Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Rehabilitation of ectodermal dysplasia patients presenting with hypodontia: outcomes of implant rehabilitation part 1  Mariela Machado, Christine Wallace,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Rehabilitation of ectodermal dysplasia patients presenting with hypodontia: outcomes of implant rehabilitation part 1  Mariela Machado, Christine Wallace,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Rehabilitation of ectodermal dysplasia patients presenting with hypodontia: outcomes of implant rehabilitation part 1  Mariela Machado, Christine Wallace, Bruce Austin, Suhas Deshpande, Agnes Lai, Terry Whittle, Iven Klineberg  Journal of Prosthodontic Research  Volume 62, Issue 4, Pages (October 2018) DOI: /j.jpor Copyright © Terms and Conditions

2 Fig. 1 Case 1. (A and C) Initial panoramic radiograph and clinical view at presentation. Note anterior diastema and impacted teeth. (B) OPG showing the placement of 4 implants in the anterior mandible (4× 3.75/10.0mm Branemark MK III TiUnite, Nobel Biocare). (D–F) Clinical presentation following fitting of a mandibular implant FDP attached to 4 implants and a maxillary partial RDP; with diastema reduction. Journal of Prosthodontic Research  , DOI: ( /j.jpor ) Copyright © Terms and Conditions

3 Fig. 2 Case 2. (A) Initial panoramic radiograph. (B) OPG showing the placement of 4 implants (1× 3.75/10.0mm and 3× 3.75/11.5mm lOsseotite, Biomet 3i). (C–E) The patient received a mandibular implant FDP with a cantilever up to 10mm and a maxillary RDP. Journal of Prosthodontic Research  , DOI: ( /j.jpor ) Copyright © Terms and Conditions

4 Fig. 3 Case 4. (A and B) Pre and post-treatment OPGs. (C) Frontal view of maxillary (2× 3.3/10.0mm, 1× 4.0/10.0mm Nobel Speedy, Nobel Biocare and 1× 3.75/10.0 Branemark MK III TiUnite, Nobel Biocare) and mandibular implant FDP (2× 5.0/8.5mm and 2× 3.75/13.0mm Osseotite, Biomet 3i). (D and E) Occlusal view of implant supported FDPs. (F and G) Lateral views of FDPs, showing minimal cantilever of the mandibular FDP. Journal of Prosthodontic Research  , DOI: ( /j.jpor ) Copyright © Terms and Conditions

5 Fig. 4 Case 5. (A) Clinical view at presentation. Note deep bite suggesting a reduced occlusal vertical dimension. (B and C) Occlusal view of the maxilla and mandible at the presentation. (D–F) Ongoing orthodontics in the maxilla to allow space for further implant FDP in 12 and 22 position with preservation of remaining teeth. In the mandible, a FDP supported by 5 implants provides appropriate aesthetic rehabilitation and a restored occlusal vertical dimension with occlusal support for function (5× 3.75/11.5mm Branemark MK III TiUnite, Nobel Biocare). (G and H) Pre and post treatment OPGs. Journal of Prosthodontic Research  , DOI: ( /j.jpor ) Copyright © Terms and Conditions

6 Fig. 5 Patients perceptions recorded with a visual analogue scale (VAS) indicated from 0 to 10, pre and post-treatments regarding aesthetics and speech. Journal of Prosthodontic Research  , DOI: ( /j.jpor ) Copyright © Terms and Conditions

7 Fig. 6 Patients perceptions recorded with a visual analogue scale (VAS) indicated from 0 to 10, pre and post-treatments regarding diet and chewing. Journal of Prosthodontic Research  , DOI: ( /j.jpor ) Copyright © Terms and Conditions


Download ppt "Rehabilitation of ectodermal dysplasia patients presenting with hypodontia: outcomes of implant rehabilitation part 1  Mariela Machado, Christine Wallace,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google