1. 2019 NSRP All Panel Meeting
March 12-14, 2019
Charleston, SC

2. Welcome
Over 400 Navy and shipbuilding and repair industry personnel have registered for this event!
Today’s agenda
Keynote Addresses
State of the Panel Addresses
Afternoon Technical Tracks
Expo located in the Colonial Room
Reception located in the Carolina Ballroom

3. Meeting Information Guide
Located at the registration area
Includes agendas, biographies, abstracts and more
Wi-Fi Code: 5190

4. Tim Glinatsis Vice President of Engineering GD Bath Iron Works
Executive Control Board Chair

5. NSRP: 2019 and Beyond
March 12 – 14, 2019
Charleston, SC

6. NSRP Program Mission
Manage and focus national shipbuilding and ship repair research & development funding on technologies and processes that will:
Reduce the total ownership cost of ships for the U.S. Navy, other national security customers and the commercial sector
Develop and leverage best commercial and naval practices to improve the efficiency of the U.S. shipbuilding and ship repair industry
Provide a collaborative framework to improve shipbuilding- related technical and business processes
Reduce the total ownership
Develop and leverage best
practices
Proposed Presenter: Glinatsis
collaborative

7. NSRP Collaboration Proposed Presenter: Glinatsis WHY HERE?
Haven’t briefed SEA00 or ASN(RD&A) in a couple of years; hoping to get back on annual briefing drumbeat
New Joint Funding Agreement signed March 2018
Address Bollinger intent to withdraw and 2016 withdrawal of Vigor
Taking seriously; considered cancelling this briefing; two-day ECB deep dive as collaboration with senior NAVSEA NSRP program leadership 2-3 Oct

8. Funds Appropriated to NSRP
NSRP Navy Sponsors
Annual NSRP Budget
NAVSEA 05
Funds Appropriated to NSRP
DUCA: Perhaps a fine point, but N96 funds in Budget Line Item are “appropriated” to NSRP; rest of funding is contributions (“taxes”), but the taxes ARE from appropriated sources

9. NSRP Structure Proposed Presenter: Duca
Discuss makeup of ECB (VPs, Directors)
Discuss Extended Team (primarily comprised of shipbuilders)
Panels have active Gov’t/TWH involvement
NSWC Engineers are funded to support panels

10. NSRP RA Project Participation
The Research Announcement (RA) consistently receives more proposals than can be funded, enabling a down-select for better, highest impact projects.

11. RA Projects 2014-2018 (By Specific Category)
Wide range of interests are reflected in the specific categories
Discrete products (e.g. Swage Bhds, IBP) counted along with project areas (e.g. Info Mgmt Systems)
Reasonable distribution of projects and funding across categories
$ value
# Projects
Robotics
AR/VR*
Welding
Training*
Commonality
IT Solutions
Laser Peening
Modeling/Sim.
Insul. Bus Pipe
Info Management
Digital Shipbuilding
Swage Technology

12. RA Project Transition to Use (Since 2009)
71%
In use in at least one shipyard 58 41 12
Completed Projects
In use in at least one shipyard
Planned for use in at least one shipyard
21%
Planned for use in at least one shipyard
Got rid of “Implementation”
According to NSRP shipyard responses:
71% of the RA projects are implemented in at least one NSRP shipyard.
21% of the RA projects are not implemented but are planned to be in at least one NSRP shipyard.
8% of the RA projects are not implemented and not planned to be implemented in any NSRP shipyards.
Additionally, 33% of the RA projects are implemented in two or more NSRP shipyards. 67% of the RA projects are still planned in at least one NSRP shipyard and 33% of the RA projects are still planned in two or more NSRP shipyards.

13. Panel Projects (≤$150k)
Panel Projects are “quick wins” and the lifeblood of the NSRP Panels.

14. Who has skin in the game? ~$13.5M in Navy funding
>50% industry cost share from shipyards and vendors
Research projects
Panel Meetings
Implementation
Tech Transition

15. Impacts 41 NSRP RA Projects
Transitioned NSRP projects influence a wide variety of Navy and commercial ship classes
Commercial/MSC
41 NSRP RA Projects
CVN
LPD
LCS 1/
LCS 2
DDG 51 / DDG 1000
T-EPF
New slide; ATI will provide back-up to explain these numbers
T-AO
Virginia/ Columbia
CPB/
FRC

16. But are we meeting the needs?
I firmly believe we can innovate at scale. I don’t think that you have to put a ‘special’ in front of your name or a ‘rapid’ in front of your name in order to innovate at scale.
– Hon. James F. Geurts

17. Times are changing Turnover in NSRP extended team Focus on Lifecycle
Executive Director
Executive Control Board
Major Initiative Team Leads
Panel Chairs
Focus on Lifecycle
Digital vs. traditional shipbuilding technologies
Workforce development

18. We must communicate Navy Owners Shipyards Industry Vendors PEOs NAVSEA
SUPSHIP
Owners
Shipyards
Industry
Vendors

19. We will adapt Communicate more often with stakeholders
Annual report from ECB to the Navy
ECB / NSRP communications
Incorporate feedback and focus research efforts
Leverage Annual Technology Investment Plan
Conduct regular SIP reviews
Improve and diversify participation
Better leverage cost share
Encourage industry / vendor base

20. The next 50 years The collaboration is strong
We will continue to solicit and respond to the needs of the Navy, USCG, commercial customers and the industry
NSRP will help enable a strong shipbuilding industry, and the Navy the nation needs
DUCA: Too Navy centric? Mention other national security customers and commercial?