Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

CANADIAN VOTING HISTORY

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "CANADIAN VOTING HISTORY"— Presentation transcript:

1 CANADIAN VOTING HISTORY

2 The FIRST VOTE: Prohibition
Woman’s Christian Temperance Union (WCTU) Founded in 1874, 10,000 members by 1900 Helped grow women’s suffrage movement Goal of prohibition Believed this would rid Canada of its social problems: Crime Domestic violence Political corruption Immorality P.M. Laurier allowed national Plebiscite (non binding vote)on prohibition in 1898 Give rise to suffrage

3 PROHIBITION IN 1898 A plebiscite on prohibition was held in Canada on 29 September 1898, the first national referendum in the country’s history.

4 Jurisdiction For Prohibition Against Prohibition Votes % Northwest Territories 6,238 68.8 2,824 31.2 British Columbia 5,731 54.6 4,756 45.4 Manitoba 12,419 80.6 2,978 19.4 New Brunswick 26,919 72.2 9,575 27.7 Nova Scotia 34,368 87.2 5,370 12.8 Ontario 154,498 57.3 115,284 42.7 Prince Edward Island 9,461 89.2 1,146 10.8 Quebec 28,436 18.8 122,760 81.2 Canada 278,380 51.2 264,693 48.8 Despite the majority in favour, Prime Minister Wilfrid Laurier's government chose not to introduce a federal bill on prohibition.

5 Conscription and How Women Got the Vote

6 The Conscription Crisis in Canada During World War Two

7 Background Information
Had been an issue in WW 1 By 1943, volunteer rates had dramatically declined. As a result, the Canadian government was worried that Canada would not be able to maintain an effective armed forces. You guessed it. Introduce Conscription!

8 King Introduces a Plebiscite on Conscription
King’s famous line was “conscription if necessary, but not necessarily conscription!” A very good example of double talk! His idea was to hold a plebiscite on the issue. non-binding question that asks the electorate to vote on a particular issue. MacKenzie King votes in the National Plebiscite in 1942

9

10 King Introduces a Plebiscite on Conscription
King’s reasoning was that a positive result on the plebiscite would give him a mandate to proceed with conscription. since it was a plebiscite he would not necessarily be forced to introduce conscription. Confusing? Clever? Many historians argue about the merits of King’s tactic. History Professor Michael Bliss thought it was a clever move U of T Professor Michael Bliss

11

12 The Result of the Plebiscite
The Result of the Plebiscite on Conscription was: 73% of Quebec voted “non” 80% of the Rest of Canada voted “Yes”

13 What did King Do? As a result, he delayed enacting conscription until 1944. most of them never saw combat.

14 The End Result Of the 13,000 who were sent overseas, only 2,500 reached the battlefield. 69 would die in action before the war ended (less than a year later). MacKenzie King would go on to win a majority government in the federal election of 1945 with most of his support from “la belle province. He was the great compromiser

15 NEWFOUNDLAND: The Last Colonial Outpost
1949

16 The Problem Severely in debt after WW II
Newfoundland, although proving to be of strategic importance during WW2, but afraid it will loose its independence and become a colony of Britain Problem: How does it prevent itself from falling to economic ruin

17 Newfoundland - Solutions
Newfoundland had 3 options. The people of Newfoundland would have to choose Newfoundland could become an independent nation “responsible self-government” Newfoundland could continue under British rule Britain no-longer wants to be responsible for it Britain burdened with rebuilding after WW2. Can’t afford to be responsible for Newfoundland as well Newfoundland could join Canada

18 Referendums Referendum #1
People of Newfoundland voted on all 3 options No single option received a majority vote Re-vote Referendum #2 People of Newfoundland voted on 2 options: Self-government or union with Canada

19 Referendum Results Those in the out-posts, fisheries, loggers and miners voted with Joey Smallwood for confederation with Canada Wanted financial security and stability The Merchants voted for “responsible self-government” Feared the market might move

20 Referendum Results – March 31, 1949
52% of Islanders favoured joining Canada 48% of islanders were for responsible self-government April 1, 1949 Newfoundland became Canada’s 10th province and Joey Smallwood became Canada’s last father of confederation Joey Smallwood first premier of Newfoundland

21 QUEBEC: THE THORN IN THE SIDE OF CANADIAN FEDERALISM

22 NATIONALISM Nationalism is a term referring to a doctrineor political movement that holds a nation, usually defined in terms of ethnicity or culture, has the right to constitute an independent or autonomous political community based on a shared history and common destiny. Nationalists feel that nationality is the most important aspect of one's identity, while some of them have attempted to define the nation in terms of race or genetics

23 The Quiet Revolution 1960 = Duplessis died.
Jean Lesage became leader of Quebec and spoke of a “Time for change”; a new Quebec government = Quiet Revolution: 1962 Quebec government Motto = “Masters in our own house”/“Maitres chez nous.”

24 Maitre Chez Nous The Birth of Separatism
French-Speaking-Quebeckers vs. English-Speaking-Canadians. French-Speaking-Quebeckers did not like how Canada seemed to be more English than French. Wanted to separate from Canada.

25 Rene Levesque and the Parti Quebecois
This gave rise to a new separatist political party - the Parti Quebecois - led by Rene Levesque. Levesque led his party to victory in the provincial election of 1976.

26 The “October Crisis” + Cross
During the 1970’s the FLQ decided to proceed with political kidnappings, since bombing raids were not bringing about the desired results. On October 5th, 1970 the British Trade commissioner, James Cross was kidnapped by the Liberation Cell of the FLQ. 1. 2.

27 Levesque and Bill 101 One of the most controversial measures of the Parti Quebecois was Bill The Charter of the French Language. This bill made French the only working language in Quebec.

28 The 1980 Referendum

29 The Quebec Referendum-1980
The Parti Quebecois organized a referendum on sovereignty-association for May 20, 1980. This meant independence from Canada but the retention of close economic ties. The campaign was very passionate and divisive.

30 The Quebec Referendum II
Federal politicians, like Pierre Trudeau, supported the “no” side in Quebec. 82% of the population turned out to vote and 59% rejected the proposal.

31 The Quebec Referendum III
Francophones Oui 60% Non 40% Anglophones Oui 9% Non 91% Immigrants Oui 16% Non 84%

32 The Winds of Change The 1980 referendum convinced Pierre Trudeau that constitutional change was necessary. The Liberal government of Pierre Trudeau finally undertook the difficult task of patriating the constitution. This was achieved in 1982 but without the approval of Quebec.

33 Kitchen Compromise

34 THE KITCHEN COMPROMISE
Federal Minister of Justice Jean Chrétien and a couple provincial politicians hammer meet on Nov 4, 1981 Provincial premiers woken up in hotel to sign the deal Québec premier Lévesque staying at other hotel, surprised by deal in the morning, refuses to agree to it, wants referendum on Constitution Referred to as “Night of the Long Knives” in Québec Compromise includes current amending formula (7/50 formula) and the notwithstanding clause, allowing provinces to opt-out of Charter (5 years)

35 The Meech Lake Accord 1987 Meech Lake was an effort to complete the constitutional process and meet some of Quebec’s demands. It included: 1. The confirmation of “distinct society” status for Quebec in order to bring the province into the constitution. 2. The right to allow provinces to nominate Supreme Court judges. The accord was not ratified by all ten provinces and failed. Questions For Discussion 36. What does the phrase distinct society mean? Why do you think some Canadians objected to this phrase?

36 Distinct Society What did this term mean?
Was Quebec to be considered different or special? If Quebec was to be special did this mean that additional powers would be given to the Quebec government?

37 The Failure of the Meech Lake Accord
This accord was acceptable in Quebec but eventually failed in Manitoba. It was seen in Quebec as a rejection by the rest of Canada. The separatist movement in Quebec was revived by the emotion surrounding the failure of “Meech.”

38 The Bloc Quebecois The failure of the Meech Lake Accord resulted in the formation of a new federal political party – the ”Bloc Quebecois.” In 1993 to become the official opposition party in Ottawa. The first leader of the “Bloc” was Lucien Bouchard.

39 The Charlottetown Accord 1992
This was the second attempt to amend the constitution. It promised - 1. “Distinct society” status for Quebec. 2. Aboriginal self-government. 3. Senate reform It failed to pass a national referendum in October 1992 when a large majority Canadians voted no. HERE’S WHY IT FAILED!!!!! Questions For Discussion 37. Find out why the Charlottetown Accord failed to pass a national referendum?

40 RESULTS PROVINCE YES% NO% Alberta 39.8 60.2 British Columbia 31.7 68.3
Manitoba New Brunswick Newfoundland Nova Scotia Ontario PEI Quebec Saskatchewan Northwest Territories Yukon Territory Nation total

41 Parizeau’s “Money & the Ethnic Vote” speech, from the CBC Archives.
The 1995 Quebec Referendum QUEBEC HAD FELT ‘STABBED IN THE BACK’ from 1982 and not wanted ( 1987 and 1992 In 1995 the people of Quebec voted on the question of sovereignty. Jacques Parizeau, the premier, led the “Yes” forces in Quebec but the question was defeated by a narrow margin. The “No” side won by 51 per cent to 49 percent. There was shock in the rest of Canada but no immediate solution. Parizeau’s “Money & the Ethnic Vote” speech, from the CBC Archives.

42 The Supreme Court Ruling 20 August 1998: SO MUCH FOR DEMOCRACY BY US!!
The federal government asked the Supreme Court three questions in 1996. 1. Can Quebec secede unilaterally from Canada under the constitution? 2. Does it have the right to secede unilaterally under international law? 3. If there is a conflict between Canadian and international law, which takes precedence?

43 The Constitutional Right to Secede (Question 1)
“The Constitution (guarantees) order and stability, and accordingly secession of a province ‘under the Constitution’ could not be achieved unilaterally…” Negotiation with the other provinces within the terms of the constitution would be required for Quebec to secede.

44 International Law and the Right to Secede (Question 2)
The court decided that the right to secede exists but not at the expense of the stability and integrity of Canada. Only if a people were colonized or oppressed would the court consider unilateral secession acceptable. This, clearly, does not apply to Quebec.

45 General Conclusions of the Supreme Court (Question 3)
The court ruled that there was no conflict between Canadian and International law. The Supreme Court’s ruling was open to interpretation by both sides but offered little comfort to the separatist movement in Quebec. *Quebec can hold another referendum on a “clear” question and if it wins this referendum Canada and Quebec must negotiate the terms of secession (but now federal gov’t in charge of referendum)

46 Problems Associated with Quebec Separation
What happens to the large French speaking population outside of Quebec? What happens to the anglophone population inside of Quebec? How do we divide the economic resources and the national debt of the country? How does the rest of Canada remain united?

47 Recent Changes in Quebec
Some people think that the tide has turned against the Separatists (2014 Provincial elections PQ loss) as most ‘extreme’ getting older Immigration is reducing the influence of “pur laine” Quebecers – the chief supporters of separation.


Download ppt "CANADIAN VOTING HISTORY"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google