1. Department Of Energy Review LINAC Coherent Light Source Project
Conventional Facilities Overview and Status
Scope, Schedule, and Budget
J. Albino

2. CF Construction Organization

3. Beneficial Occupancy Dates
Central Utility Plant MAY08
Undulator Hall MAY08
Beam TransferMAY08
Near Experimental Hall MAY08
Beam Dump MAY08
Front End Enclosure MAY08
Xray/Diagnostics AUG08
Far Experimental Hall AUG08

4. CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES
Scope completed to date:
Co-occupancy
BTH West
Beam Transport Hall
Service Buildings 2.1, 2.2
Beam Transport Hall West upgrades
Natural Gas Line
New service line from Pacific Gas & Electric
Substation S522
Sector 20
Magnet Measurement Facility
Beam Transport Hall Switchboard
Sector AC Power Upgrade
Turner Construction Contract: 85% Complete (March 08)

5. Turner Construction Contract

6. BTH Headhouse looking west

7. BTH Headhouse looking west

8. BTH looking west

9. BTH looking east into Undulator Hall

10. Electron Beam Dump

11. Near Experimental Hall Subbasement looking west

12. Finishing the Final Floor Slab in X-ray Tunnel

13. Far Experimental Hall south rib
Installing re-bar in the Far Experimental Hall
Far Experimental Hall south rib

14. Far Experimental Hall west wall

15. Construction Adit Backfilling

16. Backfill operation over Beam Dump and FEE

17. BTH looking east

18. Surface Restoration in Research Yard

19. Next 6 Months CONSTRUCTION Complete Site Grading
Complete Mechanical / Electrical / Plumbing installations
Complete Surface Restoration (curb and gutters, site drainage, etc.)
Complete Punch Lists
Turner / Conventional Facilities Commissioning
Close-out Trade Contracts
Close-out Turner Contract (before December 2008)

20. Next 6 Months (cont.) ADMINISTRATION / DESIGN Turner Claim
Quantum recommendation from attorneys
Negotiations and settlement by CF/Turner staff
CF Staff Assignments
Roll-off Plan / Re-integration
Design of Far Hall Hutches
Conceptual Design / prelim. cost estimate – Spring/Summer 08
Final Design / cost estimate – Fall/Winter 08
Construction – Complete by July 09
Design of Space Renovation for Offices
Design start in 2nd Quarter of Fiscal Year 2009.
Construction complete 3rd Quarter of Fiscal Year 2010

21. Schedule Delays Weather Contingency Schedule Mitigation
Waterline breaks
Lab Operations
Undulator Hall slab
Saturated Soils at storm drain
NEH waterproofing (delayed other trades)
Late delivery of elevator for NEH
Productivity issues with electrical trade contractor; misc. steel
Resolution of trade contract scope of work (AIC Painting: Seismic bracing)
Weather Contingency
Statistics on no. rain days
100-year storm in January 2008
Schedule Mitigation
Re-sequencing of activities
Additional work force for electrical installations
System modifications to allow work to proceed (water valves)

22. Conventional Facilities Level 3 Milestones: (6 month lookahead)
Date
Near Experimental Hall Co-Occupancy
21-Apr-2008
CUP S522 Substation Beneficial Occupancy
30-Apr-2008
Undulator Facility Beneficial Occupancy
20-May-2008
Near Experimental Hall Beneficial Occupancy
Front End Enclosure Beneficial Occupancy
Beam Dump Beneficial Occupancy
Central Utility Plant Beneficial Occupancy
Beam Transport Hall Beneficial Occupancy
Far Experimental Hall Co-Occupancy
22-Jul-2008
X-Ray Transport Co-Occupancy
Far Experimental Hall Beneficial Occupancy
22-Aug-2008
X-Ray Transport Beneficial Occupancy

23. Conventional Facilities Performance
TEC
OPC
% Complete
SPI
CPI
Conventional Facilities
79.9%
1.00
13.9%
1.02
1.24

24. TEC Estimate to Complete
Cost to Go at WBS Level 3
1.09 Conventional Facilities
$M, Burdened, Escalated
TEC Estimate to Complete
Contingency %
Contingency
Total Estimated Cost (TEC)
27.32
28.3%
7.72
System Management & Integration
5.20
14.6%
0.76
Title 1 & Title 2 Conventional Facilities
0.0
Construction-T3 Conventional Facilities
22.12
31.5%
6.96
– includes FEH hutches and space renovation construction estimates

25. Integrated Safety Management
Define Work
Trade Contractor
Task Plan
Analyze Hazards
Job Safety Analysis – reviewed and approved by Safety
Pre-Task Meeting – conducted by foreman/crew members
Develop Controls
Personal Protective Equipment
Special Tools / Training
Safety Oversight
Perform the Work
Zero Accidents
Stop and Evaluate Changes in the Work or Controls
Work within Pre-task plan
Obtain Feedback and Improve
Safe Performance Observations
Monthly Safety Meetings
Safety Recognition Programs
Elicit feedback from the crews through direct communication

26. PROJECT SAFETY EXPERIENCE 29 March 2008
DART Rate
Total Project Hours
1.73 M Hours worked
LCLS Collaboration
1.27 M Hours worked
2 DART Incidents
None in past 24 months
LCLS Sub-Contractors
108 K Hours worked
No Injuries
TCCo
348 K Hours Worked
8 DART Incidents
CF Managed Work
MMF, Sector 20, Research Yard Demotion, Substation 522, etc, are examples of contracted work managed by CF. Their results speak for themselves. The management of these sub-contractors was not without issues, but the issues were identified and addressed by the CF UTRs in an effective manner.
John Galayda set the tone early in the management of sub-contracted work by personally reviewing the UTR work planning packages and insisting on resubmissions until he was satisfied that they understood the details of the work and the level of oversight expected of the UTRs. Project UTRs and Installation managers have the implementation and enforcement of construction safety as a condition of employment.
Technical Systems Installation
The management of the technical systems installation, beginning with the injector and continuing to today, has been accomplished with a work planning & control process the project developed.
The process relies on installation manager ownership of safety planning
The process relies heavily on the ISM 5 Core Functions
TCCo’s performance is causing us alarm
GC Managed Work and details of the LCLS stewardship of the contractor safety will be addressed in the CF breakout. However, at a high level lets take a look at what LCLS Management has been doing to address the problem.
Note: Injury rates based on 200 K hours (100 man years) of effort.

27. CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES
Project (Turner) Safety Performance History
LCLS Prepares for Field Work to begin
Safety Record as part of selection process
Site Safety and Health Plan
Driving home the message
Result: Procedural Violations
Actions
Stand Down of Construction Activities
Review of Approval Process for field work
Review of Project safety statistics – Analyze Hazards / Define Controls inadequate
Check/correction of existing documentation
Turner Construction “in full swing”
Data points indicate rising trends (near misses)
Paperwork trivialized by CM/GC and trade contractors
Result: Injury to Concrete Pump Operator
Actions:
CM/GC and trade Personnel changes / fines levied
Letter to Turner Corporate
Joint Safety Stewardship Committee established

28. CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES
Safety Performance (continued)
Turner Construction “over the hump”
Injury rate increases (DART rate above national average)
Turner personnel and trade personnel changes / fines levied
Tunnel contractor begins to de-mobilize
Result: Serious injuries (shoulder and hand)
Actions:
Work Activity stopped.
Trade personnel changes made
Safety statistics reviewed – Perform the Work inadequate
Letter to Turner Corporate
Plan for joint observation and monitoring of the work planning and execution prepared.
Review of JSA / Pre-task meeting notes
Attendance at each Pre-task meeting (Turner augmented by CF UTRs)
Monitoring Specific trade contractors or activities for safe work practices
We own Safety. It is our obligation to complete the project injury free!

29. Issues (and Mitigation)
Existing Utilities
Protection of aging utilities – replace/re-routed
Encountering unknown obstacles - Coordination with CEF
Mh49/55 – Coordinating existing services with Lab Ops.
Site Security and Safety
Safety Statistics
Re-emphasis on Safe Work
November 20, 2007 Stand-down
Safety Stewardship
Additional Staff defined and constantly evaluated
Construction Delays
Site Conditions – Saturated soils
Waterproofing Cut-and-cover structures
Above average precipitation

30. Issues (and Mitigation) cont.
Technical Systems Construction Tolerances
Undulator Hall tunnel invert slab
Clearance zones for follow-on work
Integration management and site walks
Disputes and Claims
Arbitration request resolved by attorneys
Turner pre-processing trade claims
No additional claims received by LCLS to date

31. Summary
Good Progress - civil construction nearing Beneficial Occupancy
CF staff has been strengthened to ensure adequate experience is integrated in all requirements
Continue to critically review change requests
Interface with SLAC, Tech. Systems, CM/GC
Safety concerns addressed jointly with Turner and trades.
Co-occupancy successful, although more installations desirable.
Civil construction will meet project needs for follow-on installations

32. End of presentation
The project has Integrated Safety into the Management of the LCLS Project