1. A High Intensity Neutrino Oscillation Facility in Europe
Status of EUROnu
Costing, safety, etc
Annual reports
Milestones and deliverables for WP1
This meeting

2. Status of EUROnu 21/48th finished! Much progress since last meeting:
Only just started then
This meeting will show significant progress
Using EC metrics
34 documents
52 meetings
7 new associates since we started
Many issues raised at 1st meeting, by IAP, etc, dealt with

3. Status of EUROnu Scientifically, EUROnu not important!
Politically it is:
Recognised as part of CERN strategy
Main European activity on 2nd generation facilities
Strong connection to IDS-NF
Point of contact with CERN management
Input to SPC Neutrino Panel
ECFA/Strategy secretariat (+ ICFA?) review panel
Review IDS and next EUROnu report
Maintains important role
Internationalises further

4. Costing, Safety, etc Outputs of EUROnu: Performance Cost Safety
(Technical) risk
very important!
very limited resources
needs to be done efficiently and coherently as pos.
taken on by Ilias

5. Costing Workshop Need a costing panel Need a PBS/WBS
allows exploitation of overlaps
same approach, assumptions, etc
Combined approach to experts
Use CLIC tool:
some work already done
use well defined (defendable) techniques
even methods of making a choice
More later

6. Safety To come next Workshop planned
Focus on big, potentially show-stopping issues
Technical risk:
identify issues requiring further R&D
focus large impact things
hopefully, comes out of other work?

7. Annual Report #1 Not (quite) done with! Was submitted late
More (trivial) information requested
All now received and submitted
Many lessons learnt (by me!)
We must all do better next time

8. Annual Report #2 Includes independent Technical review Outcome between
Everything is fine, continue unchanged
Cancel and repay EC funding
Next report: submitted by end October!
all due milestones and deliverables done
WP reports
Form Cs done & signed
Explanations of costs done
Work will start in August
Review during next annual meeting: RAL – Jan/Feb 2011

9. WP1 Deliverables Del. no. [1] Deliverable name WP no. Lead beneficiary
Estimated indicative person-months
Nature[2]
Dissemination level [3]
Delivery date[4]
(proj.
month) D1
Requirements for proton driver 2 12 R PU 6 D2
Report on 1st year activities
All 1 47 D3
Review detector performance of baseline scenarios 5 4 36 D4
Review physics of baseline scenarios and optimisation 24 D5
Review of baseline muon front end and large aperture acceleration 3 56 15 D6
Comparison criteria 9 18 D7
Collection device construction 40 P D8
Bunching performance evaluation 7 D9
Interim report 94
D10
Target and collection design report
175 30
D11
Cost and performance evaluation for reference muon front-end
D12
Report on the experimental validation of the collection device for Li-8 90
D13
Project review documentation
122
D14
Target & collector integration 8 50
D15
Beam characteristics 31
D16
Optimisation of baseline detectors 59
D17
Recommendation of the reference Neutrino Factory design 38
D18
Performance and cost evaluation of the facility 42
D19
Physics comparison between the facilities 89 43
D20
Comparison between facilities 25 46
D21
Final report
240 48
TOTAL
1407

10. WP1 Deliverables D8 done and being written up
Criteria not completely defined, e.g. θ13 known?
But use obvious:
Physics: δ θ Δm223
Cost and schedule
Safety: personnel environmental impact
Risk: technical only show-stoppers

11. WP1 Deliverables Ultimately, would be good to have figure of merit
Techniques exist to do this
Easier to do if θ13 known
Otherwise, use 3 cases:
large, e.g. >10-2
intermediate, e.g. >10-3 & <10-2
small, e.g. <10-3
Needs results of costing and safety panels

12. List and schedule of milestones Delivery date from Annex I
no.
Milestone name
WPs no's.
Lead beneficiary
Delivery date from Annex I
Comments
1.1
Review of 1st year milestones, deliverables & costs
All 1 12
Reviewed by Governing Board
2.1
Proton driver report 2
Parameters reviewed by external expert
4.1
Baseline Beta-Beam scenario 4 3
Documentation reviewed
5.1
Review detector performance for Neutrino Factory 5 6
Report reviewed
6.1
Update physics potential
6,5,2
3.1
Evaluation of baseline front-end complete 15
Report reviewed by external expert
4.2
Design of collection device
Drawings qualified by external expert
3.2
Evaluation of baseline acceleration systems complete 18
4.3
Lattice frozen for production ring
Optics qualified by external expert
1.2
Initial facility comparison 20
Reviewed by external expert
4.4
New decay ring optics for 8Li and 8B 21
1.3
Review on interim milestones, deliverables & costs 24
2.2
Preliminary design of target and collector 7
2.3
Preliminary target/collector integration report 8
2.4
1st estimation of neutrino beam intensity
Report qualified by external expert
3.3
Evaluation of performance of alternative cooling and acceleration schemes
3.4
Specification of proton-beam handling system complete 14
4.5
Interim report on reaction channels, collimation and magnet protection
5.2
Review of systematic errors for all detectors.
6.2
Review of systematic errors in all facilities. Unified treatment.
6,5 11
6.3
Scenarios for the B and Li Beta Beams
6,4
Report
reviewed
6.4
Physics performance of all facilities with update of fluxes
6,5,4
3.5
Benchmark costing for muon front-end and acceleration systems 30
1.4
Review of 3rd year milestones, deliverables & costs 36
2.5
Final target/collector integration report
4.6
Full simulation of production ring
Simulation results reviewed
5.3
Choice of optimal baseline scenarios for all facilities.
6.5
Theoretical impact of future measurements in physics of flavour and choice of optimal baseline scenarios for all facilities.
3.6
Initial health-and-safety evaluation of proton-beam handling system complete 38
2.6
Design of target station 40
3.7
Performance evaluation complete
5.4
Comparison of detector performance for all facilities
2.7
Report on neutrino beam intensity 42
6.6
Comparison of physics performance of all facilities
6,2,3,4,5 43
1.5
Final comparison of facilities 46
Reviewed by Governing Board, International Advisory Panel, Coordination Board and external experts
WP1 Milestones

13. WP1 Milestones Not possible to do yet
Will use the most recent results from WP6
Hence, preliminary physics only comparison

14. This Meeting Very important! Preparation for technical review……
……..but plenty of science as well
Welcome to the 2nd annual EUROnu meeting!