1. Questionnaire Results December 1999 & June 2000
2019/4/26
Questionnaire Results December 1999 & June 2000
2019/4/26

2. Overall Evaluation December 1999 Excellent…2 (11%) Good …….5 (28%)
So-so……..9 (50%)
Bad……….2 (11%)
June 2000
Excellent..….1 (4%)
Good………10 (37%)
So-so………12 (44%)
Bad………….4 (15%)
2019/4/26

3. Excellent ….3 (7%) December 1999
2019/4/26
Excellent ….3 (7%)
December 1999
I could listen to it as many times as I liked.
The necessity of computers has been rising.
June 2000
It provided an comfortable listening environment.
2019/4/26

4. Good . ….15 (33%) December 1999 It was a new approach for me.
2019/4/26
Good . ….15 (33%)
December 1999
It was a new approach for me.
I was able to work on it at my own pace .
Good opportunity to learn how to use the computer,
It was interesting.
2019/4/26

5. Good (continued) June 2000 I think my listening skills have improved.
A new way for the 21st centry.
It was good that I was able to listen to it as often as possible.
2019/4/26

6. 2019/4/26
So-so…… 21 (47%)
December 1999
I wonder if this test really tests my ability.
There were many machine-related problems.
There were many obstacles as I am not familiar with the use of the computer.
2019/4/26

7. (So-so, continued) June 2000
2019/4/26
(So-so, continued)
June 2000
I prefer normal paper tests, because the preset test is not fair.
I say many times, but I am not familiar with the use of the Macintosh computer, so I had a hard time.
I lost time because of my unfamiliarity about the computer.
2019/4/26

8. 2019/4/26
Bad……… 6 (13%)
December 1999
I could not begin soon due to problems on the computer.
June 2000
It made me very tired.
There are so many things I don't understand.
2019/4/26