Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJuha Ketonen Modified over 5 years ago
1
European Development Cooperation to 2020: Emerging Issues
Simon Maxwell
2
The argument European Development Cooperation has been on a journey – and this will continue The next decade will see big challenges A new research policy partnership can put Europe in the forefront – if we get it right
3
EDC 2008: an infrastructure fit for purpose (almost)
EuropeAid DPS Deconcentration Code of Conduct Coherence Financial Perspectives CFSP Lisbon Treaty Pending for 2009: Commission structure, Budget/EDF, EPAs, future of the ACP
4
Is this the end of the beginning?
6
Elephant issues driving the development agenda
New actors: China, India, and the analytics of globalisation New securities: energy and other Global public goods, including climate change
8
Implication for governments?
9
The exam question: will there be a European comparative advantage – and a reform agenda?
Values Policies Structures Programmes Implementation N.B Positive questions Normative questions
10
Four scenarios for European Development Cooperation
Less Pro-poor More Pro-poor Nations
11
Europe RETROGRESSION PROGRESSION Less Pro-poor More Pro-poor SECESSION COMPRESSION Nations
12
The research commitment
(a) The story-teller (b) The networker The international think-tank in the modern age is A think tank . . . Working internationally . . . In the modern age! Take each of those aspects in turn. A think-tank works at the inter-face of research and policy. It is distinguished from a research organisation or a campaigning organisation by A commitment to research and to evidence-based policy-making; A determination to generate attractive ‘narratives’ which are relevant to policy; Engagement with policy-makers and other stake-holders in the design, implementation and dissemination of work programmes; A commitment to work with those who implement policy, the ‘street-level bureaucrats’ and the private sector. An understanding of and willingness to engage with policy-making processes and timetables. Some think-tanks are ‘independent’, others have a political affiliation. The slide shows my own representation of the four styles of policy entrepreneurship relevant to a think-tank: (a) story-teller, (b) networker, (c) engineer, and (d) fixer. (c) The engineer (d) The fixer 12
13
The policy commitment?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.