1. What should be discussed
Results Framework and results tracker
Variance
Plan B

2. What should be discussed
WP1:
What matooke delivered the NARITA?
What matooke delivered the new 48 selected hybrids (this is not linked to amount of seeds and amount of hybrids)
All PYT material from IITA and NARO should be evaluated in the same field

3. What should be discussed
Reduce breeding blocks because:
Enough seeds
Enough hybrids
Is there a need to use genetic relationships as part of the crossing schemes?
Should EMBRAPA and IEB/IITA use the same SSR?

4. What should be discussed
What can WP2-5 offer NOW to WP1

5. What should be discussed
WP2:
List of germplasm screened:
Different for each pest/disease
No link to breeding material
No link to segregation populations
Mapping of pests/diseases:
Country
Testing sites
Breeding sites

6. What should be discussed
Should we infect the 5 testing sites with everything?

7. What should be discussed
WP3:
QTL analysis for BS?
Genomic prediction:
Use average or individual info per genotype
What needs to be improved when we redo the work for plantain?
Are we using all criteria of the farmers?
Plantain sequencing: what about EAHB?

8. What should be discussed
WP4
Start baby trials when mother trials are finished
Will we process the new 48 hybrids in the same way as the current NARITAs?
Any suggestions for the current breeding selection criteria?

9. What should be discussed
WP5:
BMOP
Mislabbeling
There is no IITA ontology=breeder’s ontology
When do we start actually using it?