1. A systematic review and meta-analysis of débridement methods for chronic diabetic foot ulcers 
Tarig Elraiyah, MBBS, Juan Pablo Domecq, MD, Gabriela Prutsky, MD, Apostolos Tsapas, MD, PhD, Mohammed Nabhan, MD, Robert G. Frykberg, DPM, MPH, Rim Hasan, MD, Belal Firwana, MD, Larry J. Prokop, MLS, Mohammad Hassan Murad, MD, MPH 
Journal of Vascular Surgery 
Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages 37S-45S.e2 (February 2016)
DOI: /j.jvs
Copyright © 2016 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

2. Fig 1
The process of study selection. RCT, Randomized controlled trial.
Journal of Vascular Surgery  , 37S-45S.e2DOI: ( /j.jvs )
Copyright © 2016 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

3. Fig 2
Autolytic débridement vs conventional wound care. The solid squares indicate the risk ratio and are proportional to the weights used in the meta-analysis. The diamond indicates the pooled risk ratio, and the lateral tips of the diamond indicate the associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The horizontal lines represent the 95% CIs.
Journal of Vascular Surgery  , 37S-45S.e2DOI: ( /j.jvs )
Copyright © 2016 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

4. Fig 3
Larval débridement vs conventional wound care. The solid squares indicate the risk ratio and are proportional to the weights used in the meta-analysis. The diamond indicates the pooled risk ratio, and the lateral tips of the diamond indicate the associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The horizontal lines represent the 95% CIs.
Journal of Vascular Surgery  , 37S-45S.e2DOI: ( /j.jvs )
Copyright © 2016 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions