Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byGwendoline Simmons Modified over 5 years ago
1
Comparison of treatment strategies for thoracic endograft infection
Konstantinos G. Moulakakis, MD, Spyridon N. Mylonas, MD, Constantine N. Antonopoulos, MD, John D. Kakisis, MD, George S. Sfyroeras, MD, George Mantas, MD, Christos D. Liapis, MD, FACS Journal of Vascular Surgery Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages (October 2014) DOI: /j.jvs Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
2
Fig 1 Flow chart of studies included in the review analysis.
Journal of Vascular Surgery , DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
3
Fig 2 Comparison of outcome among patients treated with endograft explantation and endograft preservation. CI, Confidence interval; Ev/Trt, events/treated with endograft explantation; Ev/Ctrl, events/control (endograft preservation). Journal of Vascular Surgery , DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
4
Fig 3 Comparison of outcome in patients receiving antibiotic therapy vs antibiotic therapy followed by additional procedures, such as mediastinal drainage, repeated thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), and repair of the fistula. CI, Confidence interval; Ev/Trt, events/treated with antibiotic therapy; Ev/Ctrl, events/control (antibiotics + additional procedures). Journal of Vascular Surgery , DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
5
Fig 4 Comparison of outcome in fistula patients (aortoesophageal fistula [AEF] or aortobronchial fistula [ABF]) vs nonfistula patients. CI, Confidence interval; Ev/Trt, events/treated for fistula; Ev/Ctrl, events/control (nonfistula). Journal of Vascular Surgery , DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.