Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The Evolution of Populations

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The Evolution of Populations"— Presentation transcript:

1 The Evolution of Populations
Chapter 23 The Evolution of Populations

2 Concept 23.3: Natural selection, genetic drift, and gene flow can alter allele frequencies in a population Three major factors alter allele frequencies and bring about most evolutionary change: Natural selection Genetic drift Gene flow

3 Animation: Causes of Evolutionary Change
Genetic Drift The smaller a sample, the greater the chance of deviation from a predicted result Genetic drift describes how allele frequencies fluctuate unpredictably from one generation to the next Genetic drift tends to reduce genetic variation through losses of alleles Animation: Causes of Evolutionary Change

4 Generation 1 Generation 2 Generation 3 p (frequency of CR) = 0.7
Fig CR CR CR CR CW CW CR CR CR CR CR CW CR CW CR CR CR CR CW CW CR CR CR CR CW CW CR CR CR CR CR CW CR CW CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CW CW CW CR CR Figure 23.8 Genetic drift CR CR CR CR CR CR CR CW CR CW CR CW Generation 1 Generation 2 Generation 3 p (frequency of CR) = 0.7 p = 0.5 p = 1.0 q (frequency of CW ) = 0.3 q = 0.5 q = 0.0

5 The Founder Effect The founder effect occurs when a few individuals become isolated from a larger population Allele frequencies in the small founder population can be different from those in the larger parent population

6 The Bottleneck Effect The bottleneck effect is a sudden reduction in population size due to a change in the environment The resulting gene pool may no longer be reflective of the original population’s gene pool If the population remains small, it may be further affected by genetic drift

7 Original population Bottlenecking event Surviving population
Fig. 23-9 Figure 23.9 The bottleneck effect Original population Bottlenecking event Surviving population

8 Fig Pre-bottleneck (Illinois, 1820) Post-bottleneck (Illinois, 1993) Range of greater prairie chicken (a) Number of alleles per locus Percentage of eggs hatched Population size Location Illinois 5.2 3.7 93 <50 1930–1960s 1,000–25,000 1993 <50 Figure Bottleneck effect and reduction of genetic variation Kansas, 1998     (no bottleneck) 750,000 5.8 99 Nebraska, 1998     (no bottleneck) 75,000– 200,000 5.8 96 Minnesota, 1998     (no bottleneck) 4,000 5.3 85 (b)

9 Effects of Genetic Drift: A Summary
Genetic drift is significant in small populations Genetic drift causes allele frequencies to change at random Genetic drift can lead to a loss of genetic variation within populations Genetic drift can cause harmful alleles to become fixed

10 Gene Flow Gene flow consists of the movement of alleles among populations Alleles can be transferred through the movement of fertile individuals or gametes (for example, pollen) Gene flow tends to reduce differences between populations over time Gene flow is more likely than mutation to alter allele frequencies directly

11 Fig Figure Gene flow and human evolution

12 Concept 23.4: Natural selection is the only mechanism that consistently causes adaptive evolution
Only natural selection consistently results in adaptive evolution

13 A Closer Look at Natural Selection
Natural selection brings about adaptive evolution by acting on an organism’s phenotype

14 Frequency of individuals
Fig Original population Frequency of individuals Phenotypes (fur color) Original population Evolved population Figure Modes of selection (a) Directional selection (b) Disruptive selection (c) Stabilizing selection

15 The Key Role of Natural Selection in Adaptive Evolution
Natural selection increases the frequencies of alleles that enhance survival and reproduction Adaptive evolution occurs as the match between an organism and its environment increases

16 Because the environment can change, adaptive evolution is a continuous process
Genetic drift and gene flow do not consistently lead to adaptive evolution as they can increase or decrease the match between an organism and its environment

17 Sexual Selection Sexual selection is natural selection for mating success It can result in sexual dimorphism, marked differences between the sexes in secondary sexual characteristics

18 Fig Figure Sexual dimorphism and sexual selection

19 Intrasexual selection is competition among individuals of one sex (often males) for mates of the opposite sex Intersexual selection, often called mate choice, occurs when individuals of one sex (usually females) are choosy in selecting their mates Male showiness due to mate choice can increase a male’s chances of attracting a female, while decreasing his chances of survival

20 Larval growth NSD LC better Larval survival LC better NSD
Fig EXPERIMENT Female gray tree frog SC male gray tree frog LC male gray tree frog SC sperm  Eggs  LC sperm Offspring of SC father Offspring of LC father Fitness of these half-sibling offspring compared RESULTS Figure Do females select mates based on traits indicative of “good genes”? Fitness Measure 1995 1996 Larval growth NSD LC better Larval survival LC better NSD Time to metamorphosis LC better (shorter) LC better (shorter) NSD = no significant difference; LC better = offspring of LC males superior to offspring of SC males.

21 Heterozygote Advantage
Heterozygote advantage occurs when heterozygotes have a higher fitness than do both homozygotes Natural selection will tend to maintain two or more alleles at that locus The sickle-cell allele causes mutations in hemoglobin but also confers malaria resistance

22 Plasmodium falciparum (a parasitic unicellular eukaryote) 7.5–10.0%
Fig Frequencies of the sickle-cell allele 0–2.5% Figure Mapping malaria and the sickle-cell allele 2.5–5.0% 5.0–7.5% Distribution of malaria caused by Plasmodium falciparum (a parasitic unicellular eukaryote) 7.5–10.0% 10.0–12.5% >12.5%

23 Frequency-Dependent Selection
In frequency-dependent selection, the fitness of a phenotype declines if it becomes too common in the population Selection can favor whichever phenotype is less common in a population

24 “left-mouthed” individuals
Fig “Right-mouthed” 1.0 “Left-mouthed” “left-mouthed” individuals Frequency of 0.5 Figure Frequency-dependent selection in scale-eating fish (Perissodus microlepis) 1981 ’82 ’83 ’84 ’85 ’86 ’87 ’88 ’89 ’90 Sample year

25 Neutral Variation Neutral variation is genetic variation that appears to confer no selective advantage or disadvantage For example, Variation in noncoding regions of DNA Variation in proteins that have little effect on protein function or reproductive fitness

26 Why Natural Selection Cannot Fashion Perfect Organisms
Selection can act only on existing variations Evolution is limited by historical constraints Adaptations are often compromises Chance, natural selection, and the environment interact

27 You should now be able to:
Explain why the majority of point mutations are harmless Explain how sexual recombination generates genetic variability Define the terms population, species, gene pool, relative fitness, and neutral variation List the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium

28 Apply the Hardy-Weinberg equation to a population genetics problem
Explain why natural selection is the only mechanism that consistently produces adaptive change Explain the role of population size in genetic drift

29 Distinguish among the following sets of terms: directional, disruptive, and stabilizing selection; intrasexual and intersexual selection List four reasons why natural selection cannot produce perfect organisms


Download ppt "The Evolution of Populations"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google