Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Figure 1. Comparison of weighted estimates of diarrhoea prevalence in children under five by country between PMA2020 ... Figure 1. Comparison of weighted.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Figure 1. Comparison of weighted estimates of diarrhoea prevalence in children under five by country between PMA2020 ... Figure 1. Comparison of weighted."— Presentation transcript:

1 Figure 1. Comparison of weighted estimates of diarrhoea prevalence in children under five by country between PMA Figure 1. Comparison of weighted estimates of diarrhoea prevalence in children under five by country between PMA2020 data (1-week recall period) and DHS data (2-week recall period), error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Int J Epidemiol, dyz043, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

2 Figure 2. Comparison of diarrhoea prevalence in children under five using PMA2020 data (1-week recall period) and DHS ... Figure 2. Comparison of diarrhoea prevalence in children under five using PMA2020 data (1-week recall period) and DHS data (2-week recall period), across selected categorical variables. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Int J Epidemiol, dyz043, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

3 Figure 3. Comparison of adjusted odds ratios for select independent variables from multivariate logistic regression for ... Figure 3. Comparison of adjusted odds ratios for select independent variables from multivariate logistic regression for diarrhoea among children younger than 5 years between PMA2020 (1-week recall) and DHS (2-week recall), error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. Full model also adjusted for country and education (not displayed). Additionally, PMA2020 model includes water reliability, whereas DHS model includes time to collect water as a proxy for water reliability. Presence of a handwashing location was also not available in the DHS data. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Int J Epidemiol, dyz043, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.


Download ppt "Figure 1. Comparison of weighted estimates of diarrhoea prevalence in children under five by country between PMA2020 ... Figure 1. Comparison of weighted."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google