1. Motion to Reconsider on MSDU Lifetime limits
Month 2000
doc.: IEEE /xxx
July 2001
Motion to Reconsider on MSDU Lifetime limits
Author:
Matthew Sherman
AT&T Labs - Research
180 Park Avenue
Florham Park, NJ
Date: July, 2001
Matthew Sherman, AT&T Labs - Research
John Doe, His Company

2. Month 2000
doc.: IEEE /xxx
July 2001
Why Reconsidered
Arguments in favor of MDSU lifetime handicapped by absence of editor (Flight delayed)
Many arguments presented which supported MSDU lifetime as MIB variable
Existing text implemented MSDU lifetime as MIB value
Presentation of centralized control of MSDU lifetime via AP may have confused audience
Mislead audience to consider MSDU lifetime as centralized AP parameter rather than MIB value
If it had been clear that audience was voting on MSDU lifetime MIB value may have had different result
Matthew Sherman, AT&T Labs - Research
John Doe, His Company

3. Text from 802.11e/D1 Section 9.2.5.3, 3rd paragraph
Month 2000
doc.: IEEE /xxx
July 2001
Text from e/D1 Section , 3rd paragraph
ESTAs shall maintain a transmit MSDU timer for each MSDU passed to the MAC.The MIB value aMSDULifetime [i ]specifies the maximum amount of time allowed to transmit an MSDU of traffic category i. If an ESTA implements these optional MIB parameters,an MSDU timer shall be started when the MSDU is passed to the MAC.If a timer exceeds its associated aMSDULifetime [i ]then all remaining fragments of that MSDU shall be discarded by the source STA and no attempt is made to complete transmission of that MSDU.
Matthew Sherman, AT&T Labs - Research
John Doe, His Company