Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKelsey Hogan Modified over 10 years ago
1
Invisible Men: Mass Incarceration and the Myth of Black Progress Becky Pettit Department of Sociology University of Washington bpettit@u.washington.edu October 2012 bpettit@u.washington.edu
3
I am invisible, understand, simply because people refuse to see me. -Ralph Ellison, Invisible Man (1952)
10
United States Prison and Jail Population, 1925-2008
11
Civilian Incarceration Rates, Men 20-34, by Education and Race White Men 1980199020002008 LTHS2.43.87.712.0 HS/GED0.81.42.32.0 Some College0.20.40.3 All0.61.11.61.8
12
Civilian Incarceration Rates, Men 20-34, by Education and Race White Men 1980199020002008 LTHS2.43.87.712.0 HS/GED0.81.42.32.0 Some College0.20.40.3 All0.61.11.61.8 Black Men 1980199020002008 LTHS10.619.630.237.2 HS/GED4.77.111.79.1 Some College1.92.92.1 All5.28.311.211.4
13
Educational Attainment of Male Inmates, 20-34 1980 WhiteBlack LTHS40.752.7 HS/GED54.234.3 Some College16.113.1
14
Educational Attainment of Male Inmates, 20-34 19802008 WhiteBlackWhiteBlack LTHS40.752.7 61.8 HS/GED54.234.335.530.6 Some College16.113.111.87.7
15
Data Non-institutionalized population Current Population Survey (CPS March 1980-2008)
16
Data Non-institutionalized population Current Population Survey (CPS March 1980-2008) Inmate population Aggregate inmate counts (1980-2008)
17
Data Non-institutionalized population Current Population Survey (CPS March 1980-2008) Inmate population Aggregate inmate counts (1980-2008) Survey of Inmates of Local Jails (1978, 1983, 1989, 1996, 2002) Survey of Inmates of State Correctional Facilities (1979, 1986, 1991, 1997, 2004) Survey of Inmates of Federal Correctional Facilities (1991, 1997, 2004)
18
Method Construct estimates of indicators for household(HH) and inmate (I ) populations
19
Method Construct estimates of indicators for household(HH) and inmate (I ) populations Calculate weighted average of indicators including both groups using weights derived from CPS estimates of the civilian population
20
Percent of Men Not Completing High School/GED, 2008. N-H WhiteN-H Black Observed7.213.5
21
Percent of Men Not Completing High School/GED, 2008. N-H WhiteN-H Black Observed7.213.5 Adjusted8.019.0
22
Percent of Men Not Completing High School/GED, 2008. N-H WhiteN-H Black Observed7.213.5 Adjusted8.019.0 % Difference11%41%
23
Racial Inequality in High School Dropout Rates, Men 20-34, 1980-2008
24
Selection Effect due to Incarceration
25
Conclusions Prison or jail is normative among some social and demographic groups Excluding inmates from surveys obscures portraits of inequality Including inmates, we find: – No improvement in high school dropout rate among young, black men – Young, black, male dropouts are more likely to be in prison or jail than be employed – The same fraction of young, black male dropouts voted in 2008 as in 1980
26
Why is Invisible Men Challenging? Out of the mainstream of American sociology, which now focuses on formulating and testing scientific hypotheses Contradicts the notion of black progress in the post-civil rights era Implicates much social science (and social scientists) as complicit
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.