Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byPauliina Turunen Modified over 6 years ago
1
SMART-STRATEGY Trial design: Patients with a bifurcation coronary lesion were randomized to a conservative strategy (n = 128) vs. an aggressive strategy (n = 130) for provisional treatment of side branch coronary arteries. Results (p = 0.97) Target vessel failure at 1 year: 9.4% of the conservative group vs. 9.2% of the aggressive group (p = 0.97) Target lesion revascularization (TLR) for main branch at 1-3 years: 0 in the conservative group vs. 8 in the aggressive group (p = 0.007) 9.4 9.2 % Conclusions Among individuals with a bifurcation coronary lesion, a conservative approach to provisionally treat the side branch was superior to an aggressive approach The difference in TVR was mainly due to a significant increase in main vessel TLR in the aggressive group Conservative approach Aggressive approach Song YB, et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2016; 9:517-26
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.