1. 3rd Meeting of the BFUG Working Group Reporting Riga, 16 June 2010
Results of the online consultation on the form of the integrated report Eurydice, Eurostat, Eurostudent
3rd Meeting of the BFUG Working Group Reporting
Riga, 16 June 2010

2. Length of the report

3. Form of the report

5. Character of the report
Measuring progress against aims stated
Focus on all the action lines from the communiqués
Show ‘progress’ of Bologna implementation
Measures progress where possible against aims stated in the communiqués,
Communicate achievements
[blue: country responses / red: stakeholders / green: conclusion by data collectors]
Progress: FI, FR, DE, LV, SI, UK
Policy-tool: AT, FR, NL, SI
Background for policy-making: FI, CZ, LV, DE, NL
Shortcomings in data availability: CZ

6. Coherence with previous maintaining coherence with previous reports
Tool for policy making
Policy tool for ministers/decision-makers
(Comprehensive) background document for policy-making
[blue: country responses / green: conclusion by data collectors]
Progress: FI, FR, DE, LV, SI, UK
Policy-tool: AT, FR, NL, SI
Background for policy-making: FI, CZ, LV, DE, NL
Shortcomings in data availability: CZ

7. Identify data availability and quality
Concise report
As concise as possible
Reliability of data
Identify data availability and quality
Provide reliable and comprehensive information
[red: responses from stakeholders / green: conclusion by data collectors]

8. Character of the report
Comparisons, identifying differences
Identify divergence in the implementation
Comparative overview of the implementation of HE reforms
Allow valid country comparisons
[red: responses from stakeholders / green: conclusion by data collectors]
Progress: FI, FR, DE, LV, SI, UK
Policy-tool: AT, FR, NL, SI
Background for policy-making: FI, CZ, LV, DE, NL
Shortcomings in data availability: CZ

9. Thank You 12