1. Development and Psychometric Properties of the Self-Efficacy Scale for Transfers for Caregivers of Children Requiring Transfer Assistance 
Julie J. Thomas, PhD, OTR/L, Dianne M. Shuford, MOT, OTR/L, Jessica C. Duke, MOT, OTR/L, Daniel J. Cipriani, PhD, PT 
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
DOI: /j.apmr
Copyright © 2007 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

2. Fig 1
Construct validity key map indicating the hierarchical order for indoor transfers (shaded bars) versus outdoor transfers (unshaded bars) noting adverse and optimal conditions. NOTE. N=71; items=14. Abbreviations: M, mean; S, 1 SD; T, 2 SDs.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2007 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

3. Fig 2
Graphic representation of item difficulty compared with caregivers’ self-efficacy scores. NOTE. Numbers correspond to items on the CSEST in placement of perceived item difficulty. Abbreviations: a, adverse transfer condition in item; o, optimal transfer condition in item; X, caregivers’ scores (N=71).
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2007 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions