Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
IEEE 802.11 Regulatory AHC Draft Teleconference Plan
April 2009 doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 March 2010 IEEE Regulatory AHC Draft Teleconference Plan Date: Authors: Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion
2
April 2009 doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 March 2010 Abstract This presentation is the plan for the March 4, 2010 IEEE Regulatory Ad Hoc Committee teleconference. Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion
3
Agenda Approve the agenda Administrative items Introduction
March 2010 Agenda Approve the agenda Administrative items Introduction The regulatory summaries North America European Union Asia Focus: TGmb revisions to Annexes I and J Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion
4
Administrative Items March 2010 Ad Hoc Committee rules (per Adrian)
Introduce the ethics etc... slides in your meetings, you should not call for essential patents AHC, is a "committee of the whole" of the WG - i.e. any WG member can contribute; in practice, anybody who turns up can speak During f2f meetings, you can hold formal votes of only the voting members of ; on a telecon you can take straw polls, but not formal votes Required notices Affiliation FAQ - Anti-Trust FAQ - Ethics - IEEE Working Group Policies and Procedures - Chair and Secretary Chair is Rich Kennedy (Research In Motion) Recording Secretary needed Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion
5
Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings
March 2010 Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings. Technical considerations remain primary focus Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets. Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object. See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details. Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion
6
Introduction Outputs from this group must go through 802.18 Purpose
March 2010 Introduction Purpose Improve the working relationship between the technical experts and the regulatory specialists, especially when it comes to critical technical issues Scope The group will review new regulatory changes or impending changes affecting standards Each meeting will focus on the most critical issue at the time Critical Issue Focus Direct impact on IEEE current and future standards Response/Input deadlines Coordination with IEEE (RR-TAG) Coordination with the Wi-Fi Alliance Outputs from this group must go through Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion
7
Regulatory Summary – North America
March 2010 Regulatory Summary – North America US FCC continues work on defining 5 GHz band restrictions National Broadband Plan due March 17th FCC considers paying broadcasters for spectrum Canada Mexico Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion
8
Regulatory Summary – European Union
March 2010 Regulatory Summary – European Union ERM TG11 - EN revision Next meeting is next week; hoping to close the revision WG SE43 - Cognitive radio systems - White spaces ( MHz) Still focusing on sensing Ofcom Consultation on Uses for the 600 MHz band Will address in Orlando and respond through Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion
9
Regulatory Summary - Asia
March 2010 Regulatory Summary - Asia No updates at this time Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion
10
FOCUS: TGmb Resolution for CID 2113
March 2010 FOCUS: TGmb Resolution for CID 2113 “Regulatory class definition and use in IEEE is limited to not cover all countries where IEEE can be used due to Annex J only defining regulatory classes for US, EU, and JP” “…remove any normative references to regulation from normative text, and instead designate Operating Class to communicate the shared knowledge of normative requirements.” Replace “…maximum allowable transmit power…” with “…output power is measured in accordance with practices specified by the appropriate regulatory bodies.” “…add semantic labels to the behaviors in Annex I and the new table J.4.” Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion
11
March 2010 References Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.