Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Figure 5 The effect of the spider color morph encountered by honeybees in Experiment 2 on the proportion of honeybees ... Figure 5 The effect of the spider.

Published byสุจินดา รักไทย Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Figure 5 The effect of the spider color morph encountered by honeybees in Experiment 2 on the proportion of honeybees ... Figure 5 The effect of the spider."— Presentation transcript:

1 Figure 5 The effect of the spider color morph encountered by honeybees in Experiment 2 on the proportion of honeybees ... Figure 5 The effect of the spider color morph encountered by honeybees in Experiment 2 on the proportion of honeybees that rejected a flower harboring a spider more often after a simulated attack by a spider (i.e., in Offer 2—see main text) than before the simulated attack (in Offer 1). Naïve honeybees were initially presented with a flower harboring either a red or yellow spider (“First spider color”), before being subject to a simulated attack, and then presented with a spider of the same or a different color (“Second spider color”). Both before and after the attack, flowers were presented up to 10 times to each honeybee until they were accepted. Error bars are 95% confidence intervals calculated using the binomial distribution. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 17 October 2018, Pages 240–248, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

2 Figure 4 The effect of the spider color morphs encountered by honeybees in Experiment 2 on the proportion of honeybees ... Figure 4 The effect of the spider color morphs encountered by honeybees in Experiment 2 on the proportion of honeybees which landed (response = land) and fed upon (response = feed) flowers the first time they were presented to them following a simulated attack by a spider (i.e., in Offer 2—see main text). Naïve honeybees were initially presented with a flower harboring either a red or yellow spider (“First spider color”), before being subject to a simulated attack, and then presented with a spider of the same or a different color (“Second spider color”). Error bars are 95% confidence intervals calculated using the binomial distribution. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 17 October 2018, Pages 240–248, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

3 Figure 3 Proportion of honeybees which fed on flowers harboring a spider on the first occasion they were presented ... Figure 3 Proportion of honeybees which fed on flowers harboring a spider on the first occasion they were presented after the honeybee had experienced a simulated attack associated with either a red or a yellow spider in Experiment 2 (i.e., in Offer 2—see main text). Data are shown for trials which were conducted on 4 different days. Error bars are 95% confidence intervals calculated using the binomial distribution. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 17 October 2018, Pages 240–248, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

4 Figure 2 Mean (±SE) number of times a flower harboring a spider was presented to, and rejected by, naïve foraging ... Figure 2 Mean (±SE) number of times a flower harboring a spider was presented to, and rejected by, naïve foraging honeybees before it was accepted in Experiment 2. Spiders were of 2 different color morphs (red and yellow), and data are shown for trials which were conducted on 4 different days. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 17 October 2018, Pages 240–248, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

5 Figure 1 Proportion of flowers of C. salvifolius, E
Figure 1 Proportion of flowers of C. salvifolius, E. plantagineum, and inflorescences of L. stoechas, that were ... Figure 1 Proportion of flowers of C. salvifolius, E. plantagineum, and inflorescences of L. stoechas, that were accepted (upper 2 panels) or inspected (lower panel) by honeybees. Accepted flowers are shown as a proportion of all flowers (upper panel) or a proportion of only those flowers which were inspected (middle panel). Flowers harbored a red or yellow female spider, or a male spider, or no spider (control). Error bars are 95% confidence intervals calculated using the binomial distribution. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 17 October 2018, Pages 240–248, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Download ppt "Figure 5 The effect of the spider color morph encountered by honeybees in Experiment 2 on the proportion of honeybees ... Figure 5 The effect of the spider."

Similar presentations

Figure 1 Experimental arena to study female locations in response to a green LED. The LED was switched on in the LED ... Figure 1 Experimental arena to.

Figure 1 Experimental arena to study female locations in response to a green LED. The LED was switched on in the LED ... Figure 1 Experimental arena to.
Figure 1 Female receptivity in the Playback Experiment

Figure 1 Female receptivity in the Playback Experiment
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.
Figure 1 Movement of 10 individuals during the last 5000 time steps of 2 example simulations, without (a) or with (b) ... Figure 1 Movement of 10 individuals.

Figure 1 Movement of 10 individuals during the last 5000 time steps of 2 example simulations, without (a) or with (b) ... Figure 1 Movement of 10 individuals.
Figure 4 ROMs have a morph-specific effect relative to active aggression but not display behavior in dominant males. ... Figure 4 ROMs have a morph-specific.

Figure 4 ROMs have a morph-specific effect relative to active aggression but not display behavior in dominant males. ... Figure 4 ROMs have a morph-specific.
Figure 1 We consider a scenario where the distributions of signals under safe or dangerous situations mean that a ... Figure 1 We consider a scenario where.

Figure 1 We consider a scenario where the distributions of signals under safe or dangerous situations mean that a ... Figure 1 We consider a scenario where.
Figure 1 Data-selection process

Figure 1 Data-selection process
Figure 1 Flow diagram detailing the systematic review process.

Figure 1 Flow diagram detailing the systematic review process.
Figure 1 Schematic representation of the experimental design.

Figure 1 Schematic representation of the experimental design.
Figure 1 Mechanism of mortality benefit associated with radial access

Figure 1 Mechanism of mortality benefit associated with radial access
Figure 1 Relationships between probability of prey discard and each parameter explored. To show the most robust ... Figure 1 Relationships between probability.

Figure 1 Relationships between probability of prey discard and each parameter explored. To show the most robust ... Figure 1 Relationships between probability.
Figure 1. Mean earnings of men and women over the early career (with 95 per cent confidence intervals) Figure 1. Mean earnings of men and women over the.

Figure 1. Mean earnings of men and women over the early career (with 95 per cent confidence intervals) Figure 1. Mean earnings of men and women over the.
Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios of 13 active ingredients used against a fall armyworm population collected in Puerto ... Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios.

Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios of 13 active ingredients used against a fall armyworm population collected in Puerto ... Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios.
Figure 1 Stegodyphus dumicola build retreats and 2-dimensional capture webs on (a) trees and (b) fences, 2 very ... Figure 1 Stegodyphus dumicola build.

Figure 1 Stegodyphus dumicola build retreats and 2-dimensional capture webs on (a) trees and (b) fences, 2 very ... Figure 1 Stegodyphus dumicola build.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.
Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment in female zebra finches shortly after a second injection with either tetanus toxoid ... Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment.

Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment in female zebra finches shortly after a second injection with either tetanus toxoid ... Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment.
Figure 1 The Kaplan–Meier curves of time to death post first hospitalization. hosp, hospitalization. Unless provided in the caption above, the following.

Figure 1 The Kaplan–Meier curves of time to death post first hospitalization. hosp, hospitalization. Unless provided in the caption above, the following.
AHA: American Heart Association; ALT: ...

AHA: American Heart Association; ALT: ...
Figure 1. Serum ceftazidime concentrations following intravenous administration. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.

Figure 1. Serum ceftazidime concentrations following intravenous administration. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.
Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating the correlation between the yearly absolute risk difference for both MACE and major ... Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating.

Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating the correlation between the yearly absolute risk difference for both MACE and major ... Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google