Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Disagreement over kind of organisation Wilson took action

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Disagreement over kind of organisation Wilson took action"— Presentation transcript:

1 Disagreement over kind of organisation Wilson took action
Wilson’s hope Europe prepared to try Problems in the USA Convincing the American people Absence of the USA Britain and France not strong enough People doubt the League of Nations Other priorities

2 All major nations would join the League All nations would disarm
Although there was agreement on a League being formed in 1918, there was disagreement about what kind of organisation it should be. President Wilson wanted the League of Nations to be like a world parliament where representatives of all nations could meet regularly to decide on any matters that affected all of them. Many British leaders thought that the best League would be a simple organisation that would just get together in emergencies. France proposed a strong League with its own army President Wilson got his way regarding the League and he insisted that discussions about a League should be a major part of the peace treaties. In 1919, Wilson took personal charge of drawing up plans for the League: All major nations would join the League All nations would disarm All disputes to be settled in the League and any decision had to be followed All members to protect one another if invaded and sign agreement to do so All members would stop trading with any member who broke the Covenant and went to war Wilson hoped that citizens of all countries would be so much against another conflict that this would prevent their leaders from going to war. Many politicians doubted Wilson’s plans and his arrogant style did not help matters. He acted as though only he knew the solutions to Europe’s problems Most people in Europe were prepared to give Wilson’s suggestions a try. They hoped no country would dare invade another if they knew that the USA and other powerful nations around the world would stop trading with them or send their armies to stop them. In 1919 hopes were high that the League, with the US as the driving force, could be a powerful peacemaker

3 Wilson faced many problems in the USA
Wilson faced many problems in the USA. He needed the approval of Congress to join the League and in the USA, this idea was not popular. The USA did not want what they referred to as “European entanglements”. European countries should now sort out their own problems Wilson tried to convince the American people to support the League but Congress voted not to in Despite being ill, Wilson continued to try and convince the USA to join. He asked Congress again in March 1920 but was defeated. When the League began in January 1920, the American chair was empty. The USA never joined. It was a bitter disappointment to Wilson and a body blow to the League In the absence of the USA, Britain and France were the most powerful countries in the League. Italy and Japan were also permanent members of the Council but throughout the 1920s and 1930s it was Britain and France who usually guided policy. Any action by the League needed the support of Britain and France Both Britain and France were poorly placed to have the main role in the League. Both had been weakened by the First World War. Neither country was quite the major power it had once been and neither had the resources to fill the gap left by the USA. Some British politicians said that they would not have joined the League if they had known that America would not join. Many felt that America was the only nation with the resources and influence to make the League work. In particular, they felt that Trade Sanctions would only work if America applied them

4 Arthur Balfour, a British representative in 1920, said:
For the leaders of Britain and France, the League posed a real problem. They were the ones who had to make it work, yet even at the start they doubted how effective it could be. Arthur Balfour, a British representative in 1920, said: “The League of Nations is not set up to deal with a world in chaos, or with any part of the world which is in chaos. The League of Nations may give assistance but it is not, and cannot be, a complete instrument for bringing order out of chaos.” Both Britain and France had other priorities. For example, British politicians were more interested in rebuilding British trade and looking after the British Empire than in being an international police force. Frances main concern was still Germany. It was worried that without an army of it’s own, the League was too weak to protect France from its powerful neighbour – Germany. France did not think that Britain was likely to send an army to help them. This made France quite prepared to bypass the League if necessary in order to strengthen its position against Germany A punch cartoon from 10 December The figure in the white top hat represents the USA A punch cartoon from 1929. Patrols of Peace. League of Nations. They say I've got no army; but why should I want one with these allies?" (With Mr Punch's congratulations to the Chief Scout on the coming-of-age of the movement - now international - which he inspired.)

5 A punch cartoon from July 1920
A punch cartoon from July This cartoon – entitled ‘Moral Persuasion’ appeared in the British satirical magazine Punch in July 1920.   The rabbit says: "My offensive equipment being practically nil, it remains for me to fascinate him with the power of my eye."


Download ppt "Disagreement over kind of organisation Wilson took action"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google