Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJamal Shortt Modified over 10 years ago
1
2013 Gartner PPM & IT Governance Summit A Whole New Dimension of PPM Analytics May 2013 National Harbor, MD
3
c Advanced Analytics: Predictive, Collaborative and Pervasive 16 February 2012 Analysts: Rita L. Sallam and David W. Cearley Next generation analytics will expand beyond measuring and describing the past to predicting what is likely to happen, and optimizing what should happen, based on an increasingly varied set of data sources and types.
4
May 2013 Baltimore, MD c Advanced Analytics: Predictive, Collaborative and Pervasive 16 February 2012 Analysts: Rita L. Sallam and David W. Cearley Incorporating consumer interaction paradigms that make advanced analytic applications mobile, social and collaborative will empower a broader set of users giving them more high-value insight for decision making at the time and place of every business process action.
5
May 2013 Baltimore, MD c Advanced Analytics: Predictive, Collaborative and Pervasive 16 February 2012 Analysts: Rita L. Sallam and David W. Cearley Organizations will need to put in place new processes and technologies to capitalize on this opportunity. A lack of skills will be the biggest challenge.
7
Our Challenge Product Focus 1 – False Positives Resource Capacity Planning / Forecasting / Simplified What-If Change from reactive to proactive thinking. Become nimble. Answer questions – quickly. Make sense out of resource-allocation chaos. Simulate changes to project timing and resource allocation. Empower PMOs to opportunistically and dynamically shift to optimize resource allocation. Eliminate false positives. Product Focus 2 – False Negatives Project Portfolio Management / Project Valuation / Opportunity Engineering Introduce real-options thinking and entrepreneurial management into project valuation and selection. Avoid the value destroying effects of NPV-based thinking. Engineer-away risk and spur innovation in your organization. Eliminate false negatives.
8
Resource Forecasting
10
Resource Forecasting with Tempus Today, decision makers lack simplified tools to conduct powerful what-if analysis. Our customers are often handed a set of projects, each with a varying degree of resource allocation. When decision makers need to understand the ability or inability to deliver, the challenge is typically resource-driven. Resource Forecasting with Tempus allows decision makers to look over-the- horizon and not only understand the state of current resource allocation but also simulate changes to the project portfolio to identify the net impact on the resource profile of the organization.
11
Resource Forecasting with Tempus With todays tools, in order for a decision maker to perform a what-if with regards to project timing, Excel, data-dumps, pivot-tables, etc. are employed. Only a limited, pre-defined, number of scenarios are evaluated. The scenarios are then handed off to an analyst or team of analysts to crunch the numbers requiring days or weeks of effort. Only the scenarios in the original set are considered. The team meets and reviews the limited scenarios. And repeat… Resource Forecasting with Tempus allows decision makers to consider an unbounded set of scenarios independent of working groups, analysts or consultants. Individuals are empowered to proactively identify resourcing opportunities.
12
Resource Mode
13
Simulate Changes
14
View Net Effects
15
Drill Down to Task Level
16
View Net Effects & Simulate Changes
20
Valuation Mode
21
Project Valuation
22
Project Valuation with Tempus For years and even today, organizations rely on NPV for project selection. This approach assumes we either do or do not do a project. Every project is viewed and priced as a bond. This is the NPV view of a product valuation discounted returns from production & sales minus the investment in the project
23
Project Valuation Project Valuation with Tempus Some organizations expand on their NPV-type thinking by introducing Monte Carlo-based simulation. The problem remains. A project is either selected or deselected based on its value at completion. If we introduce uncertainty to the model we get a range of values for the costs, revenues and profits. To compensate the common practice increase the discount rate or haircut revenue estimates. The result? Lower NPV that leads to good projects being dismissed because they have low or negative value. This leads to false negatives that destroy growth.
24
Project Valuation Project Valuation with Tempus Tempus introduces the concept of optionality and entrepreneurial management. Value may lie at exit opportunities located along the projects lifecycle. Each of these contingencies create value and should be considered. Even early exits create value because the resources can be redirected elsewhere and put to better use. NPV lacks the flexibility needed for our times to capture the contingent value found in projects.
25
Project Valuation Project Valuation with Tempus Tempus introduces the concept of optionality and entrepreneurial management. Value may lie at exit opportunities located along the projects lifecycle. Each of these contingencies create value and should be considered. Even early exits create value because the resources can be redirected elsewhere and put to better use. NPV lacks the flexibility needed for our times to capture the contingent value found in projects. Example Opportunity Engineering A company has developed a new IT concept that will allow it to create a financial planning tool that it thinks will allow it to enter a new market. If they decide to go forward the cost to develop the product and enter the market is $200. There is a 5% chance that the product will gain rapid acceptance. The expected present value (PV) is $1400 if the acceptance is rapid, $0 if it is slow (dicey competitors, choosy customers). Do you think that they should do it?
26
Project Valuation Project Valuation with Tempus Tempus introduces the concept of optionality and entrepreneurial management. Value may lie at exit opportunities located along the projects lifecycle. Each of these contingencies create value and should be considered. Even early exits create value because the resources can be redirected elsewhere and put to better use. NPV lacks the flexibility needed for our times to capture the contingent value found in projects. Example Two Ways of Thinking Traditional Thinking: NPV = Expected PV Revenues – Total PV Costs = (0.05 x $1400) + (0.95 x $0) -$200 = $70 - $200 = -$130
27
Project Valuation Project Valuation with Tempus Tempus introduces the concept of optionality and entrepreneurial management. Value may lie at exit opportunities located along the projects lifecycle. Each of these contingencies create value and should be considered. Even early exits create value because the resources can be redirected elsewhere and put to better use. NPV lacks the flexibility needed for our times to capture the contingent value found in projects. Example Two Ways of Thinking Traditional Thinking: NPV = Expected PV Revenues – Total PV Costs = (0.05 x $1400) + (0.95 x $0) -$200 = $70 - $200 = -$130 Opportunistic Thinking: What if they can test market the product for $40 to remove much of the uncertainty surrounding the product?
28
Project Valuation Project Valuation with Tempus Tempus introduces the concept of optionality and entrepreneurial management. Value may lie at exit opportunities located along the projects lifecycle. Each of these contingencies create value and should be considered. Even early exits create value because the resources can be redirected elsewhere and put to better use. NPV lacks the flexibility needed for our times to capture the contingent value found in projects. Example Two Ways of Thinking Traditional Thinking: NPV = Expected PV Revenues – Total PV Costs = (0.05 x $1400) + (0.95 x $0) -$200 = $70 - $200 = -$130 Opportunistic Thinking: What if they can test market the product for $40 to remove much of the uncertainty surrounding the product? If we value as we would run it, we get a very different answer: = -$40 + 0.05 (-$200 + $1400 ) + 0.95 x (0+0) = -$40 + $60 = $20
29
Plan Future Projects
30
View Valuation Report
31
Optimize Valuation
33
Contact Information ProSymmetry, LLC Sean Pales, Managing Director Booth 310 spales@prosymmetry.com 216.337.9165
34
2013 Gartner PPM & IT Governance Summit A Whole New Dimension of PPM Analytics May 2013 National Harbor, MD
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.