1. West-Life: the last six months May-Oct 2018
APM, Madrid 4 May 2018

2. Urgent TODOs GDPR compliance M30 deliverables:
D7.5 A HADDOCK server for EM
D3.6 Update of requirements by other RI

3. Milestones
M1.4 M4
Sustainability report approved by Executive Steering Committee
Instruct 30
Report approved by Executive Steering Committee 1
M7.9
M32
Existing services updated to existing data types
STFC
Where an existing metadata standard is identified, and is not being used, the web service will be updated to handle the standard. This will be highlighted on the service portal. 7
M4.5
M15
Final deployment of the consolidated platform
INFN 34
New interfaces/services integrated in the platform ready for production use by other WPs and published in the wiki 4

4. Deliverables 6.3 EMBL 32 Assembly queries D6.4 STFC 33 Provenance 5.9
Instruct 36
Update report on activities of the helpdesk
5.8 UU
Report on the access and usage statistics
4.6 MU
Final report on deployment of consolidated platform and the overall architecture
2.5
Engagement report
1.7
Final report
1.5
Sustainability report

5. Sustainability Instruct will host a migration hackathon in September
EOSC pilot application(s)

6. Finishing up… Use of W-L SSO Integrate SSO with Use of VF
CCD
Integrate SSO with
EGI CheckIn, Indigo
Use of VF
CCD, AMPS-NMR
Link VF to pdb-dev?
ARP/wARP for NMR

7. …Finishing up… SSBio Jupyter? AUP deployment Cookie compliance
New services, add to portal and bio.tools:
SpotON, DipCheck
VM update
Log referer to trace use of W-L interactome
GDPR compliant if user not identifiable

8. …Finishing up NLP: GROMACScloud Deploy Repository Summary Paper?
Deployment to EuropePMC
3dBionotes
PDB-REDO
GROMACScloud
Deploy Repository
Summary Paper?
Acta Cryst D?
joint submission with WP7 papers?

9. Final Report and Final Review
Part A: structured tables from SyGMa
Inc. Risks
Part B:
Objectives
Explanation of Work for each WP
Based on presentations at this meeting
Impact
Dissemination
Followup of reviewers’ recommendations
Time to start writing now

10. Proposed Mitigation actions
Risks
Description WP
Likeli- hood
Impact
Risk score
Proposed Mitigation actions
PM18 evaluation
PM24 evaluation R7
Sustainability
WP2 4 16
Aim to deliver useful tools to industry to generate income; take architectural choices with sustainability in mind
See response to reviewers
Discussion ongoing R6
Poor take up 3 5 15
Some development partners are part of the user community; dissemination workshops
User presentations at APM R8
Brexit
Main partner STFC is unlikely to be in ERA for any follow-on project.
UK government guarantee of H202 funds mitigates
No impact on project R1
No sustainability plan in place by end of project
WP1 12
New milestone introduced
Plan under discussion R4
Staff retention
Internal communication; the project goals areambitious so support personal development
Staff replaced at Luna and Instruct
Deliverables not impacted
R16
Resistance to data sharing
WP6
Make it easy to do the right thing; collaborate with Instruct on policy.
Risk not realised; D6.2 will address this
Risk not realised
R13
Integration of tools may fail
WP5 2 10
Use metrics to monitor, and reprioritise as necessary R2
Significant underspending 9
Transfer of money between partners
All partners on track to supply resource as planned
Proposed extension to bridge to EINFRA-EOSC-04

11. Using unclaimed 14PM Transfer between partners? More dissemination?
STFC happy to transfer
More dissemination?

12. Supplementary material

13. FP7 policy on extensions
" the Commission services will, in future, more closely examine each request for an extension to the duration of the project to ensure that they are only given where there is a clear added value for the project, or where external events (not reasonably foreseeable at the point of signing the grant) mean that it is impossible to complete the work in the agreed timeframe. …
(g) In principle, a grant extension of more than six months could be considered as disproportionate if not due to exceptional reasons. Extensions of longer than six months, or a second extension, must be absolutely exceptional.
(h) Requests for extension of the grant to undertake additional work should not be accepted, even if it is claimed to be without additional cost.“

14. Budgetary details Grant amount in Euros RP1
Total Spend as of 31st Mar 2018
Addn reporting
Notes on addn reporting
STFC
795750
NKI AVL
194625
Nov 17 to April 18
EMBL
641750
Q10 only MU
393250
RP2 to end of March
CSIS
402500
RP2
CIRPMMP
406250
no report
INSTRUCT
152750 UU
392250
54093
LUNA
258000
21,499
INFN
344000
Q9, but can't find Q10