1. EDWs perspective: the greatest CHALLENGE in human thinking
EDWs perspective: the greatest CHALLENGE in human thinking! (the STORM vs. the “sandboys”) Gabriel Vacariu (November 2018)

2. macro-EW: all macro-objects (planets, table, stones)
The Universe/world does not exist but ‘epistemologically different worlds’ (EDWs) are!
EDWs means:
macro-EW: all macro-objects (planets, table, stones)
micro-EW: microparticles
Waves/fields-EW: electromag waves/fields
A mind/life is an EW.
An electron does not exist for a planet.
Mind does not exist for the brain/body.
There is only CORRESPONDENCES (no ontological status) between entities from EDWs.
EDWs is NEITHER “ontological difference” nor “linguistic one”.
Difference “Ontology-Epistemology” = WORST in human thinking!!

3. “To exist” or “to be” = have certain limits which entail determinations.
Living being/the I = an indeterminate individuality has limits
Self is not “infinite” in any way has certain epistemological-ontological limits.
“Epistemological difference” - each class of entities the same “epistemological” abilities that man has: observation for man = interactions entity
“If I were a planet (or an electron), I would interact with another macroparticle (or with microparticles)”.
If “I were a cell, I would interact with the environment specific to a cell”.
However, living being (“life” as an EW) that corresponds to a cell does not interact with anything else, since it is an EW.

4. To “observe” (indirectly, through correspondence) the entities in a particular EW, we need certain “conditions of observation”.
“Observation” is an unidirectional process, since some of the entities we observe indirectly, through correspondences, are not in the same macro-EW as our brain/body, which corresponds to the I.
Perceptions are mental states, therefore are the self (EW).
The electron does not “observe”/interact with microscope electronic (macro) but with an amalgam of microparticles.
Human body (macro-entity) does not exist for electron.
The processes we use to observe entities belonging to EDWs are always indirect and happen through correspondence (no ontological status), even in the case of macro-objects, not just for micro-objects.

5. Two entities to interact (“observe” each other) must belong to the same EW.
All entities have ontological/epistemological limits imposed by their conditions of interaction.
Self “observes” indirectly macro-objects since perceptions are mental states which correspond to brain/body that interacts with environment.
If we change the conditions of observation, or if we use the same conditions with modified parameters, we will still (indirectly) observe different entities belonging to the same EW.
We need to cross an organizational threshold to shift our powers of observation (indirectly) from entities that belong to one EW to entities that belong to the same EW.

6. If we change the conditions of observation and if we pass an epistemological-ontological threshold, we can indirectly observe entities that belong to EDWs, shifting from entities and processes belonging to one EW to those belonging to an EDW.
Niels Bohr (see Vacariu 2005, 2008), any new apparatus of observation is a macro-tool constructed.
It is manipulated by our hands/body (including the brain), hands and body that correspond to the mind.
EDWs = “hyperontologization of epistemology”.
The ontologies of EDWs have become epistemologies and vice versa.

7. These “ontologies” are not “different ontologies” but “epistemologically different ontologies” = hyperontology of the “hyperverse” (= EDWs) (an abstract expression).
The EDWs perspective = new framework of thinking - new language.
Suma EDWs = Hyperverse - EDWs “are” but do not exist (only objects exist and mind-EW are)
Each set of interactions constitutes the surface of the entities that belong to an EW.

8. The EDWs perspective ( , 2006, 2008 and later - my first FIVE books (all English) posted on Internet immediately after publication) =
the greatest CHALANGE in the history of human thinking!
All my ideas = NEW FRAMEWORK OF THINKING =
EDWs perspective !
In my 10 books (written in 10 years - another ABSOLUTE record), I have changed EVERYTHING in Philosophy, Physics and Cognitive (Neuro)science… Everything!

9. I have changed the framework of human thinking completely
I have solved the GREATEST (i.e. philosophical) problems of each “special science”.
Only two theories remains untouched (Darwin’s evolution and Boltzmann’s entropy), but my EDWs perspective have furnished their ontologies.
All other theories have been either rejected (quantum mechanics, all approaches in cognitive neuroscience, etc., books ) or majors changed (in book 2010, we furnished the definition of ‘life’, in book 2017, we re-wrote Einstein’s both relativities – since in book 2016, we showed that space and time cannot even exist).

10. In last 100 years, ‘why nobody among great minds (Einstein, Bohr, Schrodinger, Heisenberg, Feynman, etc.) have discovered the correct answer to the main problems of Quantum Mechanics?’
After I published his articles and first two books ( – FREE all his FIVE books, on various sites, all English), many people have started to ‘find’ UNBELIEVABLE similar solutions to my alternatives to these problems?
Why nobody have found the answer to the mind-brain problem, but after my publications, many people have found UNBELIVABLE similar solution to my solution for this problem (and many related problems)?

11. 2500 years, nobody discovered the EDWs.
I discovered the EDWs and published first article in 2002
Then my main article 2005 (Synthese USA, one of the best journal in USA of philosophy of science)
Other articles 2006, my PhD thesis posted on the web of UNSW (Australia) in 2007
My first book (2008) = my PhD thesis from 2007!
Other four books (2010, 2011, 2012, all English) posted FREE at my webpage and other pages!
I have answered to ALL great problems, I HAVE CHANGED EVERYTHING in Physics, Cognitive Neuroscience and Philosophy!!!
My EDWs perspective will dominate human thinking (both science and philosophy) for the next 200 years!

12. With the EDWs perspective, we return to “the long forgotten image of philosophy that once guided science” (Friedman).
In fact, all GREAT CONSTRUCTIONS of great minds (great philosophers, great physicists (including Einstein’s relativity) have been demolished or dramatically changed by my EDWs perspective!
Discovering the existence of EDWs, I am “Newton (science) + Kant (philosophy)” of 21st Century!

13. After I published my first works (including 2005 and my PhD thesis 2007, my book 2008)↓
Incredible many people from many domains (Philosophy, Physics Cognitive Neuroscience), from many countries (SUA, Germany, Australia, Romania, etc. etc.), on many topics have published UNBELIEVABLE similar ideas to my ideas!!
Years after years, more and more “specialists” have been like “(poisonous) mushrooms after the rain”!
In principle, one such new FRAMEWORK of THINKING appears no more than one per two centuries!
NOBODY published similar ideas to my ideas BEFORE me!

14. I am Magellan2 who discovered the EDWs!
I have been the STORM against the entire human knowledge; those who have plagiarized my ideas have been just “naked sandboys" [child playing on the beach, making sand-castles and the like]
Even if their ideas are UNBELIEVABLE similar to my ideas, their “constructions” are just “sand-castles” vs. not only the waves of sea, but a great storm!
NOBODY have been able to PLAGIARIZE my ENTIRE EDWs FRAMEWORK because I have constructed it writing many books/articles, based on knowledge from an incredible number of very different books/articles…

15. 2005 article at SYNTHESE (USA) best Philosophy journal
Gabriel Vacariu (November ) The UNBELIEVABLE similarities between the ideas of some people ( ) and my ideas ( ) in physics (quantum mechanics, cosmology), cognitive neuroscience, philosophy of mind, and philosophy at
Statistically, impossible two persons to discover EDWs in same century. However, many “sandboys” have published similar ideas to my ideas in the last 10 years!!! IMPOSSIBLE !!!
2005 article at SYNTHESE (USA) best Philosophy journal
2016 book SPRINGER (Germany) all my ideas of first FIVE books!

16. My discussion with a GREAT professor
(after I have published my article 2005 (Synthese, USA) and my four books).
We were walking on a street. I reminded him: “C-tin Noica mentioned there were only 12 philosophers/‘Apostles’ in history of philosophy: 4 ‘evangelists’ Plato, Aristotle, Kant and Hegel + 8 Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, etc. = 12 philosophers.”
Then, I added: “I am the 13th!”
The professor stopped walking, looked at me and, very seriously, asked me:
“Are you Jesus?”
“Yes!”, I replied.
After few seconds of silence, without talking anymore, we entered into the mall.