Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Time for action – climate change, risks and challenges

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Time for action – climate change, risks and challenges"— Presentation transcript:

1 Time for action – climate change, risks and challenges
Dr. Matthias Lüdeke & Dr. Fritz Reusswig Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research Climate Conference Bucharest, World Trade Center, 22 March 2018

2 ? Attribution Global mean temperature Atmospheric CO2 concentration
Observed global mean combined land and ocean surface temperature anomalies, from 1850 to 2012 from three data sets Matthias Lüdeke

3 -> Global warming is anthropogenic
Attribution Global Temperature Model results shown are Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) multi-model ensemble ranges, with shaded bands indicating the 5 to 95% confidence intervals. IPCC 2014 WG 1-AR5 / CMIP5 (first evaluation done in 2007 (AR4), showing the same result) -> Global warming is anthropogenic Matthias Lüdeke

4 Projection CMIP5 multi-model simulated time series from 1950 to 2100 for change in global annual mean surface temperature relative to 1986–2005. CMIP 5 -> clear difference in global warming between „business as usual“ (rcp8.5) and mitigation path (rcp2.6) Matthias Lüdeke

5 Projection Change in N-summer (JJA) precipitation until 2090
under the rcp6.0/A1B scenario Relative changes in precipitation (in percent) for the period 2090–2099, relative to 1980–1999. Values are multi-model averages based on the SRES A1B scenario for June to August. White areas are where less than 66% of the models agree in the sign of the change and stippled areas are where more than 90% of the models agree in the sign of the change. CMIP 3 Matthias Lüdeke

6 Projection CMIP5 for Romania, end of century:
Emission Scenario: rcp Temp. - annual Temp. - summer Prc . - annual Prc . - summer 8.5 +4.5°C (+/-0.5) +5.5°C (+/-0.5) -7% (+/-8) -22% (+/-8) 6.0 +3°C(+/-0.5) +4°C (+/-0.5) -2.5% (+/-5) -18% (+/-10) 2.6 +1.2°C (+/-0.5) +1.7°C (+/-0.5) -0%(+/-5) -2,5% (+/-5) -> strongly increasing drought event frequency/intensity for rcp 8.5/6.0 ! Matthias Lüdeke

7 Last decades: increasing trend of scorching heat intensity in Romania:
Sum(Tmax≥32°C), month VI-VIII Romania’s 6th National Communication on Climate Change and 1st Biennial Report To be expected to further increase strongly under Climate Change! Case of Berlin under rcp8.5: 4 times the number of present heat days at the end of the century – severe heat waves would become common! (from the evaluation of CORDEX-results – could also be done for Romania) Matthias Lüdeke

8 Projection Future heat-waves, droughts and floods in 571 European cities Selma B Guerreiro et al 2018 Environ. Res. Lett Constanța, Timișoara Generalize to get back to global impacts -small island states -global tipping points, e.g. irreversible inland ice melt Matthias Lüdeke

9 The Paris agreement: +1.5°C
Examples for measures/processes for the different stages Matthias Lüdeke

10 Assessment of EU‘s NDCs
Intended Nationally Determined Contributions, INDC Climate action tracker, 2018/ PRIMAP Matthias Lüdeke

11 Criteria for „Fair share“
Assessment of NDCs Criteria for „Fair share“ Historical Responsibility • Cumulative greenhouse gases emissions per capita Capacity to mitigate • GDP Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) per capita • Human Development Index (HDI) Potential to mitigate • Emissions intensity: Energy related greenhouse gas emissions per unit of GDP • Emissions per capita • Carbon intensity: greenhouse gas emissions per unit of energy production Intended Nationally Determined Contributions, INDC Historical Responsibility • Cumulative greenhouse gases emissions per capita, excluding deforestation emissions: starting and end years for accounting cumulative emissions are flexible • Cumulative greenhouse gases emissions per capita, including deforestation emissions Capacity to mitigate • GDP Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) per capita • Human Development Index (HDI) at a certain year Potential to mitigate • Emissions intensity: Energy related greenhouse gas emissions per unit of GDP • Emissions per capita: Total national greenhouse gas emissions per capita, including deforestation emissions. • Carbon intensity: greenhouse gas emissions per unit of energy production Matthias Lüdeke

12 BACKUP-slides Matthias Lüdeke

13 Figure SPM.5 | Radiative forcing estimates in 2011 relative to 1750 and aggregated uncertainties for the main drivers of climate change. Values are global average radiative forcing (RF14), partitioned according to the emitted compounds or processes that result in a combination of drivers. The best estimates of the net radiative forcing are shown as black diamonds with corresponding uncertainty intervals; the numerical values are provided on the right of the figure, together with the confidence level in the net forcing (VH – very high, H – high, M – medium, L – low, VL – very low). Albedo forcing due to black carbon on snow and ice is included in the black carbon aerosol bar. Small forcings due to contrails (0.05 W m–2, including contrail induced cirrus), and HFCs, PFCs and SF6 (total 0.03 W m–2) are not shown. Concentration-based RFs for gases can be obtained by summing the like-coloured bars. Volcanic forcing is not included as its episodic nature makes is difficult to compare to other forcing mechanisms. Total anthropogenic radiative forcing is provided for three different years relative to 1750.

14 rcps Figure SPM.10 | Global mean surface temperature increase as a function of cumulative total global CO2 emissions from various lines of evidence. Multimodel results from a hierarchy of climate-carbon cycle models for each RCP until 2100 are shown with coloured lines and decadal means (dots). Some decadal means are labeled for clarity (e.g., 2050 indicating the decade 2040−2049). Model results over the historical period (1860 to 2010) are indicated in black. The coloured plume illustrates the multi-model spread over the four RCP scenarios and fades with the decreasing number of available models in RCP8.5. The multi-model mean and range simulated by CMIP5 models, forced by a CO2 increase of 1% per year (1% yr–1 CO2 simulations), is given by the thin black line and grey area. For a specific amount of cumulative CO2 emissions, the 1% per year CO2 simulations exhibit lower warming than those driven by RCPs, which include additional non-CO2 forcings. Temperature values are given relative to the 1861−1880 base period, emissions relative to 1870. Decadal averages are connected by straight lines Matthias Lüdeke

15 atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2) from Mauna Loa
(19°32’N, 155°34’W – red) and South Pole (89°59’S, 24°48’W – black) since 1958;

16 Projection Matthias Lüdeke

17 Projection Matthias Lüdeke

18 Projections for Berlin,
AFOK 2015 Matthias Lüdeke

19 Matthias Lüdeke

20 Matthias Lüdeke


Download ppt "Time for action – climate change, risks and challenges"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google