nodes remain proportional to requested coverage degree Integrated coverage and connectivity configuration Rc>=2Rs Good performance with CCP Rc<2Rs SPAN + CCP-2Hop : most effective protocol for communication and coverage Advanced Ubiquitous Computing
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.